


Kaspersky Next XDR Optimum and Lumu compete in the cybersecurity domain. While both have distinctive offerings, Lumu's unique focus on data-centric analytics gives it an edge.
Features: Kaspersky Next XDR Optimum provides advanced threat detection, automated response capabilities, and integration flexibility. Its approach offers a comprehensive suite of features addressing various security threats. Lumu, on the other hand, excels in real-time data correlation and network visibility tools. Its focus on cybersecurity intelligence and actionable IOCs significantly enhances threat detection and response efficiency.
Room for Improvement: Kaspersky could benefit from enhancing real-time data correlation to compete with Lumu's intelligence capabilities. Additionally, improving agility in deployment without compromising on support could be advantageous. For Lumu, providing more extensive customer support could enhance user experience, and simplifying integration processes might allow broader accessibility. Expanding the feature set to include more comprehensive advanced threat defense measures could also be beneficial.
Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Kaspersky emphasizes a streamlined deployment with comprehensive documentation and proactive customer service. This facilitates an efficient setup and thorough troubleshooting processes. Conversely, Lumu's agile deployment model enables quicker integration, appealing to those seeking a swift operational impact but relies more on self-service resources.
Pricing and ROI: Kaspersky offers cost-effective solutions, providing a notable ROI without significant additional costs due to its extensive features. Lumu, while potentially higher in initial setup costs, presents a strong ROI through its sophisticated data analytics, making the investment justified with its insights and intelligence capabilities.
They appreciate the rich telemetry data from the solution, as it provides in-depth threat identification.
Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks helps to reduce my total cost of ownership significantly.
In Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks, most of the remediation is automated and the accuracy is quite good.
It self-reports as saving 10 to 20 hours a week of engineer time.
The technical support from Palo Alto deserves a mark of ten because they reach out within an hour whenever assistance is needed.
There is no back and forth, and they know what we are asking for and come up with the best resolution for a solution.
If any of these services are missed, it becomes a problem in terms of support tickets, follow-up, or special configuration that needs to be done in the system.
The technical support from Kaspersky was very responsive.
I would rate technical support from Kaspersky a nine out of ten.
It picks up on borderline issues that matter.
You can onboard 10,000 endpoints in just hours, which demonstrates the excellent scalability of this product.
Activating the newly purchased licenses is instantaneous, allowing installations without adjustments since it's cloud-based.
Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks can be expanded anytime by purchasing another license without any issues related to scalability.
Any endpoint added to Active Directory can be detected by Kaspersky Security Center, which can then push the agent onto it.
Both scalability and stability of Kaspersky Endpoint Security for Business are solid.
Cortex remains fast and responsive, even with increasing data and alerts.
The thresholds we've seen on our firewall boxes at some instances reached 80% to 85%, but even at that level of utilization, we don't observe any latency or any issues reported with respect to accessing the application.
Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks can be trusted completely.
There have been performance issues during scanning, causing the PC to respond slowly.
Stability has been excellent.
Improving reporting and dashboard customization, along with the addition of real-time and exportable reports, would help SOC teams greatly.
The inclusion of this feature would allow the application of DLP policies alongside antivirus policies via a single agent and console, making it more competitive as other OEMs often offer DLP solutions as part of their antivirus products.
If the per GB data could be provided at a certain level free of cost or at the same cost which the customer is taking for the entire bundle, that would be better.
Kaspersky needs to improve its security techniques as it has not been in Gartner records for the last two years.
I previously mentioned that Kaspersky Endpoint Security for Business doesn't have built-in DLP, which was a concern.
Kaspersky Endpoint Security for Business does not have encryption tools.
Having some sort of certification or training, along with more periodic webinars might be helpful.
The pricing on SentinelOne is far more reasonable and cheaper than Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks.
I would say it is definitely not a cheap product, considering how mature it is and how scalable all Palo Alto products are together.
Compared to CrowdStrike, which is very costly, and SentinelOne, which is also very costly, Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks is a medium cost-efficient solution.
The pricing and licensing cost of Kaspersky Endpoint Security is cheaper compared to Trend Micro.
In our environment, it costs approximately 1200 a month.
It incorporates AI for normal behavior detection, distinguishing unusual operations.
The product provides automation responses in case of a threat attack, severity assessments, centralized manageability, and comprehensive compliance features, resulting in reduced costs.
It includes machine learning to easily analyze data and detect complex threats across endpoints, networks, or clouds.
It stands out as an antivirus and malware protection solution due to its extensive feeds and resources for antivirus signatures.
The best features in Kaspersky Endpoint Security for Business are the file threat protection, web threat protection, mail threat protection, network threat protection, firewall, behavior detection, and exploit prevention.
The unified endpoint management and the capabilities that are added to the antivirus and anti-malware are what differentiate this solution from others.
It provides peace of mind knowing that any device on our network, whether it is our own, BYOD device, or an unauthorized device, is being tracked and analyzed at multiple levels.
| Product | Mindshare (%) |
|---|---|
| Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks | 4.5% |
| Kaspersky Next XDR Optimum | 1.5% |
| Lumu | 1.2% |
| Other | 92.8% |

| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 46 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 21 |
| Large Enterprise | 54 |
| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 63 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 27 |
| Large Enterprise | 33 |
| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 6 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 1 |
| Large Enterprise | 4 |
Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks provides advanced threat detection with AI-driven endpoint protection and seamless integration, ensuring multi-layered security and automatic threat response.
Cortex XDR is designed to safeguard endpoints against malware and suspicious activities. It offers advanced threat detection and response capabilities using behavioral analysis, AI, and machine learning. It seamlessly integrates with security infrastructures, providing endpoint security, firewall integration, and enhanced visibility in both cloud-based and on-premises environments.
What are the key features of Cortex XDR?Organizations in diverse sectors deploy Cortex XDR to protect against malware, leveraging its advanced threat detection capabilities. Its integration with existing security infrastructures appeals to those seeking comprehensive protection in both cloud and on-premises environments, providing enhanced visibility and threat intelligence.
Kaspersky Next XDR Optimum offers robust protection and user-friendly detection tools beyond endpoints for small to mid-sized businesses, enhancing cybersecurity strategies with essential EDR and seamless XDR integration.
Kaspersky Next XDR Optimum unites endpoint protection with automatic response capabilities, allowing businesses to identify, analyze, and neutralize threats efficiently. With features like antivirus, firewall, encryption, centralized management, and robust reporting, it supports multiple platforms and enhances secure environments for computers, servers, and networks. While user satisfaction is high due to its straightforward management and modular capabilities, some desire improvements in performance, AI integration, and cloud compatibility. Enhanced support, training, and simpler updates are also sought, though organizations value its effectiveness against malware and spyware. Despite high pricing and resource demands, Kaspersky's user-friendly approach and integration capabilities remain appreciated.
What are the features of Kaspersky Next XDR Optimum?
What benefits or ROI can users expect?
Organizations rely on Kaspersky Next XDR Optimum for endpoint protection against cyber threats, including malware and ransomware. Deployed across computers, servers, and mobile environments, it allows for centralized manageability, device control, and web access control. This approach ensures comprehensive security updates, file encryption, and efficient network activity monitoring, making it suitable for diverse business implementations.
Lumu detects and validates network compromises by analyzing metadata like DNS, NetFlow, and proxy logs. It provides real-time indicators and context to enhance detection, improve threat visibility, and reduce investigation time.
Lumu offers organizations a streamlined solution to identify network compromises through comprehensive metadata analysis, including DNS, NetFlow, and proxy logs. By providing real-time compromise indicators alongside contextual information, Lumu elevates threat visibility and shortens investigation durations. Its simple interface and integration flexibility with platforms, alongside automated incident responses, highlight its value. While users appreciate limited false positives, ease of use, and the context provided, enhancements in SIEM and XDR integration, asset context enrichment, and reporting are areas users would like to see further developed.
What features define Lumu?Organizations use Lumu to monitor outbound traffic, detect compromised endpoints, log firewall activities, and enable active threat blocking. Its integration ease via API supports threat detection across LAN and Wi-Fi, monitoring email traffic, and acting as a managed SOC for security event coordination. Companies appreciate Lumu's adaptability in hybrid environments and its ability to efficiently locate and analyze threats within network metadata, ensuring quick deployment and extendibility across external platforms.
We monitor all Extended Detection and Response (XDR) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.