

OpenText Core Endpoint Protection and Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response Optimum compete in the cybersecurity category. Kaspersky appears to have the upper hand due to its advanced features and user satisfaction despite higher costs.
Features: OpenText Core offers a lightweight design with a cloud console that is easy on resources. Its AI feature helps in maintaining strong endpoint security without system slowdowns. Endpoint navigation protection effectively manages devices. Kaspersky excels with advanced threat hunting, precise malware detection, and robust threat response tools ensuring comprehensive device management and strong network protection.
Room for Improvement: OpenText Core could improve threat detection and reporting, as users report slower response times and a need for better analytics. Enhanced ransomware protection and mobile device compatibility are also needed. Kaspersky could focus on improving support response times, simplifying uninstallation processes, and enhancing integration transparency and management interfaces.
Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Both solutions offer public, private, and hybrid cloud deployment options. OpenText is noted for its lightweight and easier deployment. OpenText's customer service is generally prompt, though some mention delays. Kaspersky's support is consistently excellent, with room for improvement in contact methods.
Pricing and ROI: OpenText is known for affordability, suiting smaller businesses while maintaining basic protection features. Its pricing structure is straightforward and offers good value. Kaspersky, although more expensive, provides superior features and effective threat detection, appealing to organizations prioritizing advanced security. Both show potential for ROI, with OpenText on competitive pricing and Kaspersky on advanced security benefits.
| Product | Market Share (%) |
|---|---|
| Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response Optimum | 0.9% |
| OpenText Core Endpoint Protection | 1.1% |
| Other | 98.0% |

| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 15 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 6 |
| Large Enterprise | 6 |
| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 35 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 2 |
| Large Enterprise | 2 |
Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) Optimum delivers straightforward defense-in-depth against complex and advanced threats with no additional overheads. Use automated and 'single-click' responses so you can ensure every last piece of the threat is rooted out of your system.
OpenText Core Endpoint Protection offers cloud-managed endpoint security with AI integration, providing real-time protection and lightweight performance. It ensures low system impact, seamless cloud integration, and cost-effective security solutions for various devices.
OpenText Core Endpoint Protection is a comprehensive endpoint security platform utilized by managed-service providers for antivirus and firewall functionality across servers, workstations, and mobile devices. It employs AI for robust threat detection, integrating with cloud applications for real-time updates. Multi-layered security features include malware protection, network defense, and DNS protection. Although connectivity and threat reporting need improvement, this platform extensively supports remote device management and integrates efficiently with Active Directory policies.
What are the key features of OpenText Core Endpoint Protection?OpenText Core Endpoint Protection finds application in industries requiring stringent data protection and peace of mind over device security. Managed-service providers implement this for comprehensive antivirus and firewall features, safeguarding multi-device networks. It is particularly useful for DNS protection and integrating with Active Directory policies, enabling secure yet flexible operations across sectors.
We monitor all Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.