We performed a comparison between Katalon Studio and Qualitia Automation Studio based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Tricentis, OpenText, Katalon Studio and others in Test Automation Tools."The functionality of the data is very good. You can upload and disperse data using the solution."
"This solution is very user-friendly to learn and implement, and less technical knowledge is required to handle automation."
"One of the features that I like is Object Recognition. It worked very well, and it allowed me to create a dynamic expert based on my requirements."
"The tool is easy to use. The product gives me the flexibility to use Selenium. I can also use my Java capabilities in the solution."
"The scalability of the product is good."
"I like the feature where you can define a model that represents your website and then reuse the components from the model. It makes creating more test cases easy."
"The recording feature of this product is very valuable for our testing purposes."
"It is good for API testing. It is also good for continuous integration testing. You can connect it to Jenkins."
"The best feature of this solution is the fact that it offers scriptless automation. You don't need to know how to code or program to use it."
"One improvement would be if it could support more programming languages such as JavaScript or Python. Right now, it is only on Groovy, which I think is not a too popular language."
"Katalon Studio should improve its usability, it still needs some improvement where users can easily use it to build their automation suite. It requires some initial work to set it up. There should be more keywords in the library to limit the coding requirements, this will allow a non-technical person easily start using it, which would be better."
"It would be helpful to have an automatic save feature."
"Support options need improvement. It is sometimes hard to find a solution to any given problem, thus you are forced to use another solution."
"The tool's maintenance is very difficult since they do not follow call by value or call by reference. Due to this, any change happening is not reflected throughout all the test cases. There are some issues with data parameterization as well."
"One aspect that can be improved is testing for desktop applications. I would like to see them support more technologies in this area."
"Object Spy is brittle. When I try to capture objects, I have to proceed multiple times before it works."
"Currently, I'm the only one who can use it because I have a Mac. It is giving a hard time to my team members who are on Linux. My team members are using Linux, and Katalon doesn't support Linux very well. It keeps on crashing. It crashes and shuts down almost every time they save their work, so they are not able to use it. It should have good support for Linux. We don't know what the problem is. If the Katalon team can pick up this issue, it will be very helpful."
"The integrations for this solutions could be improved, specifically for Slack."
Katalon Studio is ranked 3rd in Test Automation Tools with 41 reviews while Qualitia Automation Studio is ranked 23rd in Test Automation Tools with 5 reviews. Katalon Studio is rated 7.8, while Qualitia Automation Studio is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of Katalon Studio writes "Useful multiple technology platform, scalable, but usability could improve". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Qualitia Automation Studio writes "Good Tool for Non Technical Users". Katalon Studio is most compared with Tricentis Tosca, Postman, OpenText UFT One, Testim and Appium, whereas Qualitia Automation Studio is most compared with Tricentis Tosca, OpenText UFT One and Selenium HQ.
See our list of best Test Automation Tools vendors and best Regression Testing Tools vendors.
We monitor all Test Automation Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.