Keka Performance vs UKG comparison

Keka and UKG are both solutions in the Talent Management category. Keka is ranked #24 with an average rating of 7.0, while UKG is ranked #6 with an average rating of 8.0. Keka holds a 0.4% mindshare in TM, compared to UKG’s 5.1% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of Keka users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 89% of UKG users who would recommend it.

Keka Performance

Read 1 Keka Performance review

203 Views
193 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

UKG

Read 125 UKG reviews

5,232 Views
3,872 Comparison Views

89% willing to recommend

Keka Performance

UKG

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Keka Performance and UKG based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about Workday, SAP, Oracle and others in Talent Management.

To learn more, read our detailed Talent Management Report (Updated: June 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Talent Management

June 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 862,543 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Keka Performance

Ranking in Talent Management

24th

Average Rating

7.0

Reviews Sentiment

7.3

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

UKG

Ranking in Talent Management

6th

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

6.7

Number of Reviews

125

Ranking in other categories

Benefits Administration (5th), Employee Scheduling Software (1st), Cloud HCM (5th), Employee Time Tracking Software (2nd), HR Analytics Software (2nd), Talent Acquisition (6th)

Mindshare comparison

As of July 2025, in the Talent Management category, the mindshare of Keka Performance is 0.4%, up from 0.2% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of UKG is 5.1%, up from 4.9% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Talent Management

Featured Reviews

Soumyojit Sen

Director of Product Management at EIM solutions

User-friendly and has an easy-to-use user interface, but does not provide project or task management features

We use the tool for resourcing, recruitment, employee attendance, payroll, and performance evaluation The interface is good. The features and performance are also good. I rate the performance an eight out of ten. It is user-friendly and easy to use. It is a secure product. The solution must…

Read full review

Talia Jean Paul

Global HR UKG Specialist at a outsourcing company with 10,001+ employees

Affordable but needs to improve its stability

Our company is testing the UKG Ready Mobile App, but there are some glitches. I feel that in the system when you log on to Kronos, UKG Dimensions, and UKG Workforce Central, we have different modules in different versions. With regards to the newer version, I feel the older version, which was UKG Workforce Central, was more user-friendly for the end user as opposed to the newer version, which looks a bit more complicated. When training someone who wants implementations to be done, it would be easier if you could hover above certain things, and it shows you or tells you exactly what it is. There are certain SAP modules that can be audible. If you click on it if someone is being a bit slow with regards to training, the tool will tell you what needs to be done and what needs not to be done by you, but for us, it is fine because we are in the back end with configuration and the administrators. I am talking about the need for improvements in the tool for the benefit of the end users. The explanation on UKG's community consists of training manuals and some of the other stuff that we use, and we send to our supervisors at the site. With the tool in place, catching onto white-collared employees is quicker. The tool is not quick to catch onto certain blue-collared employees in the plant or supervisors who are actually working with machinery and stuff because they are not as computer-centric as white-collared employees. If I could scan the tool across the globe with our site supervisors, there are a few loopholes in the tool. There are some issues with the tool's stability. For me, I would like someone who is building the system in the back end to know if a front-end user can manipulate the system. I am not going to rate the tool's scalability to be high. I would rate the tool's scalability to be at a mediocre level or at something like 50 percent, so there is a lot of room for improvement.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The interface is good."

"It enables us to manage the system ourselves. We don't need an additional team to do a lot of maintenance and add the things that we want."

"The employee self-service feature is most valuable. This is the restaurant industry, and they have a mobile app that allows employees to go in and manage their data. So, employees can manage direct deposit accounts, emergency contacts, and other things in the app. That's definitely the biggest benefit."

"The solution has improved our organization by helping us cut hours and lessen our labor force. It saved us probably over $100,000 in just the last couple of years."

"The fact that I can see the whole HR information in a single point is valuable. There is a unified view of everything, which is good. Previously, we had many different systems for each part of the information. Now, it is all centralized. It is very good."

"Overall, I would rate UKG nine out of ten."

"The setup process is straightforward."

"The product's most valuable feature is the ability to establish connectivity between the front and the back end, particularly the single point of data entry, to minimize mistakes."

"The most valuable feature is being able to get time management reports which break out reclassified jobs and departments to separate areas of the company. This allows for better tracking of hours spent in certain jobs and where more hours may be needed."

More UKG pros

Cons

"The solution must provide project or task management features."

"The platform's features need enhancement while being used as a recruiting tool."

"Certainly, the time and attendance and the payroll integration need a lot of work. They are disjointed pieces, and they don't work smoothly together. That's the main drawback."

"The system is slow sometimes."

"UKG could be a little more flexible in some areas."

"One area where UKG could improve is in its ability to understand its own competency and then work hard to improve it."

"UKG has complex clock-in and clock-out features. It changes things too often, and it feels like the tool is constantly changing things without testing before implementing changes in production. Additionally, it doesn't communicate these changes very well."

"I would like to see more functionality in the next release to be able to get hours and dollars per calendar month rather than just by payroll in the Business Intelligence reports."

"The product's integration features need improvement."

More UKG cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"It would be good if the product were cheaper."

"UKG's pricing and licensing model involves ongoing expenses based on the number of employees paid. The initial implementation cost is low when UKG implements it directly. However, when partners handle the implementation, it becomes more expensive since partners don't receive the monthly recurring fees."

"The platform is not affordable but also not the most expensive."

"I wasn't involved in the pricing part. I'm a user, and I believe it is based on the user count. One thing that is nice about Ultimate is that you can learn how to use the system without additional fees. The learning aspect is the life of a product, and the training was a huge reason why we went with Ultimate. We did have some integration costs. They were a part of the implementation because of the integrations to other systems that we included in our implementation."

"If you're going for the full suite, it can be fairly pricey."

"The pricing depends on the number of licenses we buy."

"While I am unsure of the licensing cost itself, the total cost of implementation and licensing for a company with over 5000 employees would be around 6,00,000. So, there are additional costs beyond licensing."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Talent Management solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

862,543 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

No data available

Computer Software Company

Manufacturing Company

Comms Service Provider

Financial Services Firm

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Keka Performance?

The interface is good.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Keka Performance?

We pay a yearly license fee. It would be good if the product were cheaper.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Keka Performance?

The solution must provide project or task management features. It would be good if it could be integrated with Zoho Projects or GitLab. If Keka provides project management features, we need not use...

See all answers

What needs improvement with UKG?

UKG needs more publicity. It is a productive ERP ( /categories/erp ) application, but many people in the IT market are not aware of it. Greater awareness could increase its adoption.

See all answers

What is your primary use case for UKG?

I worked for a healthcare organization and a university. Most organizations use UKG ( /products/ukg-reviews ) to track employee timesheets, capturing accurate swipe-in and swipe-out data. UKG ( /pr...

See all answers

What advice do you have for others considering UKG?

Publicity is very important for any software. If people aren't aware of UKG, despite its productivity, they won't use it. Expanding the awareness is essential for greater adoption. Overall, I would...

See all answers

Comparisons

DarwinBox vs Keka Performance

Compared 73% of the time

PeopleStrong vs Keka Performance

Compared 28% of the time

More Keka Performance Competitors

Workday vs UKG

Compared 25% of the time

SAP SuccessFactors vs UKG

Compared 16% of the time

SAP HCM vs UKG

Compared 11% of the time

Dayforce HCM vs UKG

Compared 8% of the time

PeopleSoft vs UKG

Compared 7% of the time

More UKG Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Talent Management

June 2025

Download Keka Performance product report

Buyer's Guide

UKG

June 2025

Download UKG product report

Also Known As

Keka HR

UKG Pro, UKG Dimensons, UKG Ready

Overview

Keka is the PMS that really works for growth-minded organizations that need continuous performance reviews on a real-time basis. Keka performance management software monitors, analyzes, tracks, and evaluates employee performance to ensure that goals are achieved, and the desired ROI is accomplished.

Keka

At UKG, our purpose is people — real people with real challenges, and a simple request. Help me keep my employees productive, connected, and happy. So that’s what we did.

We’ve created an unmatched suite of HR and workforce management solutions, backed by our people who care about yours. Our solutions deliver global workforce experiences that truly reflect the connection between life and work today. That means insights are deeper. Work is easier. And interactions are more meaningful.

UKG

Sample Customers

vedanta, oyo, oneplus, dream 11, Netambit, Exotel, Upgrad, Travel traingle, Zestmoney, hitachi, Wood stock, Mitsubhishi, Karcher,

Tesla, Marriott, Yamaha, Aramark, Feeding America, Samsung, Sony Music, Dave & Buster's, Revlon

Find out what your peers are saying about Workday, SAP, Oracle and others in Talent Management. Updated: June 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

862,543 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our list of best Talent Management vendors.

We monitor all Talent Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.