


Kaspersky Next XDR Optimum and Trellix Endpoint Detection and Response compete in the endpoint security category. Kaspersky has the upper hand with its stability and compatibility, while Trellix stands out with advanced threat investigation.
Features: Kaspersky Next XDR Optimum provides comprehensive endpoint protection, including package deployment, MDM, firewall control, and centralized management via Kaspersky Administrative Security Center. It is recognized for malware blocking, device protection, and its effective reporting system. Trellix Endpoint Detection and Response emphasizes advanced threat hunting, ransomware detection, integrated antivirus features, and offers intuitive threat investigation tools, enhancing comprehensive detection capabilities.
Room for Improvement: Kaspersky needs to advance its zero-day exploit protection, lessen resource consumption, and improve web control alongside AI integration and detailed reporting. Trellix EDR should focus on enhancing AI-driven analytics, alert systems, and centralizing policy management. Users of both products call for more streamlined deployment processes and resource efficiency to better integrate advanced features.
Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Kaspersky supports diverse deployment options, including on-premises, private cloud, and hybrid settings, but customer support experiences vary from prompt to delayed without premium support. Trellix EDR, mainly available through on-premises and hybrid clouds, excels in quick issue resolution yet needs better integration compatibility. Customer service experiences with Trellix are generally satisfactory.
Pricing and ROI: Kaspersky offers competitive pricing, with annual subscriptions and discounts for more agents, providing enterprise-level stability. While cost-effective, extensive deployments can be expensive. Trellix EDR's pricing is affordable for mid-sized businesses but restrictive for startups, with licensing options for add-ons essential for long-term budgeting. Customers recognize the ROI in Kaspersky for administration cost savings, while Trellix focuses on detection and response efficiency.
They appreciate the rich telemetry data from the solution, as it provides in-depth threat identification.
Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks helps to reduce my total cost of ownership significantly.
In Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks, most of the remediation is automated and the accuracy is quite good.
The advanced detection and mitigation capabilities ensure the highest level of protection and proper detection for command and control and bot attacks.
I have seen a return on investment with Trellix Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR); a lot of time is saved as it minimizes the efforts of manual work.
The technical support from Palo Alto deserves a mark of ten because they reach out within an hour whenever assistance is needed.
There is no back and forth, and they know what we are asking for and come up with the best resolution for a solution.
If any of these services are missed, it becomes a problem in terms of support tickets, follow-up, or special configuration that needs to be done in the system.
The technical support from Kaspersky was very responsive.
I would rate technical support from Kaspersky a nine out of ten.
I have contracted support and also have an operating control so I can get various types of support.
On our servers, we do not want it to touch our resources, so we deployed Sophos XDR on the server.
The customer support for Trellix Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) is excellent.
You can onboard 10,000 endpoints in just hours, which demonstrates the excellent scalability of this product.
Activating the newly purchased licenses is instantaneous, allowing installations without adjustments since it's cloud-based.
Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks can be expanded anytime by purchasing another license without any issues related to scalability.
Any endpoint added to Active Directory can be detected by Kaspersky Security Center, which can then push the agent onto it.
Both scalability and stability of Kaspersky Endpoint Security for Business are solid.
Trellix Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) is really scalable, allowing easy deployment with its agent across all devices and servers within the organization.
Cortex remains fast and responsive, even with increasing data and alerts.
The thresholds we've seen on our firewall boxes at some instances reached 80% to 85%, but even at that level of utilization, we don't observe any latency or any issues reported with respect to accessing the application.
Cortex XDR is stable, offering high quality and reliable performance.
There have been performance issues during scanning, causing the PC to respond slowly.
So I have to use Sophos XDR on servers because Sophos XDR does not consume resources.
Improving reporting and dashboard customization, along with the addition of real-time and exportable reports, would help SOC teams greatly.
The inclusion of this feature would allow the application of DLP policies alongside antivirus policies via a single agent and console, making it more competitive as other OEMs often offer DLP solutions as part of their antivirus products.
If the per GB data could be provided at a certain level free of cost or at the same cost which the customer is taking for the entire bundle, that would be better.
Kaspersky needs to improve its security techniques as it has not been in Gartner records for the last two years.
I previously mentioned that Kaspersky Endpoint Security for Business doesn't have built-in DLP, which was a concern.
Kaspersky Endpoint Security for Business does not have encryption tools.
I am seeing, for workflows, some sort of ethical hacking to test our environment.
Trellix Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) is interesting and is a very good entry point that has been evolving through the last years.
One area where Trellix Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) can be improved is the lack of device or user mapping.
The pricing on SentinelOne is far more reasonable and cheaper than Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks.
I would say it is definitely not a cheap product, considering how mature it is and how scalable all Palo Alto products are together.
Cortex XDR is perceived as expensive by some customers, yet offers dynamic pricing.
The pricing and licensing cost of Kaspersky Endpoint Security is cheaper compared to Trend Micro.
For the license requirement, we worked with the vendor to secure the minimum price for Trellix endpoint solutions, with no additional costs charged by the vendor.
My experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing is very cost-effective.
It incorporates AI for normal behavior detection, distinguishing unusual operations.
The product provides automation responses in case of a threat attack, severity assessments, centralized manageability, and comprehensive compliance features, resulting in reduced costs.
It includes machine learning to easily analyze data and detect complex threats across endpoints, networks, or clouds.
It stands out as an antivirus and malware protection solution due to its extensive feeds and resources for antivirus signatures.
The best features in Kaspersky Endpoint Security for Business are the file threat protection, web threat protection, mail threat protection, network threat protection, firewall, behavior detection, and exploit prevention.
The unified endpoint management and the capabilities that are added to the antivirus and anti-malware are what differentiate this solution from others.
Trellix Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) has very good threat hunting capability.
Advanced detection capabilities ensure that targeted attacks will be detected and blocked before they arrive at our network.
I have spent efforts on training our managers and others - what can software do if the knowledge base is low?
| Product | Mindshare (%) |
|---|---|
| Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks | 3.4% |
| Kaspersky Next XDR Optimum | 1.7% |
| Trellix Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) | 1.0% |
| Other | 93.9% |


| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 46 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 20 |
| Large Enterprise | 49 |
| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 63 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 27 |
| Large Enterprise | 33 |
| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 14 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 3 |
| Large Enterprise | 14 |
Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks provides advanced threat detection with AI-driven endpoint protection and seamless integration, ensuring multi-layered security and automatic threat response.
Cortex XDR is designed to safeguard endpoints against malware and suspicious activities. It offers advanced threat detection and response capabilities using behavioral analysis, AI, and machine learning. It seamlessly integrates with security infrastructures, providing endpoint security, firewall integration, and enhanced visibility in both cloud-based and on-premises environments.
What are the key features of Cortex XDR?Organizations in diverse sectors deploy Cortex XDR to protect against malware, leveraging its advanced threat detection capabilities. Its integration with existing security infrastructures appeals to those seeking comprehensive protection in both cloud and on-premises environments, providing enhanced visibility and threat intelligence.
Kaspersky Next XDR Optimum offers robust protection and user-friendly detection tools beyond endpoints for small to mid-sized businesses, enhancing cybersecurity strategies with essential EDR and seamless XDR integration.
Kaspersky Next XDR Optimum unites endpoint protection with automatic response capabilities, allowing businesses to identify, analyze, and neutralize threats efficiently. With features like antivirus, firewall, encryption, centralized management, and robust reporting, it supports multiple platforms and enhances secure environments for computers, servers, and networks. While user satisfaction is high due to its straightforward management and modular capabilities, some desire improvements in performance, AI integration, and cloud compatibility. Enhanced support, training, and simpler updates are also sought, though organizations value its effectiveness against malware and spyware. Despite high pricing and resource demands, Kaspersky's user-friendly approach and integration capabilities remain appreciated.
What are the features of Kaspersky Next XDR Optimum?
What benefits or ROI can users expect?
Organizations rely on Kaspersky Next XDR Optimum for endpoint protection against cyber threats, including malware and ransomware. Deployed across computers, servers, and mobile environments, it allows for centralized manageability, device control, and web access control. This approach ensures comprehensive security updates, file encryption, and efficient network activity monitoring, making it suitable for diverse business implementations.
Trellix Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) offers advanced threat detection using AI-driven analytics, real-time monitoring, and integration with the MITRE Framework, enhancing security through comprehensive detection and response features.
Trellix EDR provides users with tools for threat hunting, powerful forensic capabilities, and intuitive dashboards. It integrates with diverse systems and supports cloud-based multi-site configurations, which facilitates a more robust security posture. With features like effective quarantine measures, behavior monitoring, and automation, it enhances operational efficiency. Despite its strengths, areas for refinement include better AI-driven threat analysis, improved resource efficiency, and faster processing times. Enhancing detection capabilities for unknown threats and improving integration with other tools can significantly upgrade performance and usability.
What features define Trellix EDR?Trellix EDR is widely implemented in industries for endpoint protection and incident response. It helps protect workstations and improve threat intelligence by supporting integrations with cloud security and SIEM. Users benefit from its ability to identify malicious files and ransomware while adhering to zero-trust principles through improved telemetry visibility.
We monitor all Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.