Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

Kaseya Traverse vs OpenText Network Operations Management comparison

Kaseya and OpenText are both solutions in the Network Monitoring Software category. Kaseya is ranked #56 with an average rating of 8.0, while OpenText is ranked #64 with an average rating of 8.0. Kaseya holds a 0.3% mindshare in NMS, compared to OpenText’s 0.2% mindshare. Additionally, 83% of Kaseya users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 75% of OpenText users who would recommend it.
Kaseya Traverse
Read 8 Kaseya Traverse reviews
  • 619 Views
  • 520 Comparison Views
83% willing to recommend
OpenText Network Operations...
Read 3 OpenText Network Operations Management reviews
  • 394 Views
  • 323 Comparison Views
75% willing to recommend
 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report
Executive SummaryUpdated on Oct 10, 2024

Kaseya Traverse and OpenText Network Operations Management compete in the network monitoring and operations space. OpenText Network Operations Management appears to have an edge with its extensive features, providing more value despite a higher cost.

Features: Kaseya Traverse offers essential network monitoring capabilities, ease of use, and integration with existing systems. OpenText Network Operations Management provides comprehensive network operations features, advanced analytics, and scalability for complex environments.

Room for Improvement: Kaseya Traverse could enhance advanced analytics, system scalability, and integration capabilities. OpenText Network Operations Management might improve deployment complexity, initial setup cost, and the user interface.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Kaseya Traverse is known for straightforward deployment and responsive customer service. OpenText Network Operations Management has a more intricate setup but offers dedicated support for optimized deployment.

Pricing and ROI: Kaseya Traverse offers competitive pricing making it accessible with promising ROI for smaller to midsize enterprises. OpenText Network Operations Management justifies a higher initial setup cost with long-term ROI gains for larger organizations with expansive network needs.

DOWNLOAD THE COMPLETE REPORT
To learn more, read our detailed Kaseya Traverse vs. OpenText Network Operations Management Report (Updated: July 2025).
Buyer's Guide
Kaseya Traverse vs. OpenText Network Operations Management
July 2025
Download the complete report
Helped 865,384 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

Kaseya Traverse
Ranking in Network Monitoring Software
56th
Average Rating
6.6
Reviews Sentiment
6.5
Number of Reviews
8
Ranking in other categories
Cloud Monitoring Software (32nd)
OpenText Network Operations...
Ranking in Network Monitoring Software
64th
Average Rating
8.6
Reviews Sentiment
7.7
Number of Reviews
3
Ranking in other categories
Network Management Applications (20th)
 

Mindshare comparison

As of August 2025, in the Network Monitoring Software category, the mindshare of Kaseya Traverse is 0.3%, up from 0.3% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of OpenText Network Operations Management is 0.2%, up from 0.1% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Network Monitoring Software
 

Featured Reviews

AMMAR HUMAIDY HUSIN - PeerSpot reviewer
Automation increases efficiency, but pricing needs to be more competitive
Improvement is needed in making it cheaper, of course. I am not emphasizing making it cheaper, however, it should be more competitive with other products. The product itself is very good and helpful for me as a customer. The issue always is the price, as we cannot beat most of our competitors on pricing alone. If a product is just nice to have, not essential like an antivirus, if it's not really competitive with pricing, we cannot sell it.
Read full review
AhmedBahgat - PeerSpot reviewer
Dynamic discovery and effective network topology make IT monitoring valuable
The solution enables dynamic discovery and incorporates a powerful configuration management database, CMDB, along with a strong correlation engine. It covers the entire span of the infrastructure, including servers and network operations. It also adapts well to different environments, showing network topology effectively, making the network monitoring tool quite valuable.
Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"Kaseya Traverse is a very stable solution and very sustainable in terms of what the market wants, what is out there, price-wise and functionality features. They're quite competitive and they are always innovating."
"If I want to automate the management and maintenance of my server automatically, this product is a good use case for that."
"We have found the solution to be very flexible to our requirements. We have been able to configure it on-premise effectively when we were using less of the cloud."
"It's a simple and humble tool."
"The remote support and data collection features are great."
"Everything is running seamlessly on the solution, to the point where you don't see any gap."
"Most of the features are pretty good and the solution is user friendly."
"Automating processes is crucial for me, so the automation part stands out."
More Kaseya Traverse pros
"The solution enables dynamic discovery and incorporates a powerful configuration management database, CMDB, along with a strong correlation engine."
"We can detect non-compliant devices and automate remediation actions to cover the gap in the configuration standards."
"The solution enables dynamic discovery and incorporates a powerful configuration management database, CMDB, along with a strong correlation engine."
"When it comes to customization, Micro Focus is more mature than its competitors."
 

Cons

"Reporting is tedious and not organized in the way customers expect."
"Kaseya Traverse can improve by adding a Service Map to help us create a configuration management database (CMDB), this would be helpful for us."
"Dashboards and Central Protection were an issue. Also, database monitoring was not there. Even though they said that it was there at an additional cost, that tool was very basic. We couldn't have device configuration backup also."
"In terms of what could be improved, we are innovating all the time, as well as having a look at different avenues so that the strategy follows the structure. I think the software is still a little bit too new to actually fully asses what it has."
"Improvement is needed in making it cheaper."
"Reporting is a bit difficult."
"However, the issue lies in the adequacy of the responses to my questions, which are usually not up to par."
"The tool needs to have some AI capabilities, which it lacks currently."
More Kaseya Traverse cons
"Micro Focus Network Management doesn't support end-to-end monitoring of cloud infrastructure. Micro Focus might have different cloud solutions for cloud automation and hybrid cloud management. There are a lot of products that also support automation. That is different, but it should monitor the cloud from an IT operations management perspective."
"The user interface is outdated and needs improvement, especially for service and topology maps."
"It may need a more customizable UI."
"The user interface is outdated and needs improvement, especially for service and topology maps."
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The solution is not cheap, but it is not too expensive."
"The price depends on whether you are monitoring different applications, especially in bulk, and depends on what you're doing. If you're monitoring one endpoint, it will cost you 150 ZAR."
"Micro Focus' price is on the higher side, but there are other products like CA products and IBM that are more expensive. At the same time, you have to compare the maturity level of the solutions."
report
See which vendors are best for you
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Network Monitoring Software solutions are best for your needs.
See recommendations
865,384 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Computer Software Company
25%
Non Profit
10%
Wholesaler/Distributor
9%
Government
9%
No data available
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
No data available
 

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Kaseya Traverse?
The remote support and data collection features are great.
See all answers
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Kaseya Traverse?
The solution is not cheap, but it is not too expensive. We pay an annual license fee. There are no additional fees associated with the product.
See all answers
What needs improvement with Kaseya Traverse?
Improvement is needed in making it cheaper, of course. I am not emphasizing making it cheaper, however, it should be more competitive with other products. The product itself is very good and helpfu...
See all answers
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Micro Focus Network Operations Management?
The price is reasonable based on the agreement.
See all answers
What needs improvement with Micro Focus Network Operations Management?
The user interface is outdated and needs improvement, especially for service and topology maps. The ease of generating dashboards for different situations by users is critical for my environment. I...
See all answers
What is your primary use case for Micro Focus Network Operations Management?
I use the solution as the main vehicle to monitor and alert about events in the IT environment. I use it for IT monitoring.
See all answers
 

Comparisons

PRTG Network Monitor vs Kaseya Traverse Logo
PRTG Network Monitor vs Kaseya Traverse
Compared 66% of the time
Auvik Network Management (ANM) vs Kaseya Traverse Logo
Auvik Network Management (ANM) vs Kaseya Traverse
Compared 34% of the time
More Kaseya Traverse Competitors
ManageEngine OpManager vs OpenText Network Operations Management Logo
ManageEngine OpManager vs OpenText Network Operations Management
Compared 100% of the time
More OpenText Network Operations Management Competitors
 

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide
Kaseya Traverse
August 2025
Kaseya Traverse reportDownload Kaseya Traverse product report
Buyer's Guide
Network Management Applications
July 2025
OpenText Network Operations Management reportDownload OpenText Network Operations Management product report
 

Also Known As

No data available
Micro Focus Network Operations Management
 

Overview

Immediately identify impacted IT services using insights based on rich data analytics of events such as SNMP traps, Windows events and Syslogs. Resolve faults quickly via NetFlow enabled root cause analysis across cloud, on-premise, hybrid cloud and virtualized IT environments.

Kaseya

Network management solutions are continually called onto to adapt to new technologies, while retaining value of existing ones, including: SDNs, multiple connection methods to the cloud and Internet, remote sites, and WiFi networks. All of these technologies require closer collaboration between network engineering and operations because of their dynamic nature, which requires fast and deep understanding of the technologies to operate effectively.

OpenText
 

Sample Customers

UltiSat, Clear Concepts, nVidia, United States Postal Service, Cisco, Redbox, Spark Digital, People's Bank & Trust
Information Not Available
Buyer's Guide
Kaseya Traverse vs. OpenText Network Operations Management
July 2025
Free Report: Kaseya Traverse vs. OpenText Network Operations Management
Find out what your peers are saying about Kaseya Traverse vs. OpenText Network Operations Management and other solutions. Updated: July 2025.
DOWNLOAD NOW
865,384 professionals have used our research since 2012.
See our Kaseya Traverse vs. OpenText Network Operations Management report.
See our list of best Network Monitoring Software vendors.

We monitor all Network Monitoring Software reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.