Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

Infor Governance, Risk, and Compliance vs One Identity Safeguard comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive Summary

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

Infor Governance, Risk, and...
Average Rating
0.0
Number of Reviews
0
Ranking in other categories
Continuous Controls Monitoring (8th), GRC (77th)
One Identity Safeguard
Average Rating
8.2
Reviews Sentiment
6.7
Number of Reviews
54
Ranking in other categories
User Entity Behavior Analytics (UEBA) (5th), Privileged Access Management (PAM) (2nd), Non-Human Identity Management (NHIM) (1st)
 

Mindshare comparison

Infor Governance, Risk, and Compliance and One Identity Safeguard aren’t in the same category and serve different purposes. Infor Governance, Risk, and Compliance is designed for GRC and holds a mindshare of 0.5%, up 0.3% compared to last year.
One Identity Safeguard, on the other hand, focuses on Privileged Access Management (PAM), holds 4.4% mindshare, up 4.2% since last year.
GRC Mindshare Distribution
ProductMindshare (%)
Infor Governance, Risk, and Compliance0.5%
RSA Archer5.6%
AuditBoard3.9%
Other90.0%
GRC
Privileged Access Management (PAM) Mindshare Distribution
ProductMindshare (%)
One Identity Safeguard4.4%
CyberArk Privileged Access Manager11.4%
Delinea Secret Server4.9%
Other79.3%
Privileged Access Management (PAM)
 

Featured Reviews

Use Infor Governance, Risk, and Compliance?
Leave a review
Aryan Priyanish D. - PeerSpot reviewer
Developer Intern at Stealth
Privileged access has been secured while real-time monitoring simplifies credential control
In my opinion, the strongest features of One Identity Safeguard are session monitoring, real-time session control, and the privileged password vault. The password vault has been a game changer because it provides a secure and controlled way to store, manage, and rotate sensitive credentials without exposing them to users. Session monitoring allows us to track and record privileged user activity in real time, which improves visibility and accountability. Overall, One Identity Safeguard has had a positive impact on our organization by strengthening security through centralized privileged access control and improving efficiency through automation. Real-time session monitoring has further enhanced oversight and reduced risk.
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which GRC solutions are best for your needs.
883,619 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
No data available
University
11%
Computer Software Company
9%
Financial Services Firm
7%
Comms Service Provider
7%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
No data available
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business33
Midsize Enterprise21
Large Enterprise19
 

Questions from the Community

Ask a question
Earn 20 points
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for One Identity Safeguard?
One Identity Safeguard is positioned as an enterprise-grade solution, so the license is not the cheapest in the market, but it reflects the value and security capabilities provided. Initial deploym...
What needs improvement with One Identity Safeguard?
The user interface and navigation can be improved. Some workflows, particularly the reporting, session review, and policy configuration could be more intuitive. New users often need time to get com...
What is your primary use case for One Identity Safeguard?
My main use case for One Identity Safeguard is to specifically secure, control, and monitor the privileged accounts across our critical systems. We use this to secure password vaulting for privileg...
 

Also Known As

Infor Approva, Approva
No data available
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Parkland Health, Denver Public Schools, LL Bean, SEB Group, Hansa Hydrocarbons, World Vision
Cavium
Find out what your peers are saying about RSA, OneTrust, Diligent and others in GRC. Updated: February 2026.
883,619 professionals have used our research since 2012.