Ivanti Patch for Configuration Manager [EOL] vs Microsoft Configuration Manager comparison

Ivanti and Microsoft are both solutions in the Patch Management category. Additionally, 100% of Ivanti users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 91% of Microsoft users who would recommend it.

Ivanti Patch for Configurat...

Read 2 Ivanti Patch for Configuration Manager [EOL] reviews

100% willing to recommend

Microsoft Configuration Man...

Read 86 Microsoft Configuration Manager reviews

15,541 Views
4,973 Comparison Views

91% willing to recommend

Ivanti Patch for Configurat...

Microsoft Configuration Man...

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Aug 4, 2026

Microsoft Configuration Manager and Ivanti Patch for Configuration Manager EOL compete in the system and patch management category. Microsoft Configuration Manager holds an advantage in overall system management due to its broader capabilities, whereas Ivanti Patch stands out for its specialized patch management features.

Features: Microsoft Configuration Manager includes software distribution, endpoint protection, and comprehensive IT management solutions. Ivanti Patch for Configuration Manager EOL focuses on specialized patch management with robust updating capabilities essential for system security. While Microsoft Configuration Manager offers wide-ranging management tasks, Ivanti Patch provides specific patching enhancements within the Microsoft ecosystem.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Microsoft Configuration Manager is well-regarded for its streamlined setup process and extensive support documentation, which aids smoother deployment. Ivanti Patch for Configuration Manager EOL has a straightforward deployment process tailored to its patch-specific capabilities, requiring minimal system configuration. Both products offer customer support, although Microsoft extends more comprehensive resources covering multiple management tasks.

Pricing and ROI: Microsoft Configuration Manager's initial cost is justified by its expansive capabilities and can lead to higher ROI through holistic management. Ivanti Patch for Configuration Manager EOL offers a separate investment, enhancing ROI by reducing system vulnerabilities. Despite higher initial pricing for Microsoft Configuration Manager, its value lies in broad management capabilities, whereas Ivanti Patch offers a cost-effective method for patch management enhancement.

To learn more, read our detailed Ivanti Patch for Configuration Manager [EOL] vs. Microsoft Configuration Manager Report (Updated: June 2026).

Buyer's Guide

Ivanti Patch for Configuration Manager [EOL] vs. Microsoft Configuration Manager

June 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 908,745 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Ivanti Patch for Configurat...

Average Rating

7.6

Reviews Sentiment

6.4

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Microsoft Configuration Man...

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

6.6

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Software Distribution (2nd), Server Monitoring (5th), Configuration Management (4th), Patch Management (2nd)

Featured Reviews

reviewer2019633

Director at a tech services company with 1,001-5,000 employees

Provides detection logic that tells us which customer will record an update and is less expensive than other solutions

I haven't had experience with customer service and support, however, we did have an advisory case with one of their technical support staff. We were publishing and getting the full metadata for the patch. We were getting the full updates for the patch release. There was confusion as to why we were seeing that in the SCCM, instead of in the full metadata patch. The support person was able to help us in understanding what we were doing wrong, highlighting it could be a certificate issue. We generated a new certificate, and after they were applied, the issue was fixed. Overall, I would rate their customer service and support a five out of five.

Read full review

Narendar S

Senior System Engineer at a tech services company with 10,001+ employees

Centralized endpoint control has streamlined deployments and improved security compliance

In my experience, the best features of Microsoft Configuration Manager are software deployments and updates, OSD, hardware and software inventory, compliance and configuration baseline, reporting and monitoring, and integration with Intune hybrid management. These features make endpoint management efficient and scalable. The feature I rely on the most day-to-day is software deployment and patch management. It keeps endpoints updated and secure with minimal manual effort. Inventory and compliance monitoring are also important, but daily deployments are critical. Microsoft Configuration Manager has had a significant positive impact on our organization in several ways: improved efficiency, enhanced security and compliance, standardization, scalability, and visibility reporting. Overall, Microsoft Configuration Manager has helped us save time, reduce risk, improve operational efficiency, and maintain strong control over our endpoints. One of the biggest impacts Microsoft Configuration Manager has had on efficiency is the reduced manual work for software deployment and patching. For example, deploying a new application or security updates to hundreds or thousands of devices previously required several days of manual effort, including running scripts, checking devices individually, and validating installation. With Microsoft Configuration Manager, these tasks are automated and managed, allowing deployments to complete in hours rather than days. We also have automated reporting for deployment success and compliance which saved the IT team significant time that used to be spent gathering and reconciling inventory data from multiple tools.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"This solution is stable."

"The most valuable feature of Ivanti Patch for SCCM is the detection logic."

"The major features of this product are the reporting tools. The most valuable features are package deployment and application deployment. Security management is also good because any vulnerability will be identified, and you can fix it. It's the best tool because you never know what kind of client you will have. For example, you may have your offices in low bandwidth remote areas. But it's achievable because it accommodates the bandwidth that you have available. Microsoft Endpoint Configuration Manager is an excellent reporting tool for your environment. If you want to know the details about the hardware configuration, software configuration, what is causing a problem, or when a new feature update comes in for Windows, even that goes on SCCM itself. A lot of deployment stuff."

"The initial setup is fairly straightforward."

"SCCM is a stable solution."

"The solution enables significant streamlining and reduces resources from a personnel perspective."

"The solution has a very good set of features."

"The most valuable feature of Microsoft Endpoint Configuration Manager is it's incredibly simple to configure and execute changes in bulk, allowing for seamless deployment. With this solution, you can easily track the status of all modifications and send them with ease, making it a comprehensive and efficient solution for any necessary adjustments."

"We are using Microsoft Endpoint Configuration Manager in our organization for patch deployment, and we additionally deploy and manage Microsoft antivirus solutions to most of the desktops and the servers which we have."

"The most valuable feature of Microsoft Endpoint Configuration Manager is patch management."

More Microsoft Configuration Manager pros

Cons

"We have some problems with patches not installing successfully."

"In future releases, I would like to see improvements with the feature upgrade for the SCCM, which Microsoft has already integrated. Currently, Ivanti does not give us information about the enablement package."

"The downside of Microsoft Endpoint Configuration Manager is it's an on-premise-based solution. With the pandemic coming on board the need to support users across the globe has increased. For a while, we would use the in-built Microsoft Teams screen sharing feature but the disadvantage of that is you cannot perform privileged access. Microsoft does not give you access to that. That's where you need cloud-based tools, such as BeyondTrust or Freshservice."

"I think SCCM can improve whatever details they shared with the integration partner. There was a lot of junk software and data."

"The time the solution takes for updating systems could be quicker. For example, the system information status is not updating as it should. Additionally, the database synchronization querying is slow and could be improved."

"I would like to see an agentless version of the solution."

"There were misconfigurations by our team rather than issues with the product itself. However, it does seem a bit buggy from time to time, based on what I have heard."

"The solution is on-premises. The cloud version of the product, if a person needs to be on the cloud, would be InTune, which already exists as an option. SCCM doesn't need to offer cloud features for this reason."

"It would be better if automation options were available."

"Regarding this, I'd like to mention the agent situation. When the agent on an end-user device is not functioning correctly, it can be quite problematic. It would be highly beneficial if there were a self-healing mechanism in place. Essentially, if the agent becomes corrupted or encounters issues, it should be able to rectify itself autonomously. This is particularly critical because, in order to utilize a tool like MECM (assuming you're referring to Microsoft System Center Configuration Manager), we need to deploy agents, known as AsMs, on all the devices we use, such as Windows 10 or Windows Server. Sometimes, when we deploy configurations or updates, they don't apply properly due to agent issues. This issue has been present since we began using MECM around 23 years ago. Unfortunately, there is currently no built-in mechanism for the agent to detect its own problems and initiate self-repair. Microsoft doesn’t have any feature to scan vulnerabilities and hence, they could include those."

More Microsoft Configuration Manager cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"We do not have a license with Ivanti, instead we buy just the plugins for the consoles, making it a much less expensive option versus other solutions."

"Pricing and licensing are horrible. You have to not look at dollar value to use SCCM. It's super-duper expensive but it works. The acquisition cost is expensive, it's labor-intensive. But it works."

"Overall, I think it's fine. It's pretty much in-line because there are ways to offset it with the Office 365 licensing."

"The solution is expensive. Microsoft Configuration Manager would likely be considered high-priced for small businesses because they may not fully utilize all of its features and capabilities."

"Pricing and licensing are a downside of SCCM. It's expensive. I'd have to confirm this, but I think they changed the licensing to core-based instead of socket-based. It's not cheap, because you have to buy the software, you have to buy SQL. Another thing we learned from talking to Microsoft is that they provide you a license for SQL if you run it on the same box as the primary server. If you run it outside that box, you have to buy SQL. Microsoft does recommend you running it on the same box because of performance. But then, in order to run SQL, SCCM, and everything on the same box, you better have some resources. It's an expensive solution. There's no doubt about it."

"The solution operates on a licensing model that can be expensive."

"There is an annual license needed to use the solution."

"Its licensing is quite complicated because we are getting the license not only for SCCM but for the full Microsoft package. We don't need to pay for a separate license. We need to have one license that includes everything we need, such as Windows, Microsoft 365, SCCM, encryption, and so on. So, we don't have a specific price for it. Perhaps, it is good that it includes the full suite of licensing of Microsoft. It is expensive, but we are getting a lot of features."

"We use the tool's free license. It is expensive."

More Microsoft Configuration Manager pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Patch Management solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

908,745 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

17%

Legal Firm

11%

Real Estate/Law Firm

Media Company

Financial Services Firm

12%

Government

Manufacturing Company

Construction Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	20
Midsize Enterprise	13
Large Enterprise	69

Questions from the Community

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

How does Ansible compare to Microsoft Endpoint Configuration Manager (SCCM)?

Microsoft Endpoint Configuration Manager takes knowledge and research to properly configure. The length of time that the set up will take depends on the kind of technical architecture that your org...

See all answers

How to choose between ManageEngine Desktop Central and Microsoft Endpoint Configuration Manager (formerly SCCM)?

ManageEngine Desktop Central is very easy to set up, is scalable, stable, and also has very good patch management. What I like most about ManageEngine is that I can log on to every PC very easily a...

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for SCCM?

The setup cost is considered sufficient. It is not significant enough for us to consider a change at the moment.

See all answers

Comparisons

ManageEngine Patch Connect Plus vs Ivanti Patch for Configuration Manager [EOL]

Compared 10% of the time

Absolute Secure Endpoint vs Ivanti Patch for Configuration Manager [EOL]

Compared 10% of the time

Ivanti Neurons for Patch Intelligence vs Ivanti Patch for Configuration Manager [EOL]

Compared 9% of the time

SolarWinds Patch Manager vs Ivanti Patch for Configuration Manager [EOL]

Compared 8% of the time

ManageEngine Patch Manager Plus vs Ivanti Patch for Configuration Manager [EOL]

Compared 7% of the time

More Ivanti Patch for Configuration Manager [EOL] Competitors

Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform vs Microsoft Configuration Manager

Compared 6% of the time

Tanium vs Microsoft Configuration Manager

Compared 4% of the time

PDQ Deploy vs Microsoft Configuration Manager

Compared 3% of the time

BigFix vs Microsoft Configuration Manager

Compared 3% of the time

Microsoft Intune vs Microsoft Configuration Manager

Compared 3% of the time

More Microsoft Configuration Manager Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Patch Management

July 2026

Ivanti Patch for Configuration Manager [EOL] report

Download Ivanti Patch for Configuration Manager [EOL] product report

Buyer's Guide

Microsoft Configuration Manager

July 2026

Download Microsoft Configuration Manager product report

Also Known As

Patch for SCCM, Shavlik Patch for SCCM, Ivanti Patch for MEM

Microsoft Endpoint Configuration Manager, System Center Configuration Manager (SCCM ), Microsoft SMS

Overview

Ivanti Patch for Configuration Manager enhances Microsoft System Center Configuration Manager by automating patch management. It strengthens security by streamlining processes and ensuring systems are up-to-date and protected against vulnerabilities.

Utilizing Ivanti Patch for Configuration Manager ensures robust patch management by integrating seamlessly with Microsoft SCCM. It simplifies identifying and deploying critical patches, significantly reducing system vulnerabilities. With advanced automation capabilities, it eases the workload on IT teams while ensuring high levels of compliance and security. Its real-time data reporting enhances visibility, enabling informed decision-making. The tool seamlessly updates systems without disrupting users, making it essential for maintaining business continuity.

What are the key features of Ivanti Patch for Configuration Manager?

Automated Patch Management: Simplifies and accelerates the patch deployment process.
Seamless Integration: Works directly with Microsoft SCCM for streamlined operations.
Real-Time Reporting: Offers detailed insights into patch statuses and deployment success.
Security Compliance: Ensures adherence to industry standards and policies.

What benefits or ROI should users expect?

Reduced Security Risks: Minimizes vulnerabilities through timely patch updates.
Increased Efficiency: Saves time and resources through automation and integration.
Enhanced Compliance: Meets regulatory requirements with consistent patching strategies.
Improved System Stability: Maintains optimal performance and uptime.

Implementation of Ivanti Patch for Configuration Manager is seen across industries requiring stringent compliance and security protocols, such as healthcare and finance. In healthcare, it helps protect sensitive patient data, while in finance, it secures critical transaction systems. It supports diverse environments, ensuring patching needs are effectively managed.

Ivanti

Microsoft Configuration Manager streamlines IT management with features such as software deployment, patch management, and automation, centralizing operations for Windows environments. Integration with Microsoft products allows efficient oversight of workstations and servers.

Microsoft Configuration Manager provides comprehensive IT management, offering software deployment, patch management, and application pushing. Automation reduces manual tasks, ensuring consistency across systems. Centralized management enables standardized OS deployments, application updates, and configuration integrity. Integration with Microsoft products facilitates seamless operations, while hardware and software inventory, compliance reporting, and remote control functions enhance IT management. Users seek improvements in application deployment for those without deep scripting knowledge and desire better WSUS control, PowerShell and Intune integration, Linux compatibility, and user interface enhancements. Performance improvements are requested for remote user management and third-party application support.

What features enhance Microsoft Configuration Manager?

Software Deployment: Efficiently distribute software across large networks.
Patch Management: Automate and streamline update processes for security and functionality.
Automation Capabilities: Reduce manual effort and enhance consistency in IT tasks.
Centralized Management: Standardize OS deployments and application updates.
Integration with Microsoft Products: Seamless operation with existing Microsoft infrastructure.
Hardware and Software Inventory: Comprehensive tracking for assets and resources.
Compliance Reporting: Ensure compliance with internal and external standards.
Remote Control Functions: Enhance support and troubleshooting capabilities.

What benefits should users expect when evaluating Microsoft Configuration Manager?

Decreased Manual Work: Automation reduces time spent on repetitive tasks.
Enhanced Security: Automated patch management keeps systems secure.
Consistent Configurations: Centralized updates ensure uniformity across systems.
Improved Integration: Seamless operation within Microsoft ecosystems boosts productivity.
Comprehensive Oversight: Detailed inventory and reporting tools aid in strategic planning.
Streamlined Support: Remote capabilities improve IT support and user satisfaction.

Microsoft Configuration Manager is widely implemented in organizations to manage Windows workstations and servers. It is essential for deploying operating systems and applications, managing software updates, and conducting hardware and software inventories. The tool is crucial for endpoint and configuration management, ensuring compliance, and automating processes like patching and vulnerability management. Industries such as finance, healthcare, and education rely on Microsoft Configuration Manager to keep systems secure and operational, adapting it to address their specific needs and challenges in maintaining diversified IT environments.

Microsoft

Sample Customers

University of Pittsburgh

Bank Alfalah Ltd., Wªrth Handelsges.m.b.H, Dimension Data, Japan Business Systems, St. Lucie County Public Schools, MISC Berhad

Buyer's Guide

Ivanti Patch for Configuration Manager [EOL] vs. Microsoft Configuration Manager

June 2026

Free Report: Ivanti Patch for Configuration Manager [EOL] vs. Microsoft Configuration Manager

Find out what your peers are saying about Ivanti Patch for Configuration Manager [EOL] vs. Microsoft Configuration Manager and other solutions. Updated: June 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

908,745 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Ivanti Patch for Configuration Manager [EOL] vs. Microsoft Configuration Manager report.

See our list of best Patch Management vendors.

We monitor all Patch Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.