Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

Jamf Pro vs iVerify comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive Summary

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

iVerify
Ranking in Mobile Device Management (MDM)
15th
Average Rating
0.0
Number of Reviews
0
Ranking in other categories
Mobile Threat Defense (6th)
Jamf Pro
Ranking in Mobile Device Management (MDM)
1st
Average Rating
9.4
Reviews Sentiment
6.2
Number of Reviews
110
Ranking in other categories
Enterprise Mobility Management (EMM) (4th), AI Customer Experience Personalization (6th)
 

Mindshare comparison

As of January 2026, in the Mobile Device Management (MDM) category, the mindshare of iVerify is 2.0%, up from 0.6% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Jamf Pro is 13.6%, down from 29.0% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Mobile Device Management (MDM) Market Share Distribution
ProductMarket Share (%)
Jamf Pro13.6%
iVerify2.0%
Other84.4%
Mobile Device Management (MDM)
 

Featured Reviews

Use iVerify?
Leave a review
Mohd Javed Khan - PeerSpot reviewer
Lead Senior Consultant at Truglobal
Has supported centralized management of all Apple devices while ensuring high security and compliance
I have not encountered many areas for improvement, but there are feature requests submitted to Jamf Pro for reporting purposes that they are working on. Jamf Pro continues to increase its capabilities. One improvement I would recommend is integrating Jamf Setup Manager as an inbuilt feature. Currently, it is a separate tool that needs to be installed and integrated with Jamf Pro. Having zero-touch capability as an inbuilt feature would eliminate the need to work with scripts and configurations. The pricing of Jamf Pro is relatively high. Jamf Pro does not have a fixed price for all organizations. Based on my experience, they offer discounts inconsistently. Due to the high pricing, many organizations are moving to InTune and Workspace ONE. There are many other tools in the market for Mac OS device management, such as ScaleFusion, Addigy, and Kandji. Small organizations are moving to these alternatives, and larger organizations with fewer security concerns are moving to InTune. Despite being expensive, I still rate Jamf Pro highly because of its security features and comprehensive management capabilities for Mac OS devices.
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Mobile Device Management (MDM) solutions are best for your needs.
880,844 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
No data available
Computer Software Company
12%
Media Company
9%
Financial Services Firm
9%
University
8%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
No data available
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business38
Midsize Enterprise41
Large Enterprise63
 

Questions from the Community

Ask a question
Earn 20 points
What do you like most about Jamf Pro?
The most valuable features of Jamf Pro for me are the device locator, which helps find missing iPads, and the ability to remotely manage and disable devices.
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Jamf Pro?
My experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing for Jamf Pro was good compared to other service providers.
What needs improvement with Jamf Pro?
I have not encountered many areas for improvement, but there are feature requests submitted to Jamf Pro for reporting purposes that they are working on. Jamf Pro continues to increase its capabilit...
 

Comparisons

 

Also Known As

No data available
JAMF Software Casper Suite
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Information Not Available
Xero, National Geographic, Oxford University, Via, University of Wisconsin-Eau Claire, Fallon, Cabela's
Find out what your peers are saying about JAMF, Microsoft, Cisco and others in Mobile Device Management (MDM). Updated: December 2025.
880,844 professionals have used our research since 2012.