Infor M3 vs Microsoft Dynamics GP comparison

Infor and Microsoft are both solutions in the ERP category. Infor is ranked #11 with an average rating of 9.0, while Microsoft is ranked #17 with an average rating of 8.7. Infor holds a 2.3% mindshare in ERP, compared to Microsoft’s 1.4% mindshare. Additionally, 92% of Infor users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 88% of Microsoft users who would recommend it.

Infor M3

Read 15 Infor M3 reviews

4,045 Views
3,883 Comparison Views

92% willing to recommend

Microsoft Dynamics GP

Read 25 Microsoft Dynamics GP reviews

2,245 Views
2,178 Comparison Views

88% willing to recommend

Infor M3

Microsoft Dynamics GP

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Nov 3, 2024

Microsoft Dynamics GP and Infor M3 compete in the business management software market. Microsoft Dynamics GP has the advantage in integration with the Microsoft ecosystem, while Infor M3 offers industry-specific functionalities ideal for larger enterprises.

Features: Microsoft Dynamics GP provides robust financial management tools, compatibility with Microsoft services, and strong integration capabilities with third-party solutions. Infor M3 offers powerful supply chain management, detailed manufacturing processes, and comprehensive integration tools tailored for specific industries.

Room for Improvement: Microsoft Dynamics GP could benefit from enhanced reporting capabilities, more industry-specific modules, and greater customization options. Infor M3 may improve by simplifying deployment, enhancing user interface options, and providing faster updates and patches.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Microsoft Dynamics GP offers seamless integration with Microsoft tools, making deployment faster for those in the Microsoft environment. Infor M3 requires more intensive deployment due to its complex features, supported by strong customer service for larger-scale implementations.

Pricing and ROI: Microsoft Dynamics GP typically has a lower initial setup cost and quicker ROI for those already using Microsoft technologies, due to reduced integration expenses. Infor M3 involves higher upfront costs but offers significant long-term returns for enterprises needing tailored solutions.

To learn more, read our detailed Infor M3 vs. Microsoft Dynamics GP Report (Updated: June 2026).

Buyer's Guide

Infor M3 vs. Microsoft Dynamics GP

June 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 902,988 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Infor M3

Ranking in ERP

11th

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

6.3

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Activity Based Costing Software (8th)

Microsoft Dynamics GP

Ranking in ERP

17th

Average Rating

7.8

Reviews Sentiment

6.4

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of July 2026, in the ERP category, the mindshare of Infor M3 is 2.3%, down from 4.9% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Microsoft Dynamics GP is 1.4%, up from 0.9% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

ERP Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
Infor M3	2.3%
Microsoft Dynamics GP	1.4%
Other	96.3%

ERP

Featured Reviews

Umesh D

Vice President, Delivery at Independent Computer Consulting Group, Incorporated

Maximized industry-specific process efficiency with rapid implementation

The best features of Infor M3 are the micro-vertical and industry ready-made solutions rather than generic solutions. They have ready-made solutions ready, so the implementation of the process discovery happens very fast. It won't take more than two months, and if the process is very simple and they adopt the standard, it may happen within five weeks, covering the implementation cycle which will finish within seven to eight months. Most of the time, it helps streamline business processes; maybe some processes such as unique subcontracting vary by continent or job work, which could be different due to legal compliance. Other than that, everything helps because the processes are very much streamlined. Everywhere you have a check and maker concept, there is a workflow, and all those things are there; document management is also very simple. You can drag and drop the reports. The workflow feature is very good and flexible, working with multi-level authorization and all those capabilities. Apart from that, the GUI interface screens are really good. Users can design their own workspace based on the roles, and there are roles-based security options, with many roles available that you need not define—you can just tweak them.

Read full review

reviewer2723988

Executive Director, Digital & Technology at a tech consulting company with 5,001-10,000 employees

Integration and flexibility deliver outstanding business experiences with innovative platforms enhancements

Scale is a primary concern. If the product vision continues to serve small and mid-cap companies, they need to continue incorporating features into the out-of-the-box solution because small-caps typically lack budget for in-house IT organizations to customize and maintain systems. If they want to expand beyond mid-cap and enter the large-cap market, they need to consider balance and provide more customizability. This includes extending process flows through more APIs and building a more modular architecture with granular backend exposed via API. The process layer should allow clients to customize while invoking back-office APIs. The general perception positions Microsoft Dynamics GP in the middle of the market. Systems such as NetSuite and ServiceNow occupy the lower category, providing narrow use cases. Microsoft Dynamics GP offers more breadth and out-of-the-box capabilities at a slightly higher price point. At the top end, SAP, Oracle, and Salesforce offer extensive customizability at a premium price, suitable for large organizations with multiple transactions and customers. Microsoft Dynamics GP currently occupies a favorable position in the middle segment with limited competition.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The solution provides all modules, supply chain, HR - it's good for management."

"The most valuable feature of the solution is that it is highly customizable."

"It's simple to use. You don't need any complex training to use it."

"The most valuable feature is the ability to cover different types of activities, and the requirement for maintenance and data is very low."

"It's very stable, and it handles all types of industrial and manufacturing businesses in very good ways. I've found it to be easy."

"M3 has several useful features for managing supply chains, production, and customer orders. It's an excellent system that helps me meet all my requirements for fixed costs."

"Infor M3 has ready-made processes, which provide the best workflows."

"The most valuable feature of this solution is the Infor GL tool that allows us to do our application support and development."

More Infor M3 pros

"We have not encountered any noteworthy scalability issues; it’s a matter of increasing the power of the servers and hardware/software that it runs on."

"Microsoft Dynamics GP has supported our compliance with industry regulations completely."

"The solution offers integrations with other software as well. We have integration with Microsoft Office where we can do Word and Excel, etc."

"For a bigger environment, this is the best product to go with for an in-house support team."

"We have gained the capability to control and address various issues within the financial module effectively."

"It's enhanced by a subscription billing add-on, to efficiently automate billing and invoicing, particularly due to our substantial customer database."

"It is quite a robust system."

"Numerous third-party add-on products are available to purchase for specific business needs."

More Microsoft Dynamics GP pros

Cons

"Customer support from Infor is responsive and addresses issues, but the response time can be delayed, which sometimes leads me to explore private vendors."

"Here in Infor M3, you have certain limitations where the main components cannot be modified—you must work around or use bolt-ons."

"Sometimes, M3 alone cannot handle all the planning functionalities required by a customer. It has to be used along with industry-specific planning tools because M3 doesn't have all the features. However, no product can handle all the requirements of all the industries. There will be some shortcomings in all the products. Though this is an area for improvement, it is not a very serious shortfall or limitation. It can be covered by using third-party planning applications that integrate with Infor M3."

"The product's technical support has certain shortcomings. Sometimes, my company doesn't get a proper response from their end."

"The configuration appears to have been designed around theory rather than practice."

"The implementation could be simplified, it's complex."

"The solution must provide more learning documents."

"I would like to have some kind of dashboard to show an overview of different data on the same dashboard or on the same screen instead of moving to BI."

More Infor M3 cons

"Scale is a primary concern. If the product vision continues to serve small and mid-cap companies, they need to continue incorporating features into the out-of-the-box solution because small-caps typically lack budget for in-house IT organizations to customize and maintain systems."

"With payroll, the payroll that they have offers US or Canadian tax. However, here, our tax payments are different from the US and Canada. It is very difficult to put in our tax tables. We need some customization. It should be readily available for any country to use according to their tax implications. The system should know different types of tax regimes around the world so that it can accommodate. It's a little bit rigid on that."

"With the exception of the great deal of work we put into customizing the system for our inventory needs, the only suggestion for improvement would be to simplify even further the administration and customization side of things."

"As technology changes, I would say probably in the area of chart up account needs improvement because chart up account is a string. So if they make it more flexible."

"At times, navigating the user console can be challenging, particularly when trying to find account information."

"There should also be extra redundancy when posting to modules."

"Budget commitment and an easy way to import transactions into bank management. Reconcile to GL tool should also incorporate bank management transactions."

"The following modules need improvement: Inventory Payroll Fixed Assets Analytical Accounting (AA)"

More Microsoft Dynamics GP cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The tool’s licensing is yearly."

"If you compare Infor M3 to SAP, Infor M3 is less expensive than SAP, but if you compare Infor M3 to Dynamics 365, Infor M3 is more expensive. It also depends on the model that you buy. It depends on whether you have the complete package or whether you have separate models."

"The cost is between $50 and $100 per user annually."

"Infor M3 is a tier-two product and is cheaper than tier-one products such as SAP and Oracle. However, it is more expensive than some other tier-two products. The licensing cost is dependent on the number of users. Also, if you purchase other tools from Infor as a package, then there may be other discounts offered."

"I'm not part of the team that manages Infor M3 pricing, but it depends on the client, integration, ship-out, and training levels. You get the price from the solution provider, but it would be best to discuss it because nothing is set in stone regarding pricing."

"There is a yearly licensing cost. The price is based on the modules you need. There are several modules, such as HR module, accounting module, sales module, scheduling module, etc., and the price will vary depending on the number of modules you choose. The customers always say that it's very expensive. It can cost a lot of money if your organization is huge. It's not implemented in a lot of organizations in my country because it's too expensive."

"I would say that the pricing is moderate, not cheap, and not expensive. There are many more expensive ERPs than GP, and there are less expensive as well, so it is moderately priced."

"We evaluated some local products, because of the pricing, but this product has better features and support."

"I think the tool is competitively priced and it's more of a one-time investment with a low annual renewal fee."

"The solution's price is steep."

"In comparison to other ERP systems, the pricing is not necessarily inexpensive, but it can be considered more cost-effective."

"For us, in our local currency, it costs us around 5 million Botswanan Pulas a year. It's quite a lot of money."

"Its pricing and licensing are high. Of course, we all know that it is Microsoft."

"It is an affordable solution."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which ERP solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

902,988 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Manufacturing Company

14%

Computer Software Company

Comms Service Provider

Financial Services Firm

Construction Company

22%

Manufacturing Company

Financial Services Firm

Retailer

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	6
Midsize Enterprise	5
Large Enterprise	3

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	11
Midsize Enterprise	5
Large Enterprise	10

Questions from the Community

What needs improvement with Infor M3?

Some customers expect more out-of-box reports, and in some areas, they should provide more reports. However, Infor has introduced a report tool so that key users or global champions can generate re...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Infor M3?

Infor M3 is specifically dominant in fashion, food and beverages, and chemicals manufacturing; it works into micro-verticals. In food and beverage, it specializes in meat processing, confectionery,...

See all answers

What advice do you have for others considering Infor M3?

In Microsoft, it is easier to work due to its .NET technology and hybrid architecture, but Infor M3 is more structured, requiring in-depth knowledge of its rules and table names. I think they shoul...

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Microsoft Dynamics GP?

D365 BC licensing SAAS model with subscription ranging $70/User/Month.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Microsoft Dynamics GP?

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Microsoft Dynamics GP?

I have implemented Microsoft Dynamics GP in commercial and public sector organizations. In commercial pharma life sciences, Salesforce Veeva implementation supports commercial organizations doing p...

See all answers

Comparisons

SAP ERP vs Infor M3

Compared 17% of the time

Infor LN vs Infor M3

Compared 13% of the time

Infor CloudSuite vs Infor M3

Compared 12% of the time

Infor Distribution SX.e vs Infor M3

Compared 7% of the time

SAP S/4HANA vs Infor M3

Compared 6% of the time

More Infor M3 Competitors

Microsoft Dynamics AX vs Microsoft Dynamics GP

Compared 16% of the time

SAP S/4HANA vs Microsoft Dynamics GP

Compared 15% of the time

Sage MAS vs Microsoft Dynamics GP

Compared 7% of the time

SAP ERP vs Microsoft Dynamics GP

Compared 7% of the time

JD Edwards EnterpriseOne vs Microsoft Dynamics GP

Compared 6% of the time

More Microsoft Dynamics GP Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Infor M3

June 2026

Download Infor M3 product report

Buyer's Guide

Microsoft Dynamics GP

June 2026

Download Microsoft Dynamics GP product report

Also Known As

Infor Lawson M3, Lawson M3

Dynamics GP, MS Dynamics GP

Overview

Infor M3 is a comprehensive ERP solution designed for ease of use and customization, supporting industries like manufacturing, food and beverages, and chemicals with robust functionalities in finance, supply chain, and manufacturing processes.

Infor M3 offers extensive capabilities in managing core business operations for finance, manufacturing, and supply chain management. It features ease of integration with third-party applications, an intuitive interface, and fast implementation using ready-made solutions. Its flexibility makes it suitable for industry-specific requirements, providing detailed insights into manufacturing with reliable data extraction and efficient bug fixes. Used widely in multinational manufacturing setups and distribution sectors across Europe and India, Infor M3 manages processes from invoicing to purchasing, ensuring streamlined business operations.

What are the key features of Infor M3?

Ease of Use: Simplifies operations with an intuitive design.
High Customization: Adjusts to specific business needs.
Integration: Compatible with third-party applications.
Finance Management: Comprehensive GL tool for accounting.
Supply Chain: Efficiently manages procurement and logistics.
Manufacturing Insights: Provides detailed process analytics.

What benefits should users look for when evaluating Infor M3?

Streamlined Implementation: Rapid deployment minimizes downtime.
Improved Business Intelligence: Data-driven decision support.
User-Friendly Design: Enhances operational efficiency.
Industry-Specific Adaptability: Suits diverse sectors.
Reliable Performance: Consistent bug fixes enhance functionality.

Infor M3 is particularly beneficial within manufacturing, food and beverage, and chemical industries for planning, procurement, and warehousing needs. Integrated with third-party tools, it is favored by multinational enterprises for tasks ranging from invoicing to purchasing, across regions such as Europe and India. Users often seek better integration, industry-standard features, and improved procurement and supply chain capabilities, alongside a demand for enhanced security measures and easier online documentation.

Infor

Microsoft Dynamics GP is a comprehensive business management solution providing financial control, accounting features, and extensive reporting. It is built to support small to midsize companies offering reliable stability and simplicity in setup.

Microsoft Dynamics GP integrates with Microsoft Office and supports a range of business operations including financials, sales, and inventory management. Despite its strong functionality in financial reporting and analytics, it faces challenges with its outdated interface and limited cloud capabilities. Companies can enhance the system's functionality through Power Apps and Power Platform alongside third-party add-ons. While it is known for its financial stability and user-friendly navigation, improving integration and scalability remains a priority.

What are some key features?

Financial Control: Strong capabilities in accounting and compliance support.
Extensive Reporting: Provides customizable reporting and analytics options.
Integration: Seamlessly connects with Microsoft Office and other systems.
Core Modules: Includes financials, sales, inventory management, and analytics.
Customization: Offers customizable solutions with third-party add-ons.

What benefits do businesses expect?

Reliable Stability: Offers easy setup and dependable performance.
User Navigation: Known for user-friendly interfaces.
Supportive Community: Access a strong network for guidance and collaboration.
Data Accuracy: Enhance data management with Smart Place features.

Many companies use Microsoft Dynamics GP as their primary accounting and financial management platform, supporting accounts payable, receivable, payroll, and inventory management. The integration capabilities allow it to serve as an ERP for small to midsize entities, facilitating additional functionalities in logistics, HR, warehouse operations, and more.

Microsoft

Sample Customers

Grosfillex, High Five Sportswear, L_derach, OTK Group, PHS Group, Propper International, Red Wing Shoe Company, Reynolds Catering Supplies, Saudi Diesel, Sheetz, Zeppelin, Zodiac Aerospace

Rural Metro, WASH Multifamily Laundry, Kauffman Center for the Performing Arts, Elcome International LLC, Batteries Plus Corporate Stores, Catalogic Software, Choate Rosemary Hall

Buyer's Guide

Infor M3 vs. Microsoft Dynamics GP

June 2026

Free Report: Infor M3 vs. Microsoft Dynamics GP

Find out what your peers are saying about Infor M3 vs. Microsoft Dynamics GP and other solutions. Updated: June 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

902,988 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Infor M3 vs. Microsoft Dynamics GP report.

See our list of best ERP vendors.

We monitor all ERP reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.