Jitterbit Vinyl vs Pillir comparison

Jitterbit and Pillir are both solutions in the Rapid Application Development Software category. Jitterbit is ranked #27, while Pillir is ranked #42. Jitterbit holds a 0.6% mindshare in RADS, compared to Pillir’s 0.2% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of Jitterbit users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of Pillir users who would recommend it.

Jitterbit Vinyl

Read 31 Jitterbit Vinyl reviews

1,044 Views
877 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Pillir

Read 2 Pillir reviews

206 Views
185 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Jitterbit Vinyl

Pillir

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Sep 18, 2024

Jitterbit Vinyl and Pillir are both popular tools for enterprise integration. Jitterbit Vinyl often has higher marks for features while Pillir stands out with ease of deployment and flexibility.

Features: Jitterbit Vinyl offers robust mapping and data transformation capabilities, making it favored for complex integration scenarios. Pillir is appreciated for its low-code application development and real-time monitoring features. Users tend to find Jitterbit Vinyl more suitable for detailed, technical integrations while Pillir is acclaimed for its adaptability and rapid development environment.

Room for Improvement: Users of Jitterbit Vinyl often request better documentation and smoother updates to enhance user experience. Pillir users have pointed out the need for broader third-party integration options and more comprehensive analytics. Both products focus on different areas for enhancement.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Jitterbit Vinyl is known for its detailed deployment model, which can be complex but is supported by strong customer service. Pillir is praised for its straightforward deployment process and responsive customer support.

Pricing and ROI: Jitterbit Vinyl's initial setup costs can be higher, but users generally feel the ROI compensates over time due to its powerful features. Pillir offers a more cost-effective setup with a faster, albeit slightly lower, ROI.

To learn more, read our detailed Jitterbit Vinyl vs. Pillir Report (Updated: September 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Jitterbit Vinyl vs. Pillir

September 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 869,566 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Jitterbit Vinyl

Ranking in Rapid Application Development Software

27th

Ranking in Low-Code Development Platforms

24th

Average Rating

8.8

Reviews Sentiment

7.7

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No-Code Development Platforms (16th)

Pillir

Ranking in Rapid Application Development Software

42nd

Ranking in Low-Code Development Platforms

50th

Average Rating

10.0

Reviews Sentiment

8.3

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of October 2025, in the Rapid Application Development Software category, the mindshare of Jitterbit Vinyl is 0.6%, up from 0.3% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Pillir is 0.2%, up from 0.1% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Rapid Application Development Software Market Share Distribution
Product	Market Share (%)
Jitterbit Vinyl	0.6%
Pillir	0.2%
Other	99.2%

Rapid Application Development Software

Featured Reviews

reviewer2208660

Mobile Dog Product Manager at BioPet Laboratories

It has sped up the app development process, enabling us to release a public version of the app much quicker

Some aspects of VINYL are limiting from a B2C standpoint. For example, it would be nice to have more flexibility with what the VINYL parameters allow us to develop within the app. It is difficult to think of an example off the top of my head, but there have been times when we couldn't develop something a particular way because VINYL didn't support it. However, the team Zudy assigned to us has been great about adjusting and finding ways around these hurdles.

Read full review

it_user130401

Application Developer Manager at Cerner Corporation

Helpful dashboard, supports offline capabilities for SAP, professional support, and a simple pricing model

I believe that this is the only product in the market that truly supports offline capabilities in an SAP environment. We have people going through all of their shifts without connectivity, yet it automatically later synchronizes well with SAP, without creating extra documents or anything like that. The ability to take ABAP code and automatically convert it to a mobile app and then adjust it to our needs is something that I haven't seen in any other low-code solution on the market, and it has been life-changing for us. I love how easy it is to manage the design of the process using drag and drop. I know they are working to make the developer experience even better, and I'm very excited about it. The modernizer element that converts existing ABAP business logic to the cloud-native mobile-friendly solution is a very powerful tool that I haven't seen in the market.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"It's made things seamless and it's more efficient, and there's an audit trail where it wasn't there before."

"There are two most valuable features: one is the ability to pull data from a bunch of different places and put them together. And the second is the speed at which you can get a new app developed. So instead of waiting months for this new app to come out, if you have an internal team putting it together, you can roll it out in weeks. I've even seen days. It's incredible how fast you can make changes."

"It's customizable to whatever you see might use it for... It's very user-friendly, and the front-end is exactly what we need to see, very simple. It can get more complicated too, if those are the needs."

"The Lite Integration is really the key thing. You're able to attach the Vinyl software to a variety of different systems very easily and pull data together in a way that is really difficult to do using traditional technology... Also, the fact that it's a no-code platform also makes it easier for people to understand and deal with internally, to continue to build applications and modify existing applications."

"The product is super fast at getting things done."

"VINYL has given us the ability to really improve the speed with which we deploy releases and respond to the good ideas that our people have."

"It's like breaking apart coding and development into an ultra-configuration tool... It really is flexible."

"It allows us higher visibility into our data, which allows us to data-check faster, and validate data that we had not been able to validate, prior."

More Jitterbit Vinyl pros

"I love how they took the MIT Scratch concept and implemented it into the in-app backend. It makes the app creation so much more intuitive and easy to use."

"I believe that this is the only product in the market that truly supports offline capabilities in an SAP environment."

Cons

"The features that I'd like to see in VINYL next would be the ability to have more control over, or have a rule-based control over column headings and column labels."

"Once or twice, when a new version of VINYL comes out, it has had a negative impact on a feature. However, we do everything in a test environment. Unless we miss something in test, we don't go live with it if it isn't perfect. Zudy hasn't had too many stumbles along the way, but there have been a couple times, and it's been minor."

"If it could be prettier, it might be a bit more attractive on the business side. The most meaningful improvement might be done in some of the aesthetics of the reporting and dashboarding."

"Eventually, a nicer way to create certain features, like the way that we create PDFs, would help. Sometimes the way that it resizes when I have multiple windows up, could also be better. It's minor stuff though. It's edge-case stuff."

"There are a lot of almost "hidden" features captured in these Edge Case settings... If you want a scroll bar at the bottom, instead of having it select rows to show, you have to select Disable Panel Location Service, which doesn't sound at all like what it's supposed to do. Naming conventions could be changed a little bit."

"The calendar has room for improvement, but that's what they're going to be working on next, to make a Gantt chart."

"The documentation isn't everything it could be, and the user forum is not always the most helpful."

"Some new features I think I'd like to see is visibility into running jobs so that we can see what the status is, or it's not stuck in its process and doing its thing, or how much longer it's going to take. I'd also like to see a native calendaring function so we can put calendars into our apps with maybe even recurring tasks or appointments and that sort of thing. We'd also like to see multi-select lists. The users being able to pick multiple things to filter on and get a list and be able to export that list."

More Jitterbit Vinyl cons

"While we're not in a place of letting LOB analysts build apps, at some point, we may want to give them a bit more freedom - as long as we can limit their ability to harm the ERP data. I would like to see more tools pertaining to this area."

"The modernizer element should convert a higher percentage of the ABAP code, moving it from approximately 75%, closer to 100%."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"Compared to if I used traditional methods, such as hiring developers and setting up systems, VINYL is costing me less than half of what it would normally cost."

"We also pay for the managed services help that we get from them. But, to me, it is a very effective cost model. Licenses are relatively inexpensive, then you pay by the drink in terms of the managed services that you are going to need, which has been great. We figure out where we want to apply those services and try to be pretty diligent about managing the costs there."

"Pricing and licensing are expensive."

"We haven't really had any issues with pricing. Like with any good partnership, you're paying a fair and good price for a good product. That's where great partnerships are developed, when one side doesn't feel like they won in a deal; when both sides feel like they won. That's where we are with Zudy VINYL."

"The licensing costs we pay are, I believe about 5,000 a month. That's every quarter. We've been doing it for about a year now, and the prices have remained steady. We feel it's a reasonable cost for what we're getting because it's unlimited users. So as big as you want to make it, you're not constrained by a per-user licensing cost or any of those other restrictions, so that's going to stifle your development."

"We have seen a 30 percent decrease in time for some of our workflows."

"Pricing was actually one of the things that drew us to the product initially... the way it was licensed at the time, I got a flat monthly fee from Zudy for the Vinyl product, which allowed me to basically have unlimited use of it... We have an annual license, we pay monthly. It's very competitive and very worthwhile given the return we get out of it."

"Our licensing costs are approximately 100K annually, and from my perspective, that really is quite the value with the flexibility and what we're getting from the product."

More Jitterbit Vinyl pricing and cost advice

"It is straightforward consumption based on the number of end-users."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Rapid Application Development Software solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

869,566 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Computer Software Company

15%

Consumer Goods Company

Manufacturing Company

Financial Services Firm

No data available

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	11
Midsize Enterprise	9
Large Enterprise	14

No data available

Comparisons

Microsoft Power Apps vs Jitterbit Vinyl

Compared 55% of the time

QuickBase vs Jitterbit Vinyl

Compared 45% of the time

More Jitterbit Vinyl Competitors

Microsoft Power Apps vs Pillir

Compared 100% of the time

More Pillir Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Jitterbit Vinyl

September 2025

Download Jitterbit Vinyl product report

Buyer's Guide

Rapid Application Development Software

September 2025

Download Pillir product report

Also Known As

No data available

appsFreedom

Overview

Jitterbit's Vinyl (previously Zudy) is an enterprise low-code application platform that makes it easy to build scalable, end-to-end apps that are easily integrated with new and existing systems. Designed for large enterprises to solve complex business problems at scale, Vinyl empowers anyone to create fully integrated, bi-directional applications in weeks. Powerful enough for Full Stack Developers, intuitive enough for Citizen Developers/Business Technologists, Vinyl empowers you to create secure apps that run on any device, automate any business process, and integrate any data source without coding.

Create fully integrated, bi-directional applications
Utilize guided development and visual rule builders
Predictable pricing with no per-user fees
Integrate the entire ecosystem without impacting source data
Protect apps with enterprise-grade security
Integrate real-time data
Deploy apps via enterprise cloud, on-premise or hosted
Improve customer digital experience

For more information: www.jitterbit.com/product/viny

Jitterbit

Pillir is the developer of a low-code/no-code, cloud-native platform that enables organizations to develop mission-critical apps 20 times faster than traditional methods, leveraging the power of SAP’s digital core from any device, with or without connectivity. Pillir’s platform automatically converts legacy custom business processes to modern cloud-native applications, available on the web and via any mobile device. It enables organizations at any stage of their SAP journey to accelerate their digital transformation, enabling innovation at the edge while maintaining a clean SAP digital core.

Pillir

Sample Customers

Aetna, Alnylam Pharmaceuticals Inc., Alvarez and Marsal, Audacy, Barstool Sports, Brooks Brothers, Cal-Maine Foods Inc., CNH Financial, Collette Travel, Darn Tough Vermont, DXL, Fresh Direct, iHeartMedia, Intra-Cellular Therapies, JBS Foods, J.Crew, Kraft Sports Group, MEMIC, New England Patriots, PGT Trucking Inc., United Healthcare, Worley

Dole packaed food, Par Pacific, Brown Forman (Jack Daniels and other brands), Mobile Mini, Nabors

Buyer's Guide

Jitterbit Vinyl vs. Pillir

September 2025

Free Report: Jitterbit Vinyl vs. Pillir

Find out what your peers are saying about Jitterbit Vinyl vs. Pillir and other solutions. Updated: September 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

869,566 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Jitterbit Vinyl vs. Pillir report.

See our list of best Rapid Application Development Software vendors and best Low-Code Development Platforms vendors.

We monitor all Rapid Application Development Software reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.