Infor M3 vs JD Edwards EnterpriseOne comparison

Infor and Oracle are both solutions in the ERP category. Infor is ranked #11 with an average rating of 8.5, while Oracle is ranked #10 with an average rating of 8.4. Infor holds a 5.2% mindshare in ERP, compared to Oracle’s 3.0% mindshare. Additionally, 92% of Infor users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 91% of Oracle users who would recommend it.

Infor M3

Read 15 Infor M3 reviews

3,246 Views
3,149 Comparison Views

92% willing to recommend

JD Edwards EnterpriseOne

Read 62 JD Edwards EnterpriseOne reviews

2,821 Views
2,172 Comparison Views

91% willing to recommend

Infor M3

JD Edwards EnterpriseOne

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Jun 29, 2025

JD Edwards EnterpriseOne and Infor M3 are competing in the ERP software category. JD Edwards EnterpriseOne has a slight advantage in integration and customization capabilities, while Infor M3 excels in industry-specific solutions and integration with third-party applications.

Features: JD Edwards EnterpriseOne offers comprehensive modules with full integration, a robust supply chain model, and customization capabilities through E1 tools. Infor M3 provides strong management for supply chains, production, and customer orders, emphasizing micro-vertical solutions and rapid deployment features.

Room for Improvement: JD Edwards EnterpriseOne could enhance specialized industry features, simplify its interface, and improve reporting tools. Infor M3 could improve out-of-box reports, streamline integration with planning tools, and address customization complexities.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: JD Edwards EnterpriseOne supports on-premises and hybrid cloud deployment but has a complex setup process. Its technical support is responsive, though concerns exist about Oracle's on-premise focus. Infor M3 offers public cloud options with reliable technical support, focusing on efficient ticket resolution.

Pricing and ROI: JD Edwards EnterpriseOne is expensive, especially for extensive licenses, but offers good ROI through stability. Infor M3's pricing is high but seen as more affordable compared to tier-one solutions, delivering good ROI with effective integration.

To learn more, read our detailed Infor M3 vs. JD Edwards EnterpriseOne Report (Updated: July 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Infor M3 vs. JD Edwards EnterpriseOne

July 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 865,985 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Infor M3

Ranking in ERP

11th

Ranking in Activity Based Costing Software

8th

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

6.3

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

JD Edwards EnterpriseOne

Ranking in ERP

10th

Ranking in Activity Based Costing Software

5th

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

6.6

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Production Planning (3rd), Demand Management (2nd)

Mindshare comparison

As of August 2025, in the ERP category, the mindshare of Infor M3 is 5.2%, up from 3.9% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of JD Edwards EnterpriseOne is 3.0%, down from 3.6% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

ERP Market Share Distribution
Product	Market Share (%)
JD Edwards EnterpriseOne	3.0%
Infor M3	5.2%
Other	91.8%

ERP

Featured Reviews

Pravinkumar Bhandare

Principal Consultant - Infor M3 at Merino Consulting Services

The solution is a reliable, stable, and cost-saving ERP

Different countries have different finance practices, but I believe they need to fine-tune their practices to match industry standards. Practices vary from country to country, for example, in India, it is different than in the US. Sometimes, clients require alternate processes that are not standard, but they claim that these are the standard practices in their industry. At those times, we feel that the option required is not available with the solution. This is not the case only for Infor M3. Other ERPs also have the same problem. We can't mold the ERP to fit the customer's requirements. There are some standards in place because many screens and programs are integrated into the finance process. We can't make modifications to fit the client's requirements. The customer needs specific screens for different users, so if that program is in place, we have one planning tool in Infor M3. Planners need to know all things related to manufacturing, purchase, and sales in order to make decisions about planning. In one of my clients, I came across the requirement that they were asking for user authority in the planning tool. This is not the case though, because all planners need to know all things. However, on the manufacturing side, we can say that the person who is working with machine operations only needs to know machine-related information and doesn't need knowledge of products or sales. That standard industry is available, so we can give access to the user as per their needs. If the maintenance people are there, we can give them limited access, but if the planner is there, we need to give them all access according to industry standards. However, this requirement from the client side is not possible with the standard Infor software, but Infor can consider implementing it if the need is larger for many customers.

Read full review

Eric Oboh

Director at Vertex Business Systems

Enables efficient finance and maintenance management with real-time data and strong integration

The integration between plant maintenance, stores, and financials is highly valued by my customers in the refinery business, as it allows for efficient maintenance processes and easily accessible financial information. Additionally, the mobile features are beneficial as they allow managers to approve or reject orders on the go. JD Edwards EnterpriseOne provides real-time data, which is very timely for decision-making. Managers have dashboards created for them that are readily updated for insightful information. This reflects the improved business intelligence features of the solution.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"It's very stable, and it handles all types of industrial and manufacturing businesses in very good ways. I've found it to be easy."

"Its ease of use is most valuable. Inquiries are transparent, and it shows good information on each screen. We don't have to go to 14 different screens to find out about one item, which is a big advantage."

"The product's initial setup phase is easy."

"provides all modules, supply chain, HR - it's good for management."

"Infor M3 has ready-made processes, which provide the best workflows."

"Overall, I rate Infor M3 nine out of ten for a positive experience."

"The user interface and user experience were good."

"It's simple to use. You don't need any complex training to use it."

More Infor M3 pros

"The financial management features are convenient and helpful in JD Edwards EnterpriseOne."

"It has simplified the process completely, and even though it has many features which are available in the market now, but it is on par with the other ERPs that are available in the market now."

"JD Edwards EnterpriseOne is very scalable. It is suitable for any business size, from retail to manufacturing, and can grow with any business."

"With the new versions, it has become very user-friendly. We have integration with mobiles, and we have cloud-based solutions. There are a lot of things that can be done by front-end users without technical knowledge. They can create reports without having to do any coding, and it's very good now."

"JD Edwards EnterpriseOne is perfect for our reporting for the management, workflow, and procurement workflow."

"The financials are great."

"We do a straight forward, simple plug and play installation so there are no problems technically now."

"JD Edwards EnterpriseOne is a user-friendly ERP solution that is quite simple."

More JD Edwards EnterpriseOne pros

Cons

"We can't make modifications to fit the client's requirements."

"Improvements could be made in security and scalability."

"I would like to have some kind of dashboard to show an overview of different data on the same dashboard or on the same screen instead of moving to BI."

"Sometimes, M3 alone cannot handle all the planning functionalities required by a customer. It has to be used along with industry-specific planning tools because M3 doesn't have all the features. However, no product can handle all the requirements of all the industries. There will be some shortcomings in all the products. Though this is an area for improvement, it is not a very serious shortfall or limitation. It can be covered by using third-party planning applications that integrate with Infor M3."

"Here in Infor M3, you have certain limitations where the main components cannot be modified—you must work around or use bolt-ons."

"Customer support from Infor is responsive and addresses issues, but the response time can be delayed, which sometimes leads me to explore private vendors."

"The solution's technical support is an area with shortcomings that need improvement, especially the support for the product named M3 rather than the support offered by Infor as an organization."

"The solution must provide more learning documents."

More Infor M3 cons

"The only issue I see is Oracle's lack of focus on the product. When the sales team calls us, they try to promote OCI more than JD Edwards EnterpriseOne. They don't even talk about it. I feel there's no focus from Oracle Corporation themselves. The salespeople either don't know about it or don't talk about it. When they have something new, they only talk about EBS or OCI. This gives a feeling that there's no interest from Oracle. We don't see much new functionality being released or announced in the roadmap."

"The way of creating daily reports could be made a little bit easier."

"I would like to see the HR features enhanced with respect to localization for South Africa and other countries."

"They have been improving it every day, but it could have more automation."

"Implementing JD Edwards EnterpriseOne can have its challenges. For example, we faced issues like timeout exceptions in a recent integration project while pulling data from third-party systems."

"The initial setup of JD Edwards EnterpriseOne is straightforward. However, it could improve."

"The solution could be easier to implement. However, the complexity was in our internal processes meeting our country's requirements. Every country has a slightly different process, taxation, and rules. That was the difficult part, not the solution itself. I expect our experience would have been more or less the same with any ERP, such as SAP, Navision, or Dynamics."

"There is room for improvement on the payroll side, as the solution is not very strong in this area."

More JD Edwards EnterpriseOne cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"There is a yearly licensing cost. The price is based on the modules you need. There are several modules, such as HR module, accounting module, sales module, scheduling module, etc., and the price will vary depending on the number of modules you choose. The customers always say that it's very expensive. It can cost a lot of money if your organization is huge. It's not implemented in a lot of organizations in my country because it's too expensive."

"The tool’s licensing is yearly."

"If you compare Infor M3 to SAP, Infor M3 is less expensive than SAP, but if you compare Infor M3 to Dynamics 365, Infor M3 is more expensive. It also depends on the model that you buy. It depends on whether you have the complete package or whether you have separate models."

"I'm not part of the team that manages Infor M3 pricing, but it depends on the client, integration, ship-out, and training levels. You get the price from the solution provider, but it would be best to discuss it because nothing is set in stone regarding pricing."

"Infor M3 is a tier-two product and is cheaper than tier-one products such as SAP and Oracle. However, it is more expensive than some other tier-two products. The licensing cost is dependent on the number of users. Also, if you purchase other tools from Infor as a package, then there may be other discounts offered."

"The cost is between $50 and $100 per user annually."

"The licensing is for mid-market businesses, where it is cheaper than Oracle Cloud, EBS, or SAP."

"The price of the solution is not cheap. However, it is priced average amongst competitors."

"The licensing costs are on a yearly basis, and there are no additional costs."

"It's very competitively priced. The only problem now is that most of the industry is moving towards software as a service or a subscription model, whereas JD Edwards has a capital expenditure. You would spend on the licenses once off. You can either host it on-premise or in the cloud, but there is a licensing fee once a year."

"The price of JD Edwards EnterpriseOne is high. However, every ERP solution has a high price."

"More transparent pricing of the software is needed."

"It depends on the number of users and the modules that you want to buy. It is licensed on a perpetual license basis. You buy the license costs upfront, and then there is maintenance for support that you pay every year, which is typically about 20%."

"The solution is really expensive."

More JD Edwards EnterpriseOne pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which ERP solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

865,985 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Computer Software Company

13%

Manufacturing Company

12%

Comms Service Provider

Wholesaler/Distributor

Manufacturing Company

14%

Computer Software Company

10%

Financial Services Firm

Retailer

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	6
Midsize Enterprise	5
Large Enterprise	3

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	22
Midsize Enterprise	12
Large Enterprise	31

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Infor M3?

The product's initial setup phase is easy.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Infor M3?

Some customers expect more out-of-box reports, and in some areas, they should provide more reports. However, Infor has introduced a report tool so that key users or global champions can generate re...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Infor M3?

Infor M3 is specifically dominant in fashion, food and beverages, and chemicals manufacturing; it works into micro-verticals. In food and beverage, it specializes in meat processing, confectionery,...

See all answers

What do you like most about JD Edwards EnterpriseOne?

The tool is valuable for its rich set of functionalities and stability. The solution is stable. The customer service and support is good.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for JD Edwards EnterpriseOne?

JD Edwards EnterpriseOne is perceived as expensive compared to newer applications, and consultancy costs are on the high side.

See all answers

What advice do you have for others considering JD Edwards EnterpriseOne?

I perform complex setups and use flex accounting in different ways. We have both simple projects with basic configurations and complex projects. It depends on the projects. We understand the busine...

See all answers

Comparisons

SAP ERP vs Infor M3

Compared 49% of the time

Infor LN vs Infor M3

Compared 16% of the time

Infor CloudSuite vs Infor M3

Compared 8% of the time

Microsoft Dynamics 365 Business Central vs Infor M3

Compared 5% of the time

Oracle E-Business Suite vs Infor M3

Compared 2% of the time

More Infor M3 Competitors

SAP ERP vs JD Edwards EnterpriseOne

Compared 15% of the time

Oracle E-Business Suite vs JD Edwards EnterpriseOne

Compared 12% of the time

PeopleSoft vs JD Edwards EnterpriseOne

Compared 9% of the time

NetSuite ERP vs JD Edwards EnterpriseOne

Compared 8% of the time

Microsoft Dynamics SL vs JD Edwards EnterpriseOne

Compared 3% of the time

More JD Edwards EnterpriseOne Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Infor M3

August 2025

Download Infor M3 product report

Buyer's Guide

JD Edwards EnterpriseOne

August 2025

Download JD Edwards EnterpriseOne product report

Also Known As

Infor Lawson M3, Lawson M3

No data available

Overview

Infor M3 offers ultimate flexibility in operations, technology, and scale. As a multi-site, multi-country, and multi-company solution, M3 empowers your organization to adapt to changing business needs. It provides flexibility in managing mixed-mode and complex environments, with the agility to make quick adjustments at any time. Written in Java, M3 also gives you platform independence and choice.

Infor

JD Edwards EnterpriseOne is an enterprise resource planning (ERP) software solution developed by Oracle. It is designed to help organizations streamline and automate their business processes, including financial management, supply chain management, and manufacturing operations. JD Edwards EnterpriseOne is a highly customizable solution that can be tailored to meet the specific needs of a wide range of industries, including manufacturing, distribution, and services.

With JD Edwards EnterpriseOne, organizations can manage their financials, inventory, order management, procurement, and supply chain processes from a single, integrated platform. It also provides real-time visibility into business performance, enabling organizations to make informed decisions and respond quickly to changing market conditions.

JD Edwards EnterpriseOne Features

JD Edwards EnterpriseOne has many valuable key features. Some of the most useful ones include:

Financial management: The solution provides tools for financial management, including general ledger, accounts payable, accounts receivable, and fixed assets.

Supply chain management: Its tools for managing the supply chain include procurement, inventory management, and order management.

Manufacturing operations: JD Edwards EnterpriseOne supports manufacturing operations, including material requirements planning (MRP), capacity planning, and shop floor control.

Real-time visibility: With its real-time visibility into business performance, organizations can make more informed decisions.

Business intelligence: The solution offers business intelligence and reporting capabilities to help organizations gain insight into their operations and make data-driven decisions.

Workflow management: The solution’s workflow management enables organizations to automate and streamline business processes.

Mobile access: JD Edwards EnterpriseOne allows users to access information and perform tasks from anywhere, at any time via mobile access.

Security: It provides a secure platform for protecting sensitive data and ensuring the integrity of business operations.

JD Edwards EnterpriseOne Benefits

There are many benefits to implementing JD Edwards EnterpriseOne. Some of the biggest advantages the solution offers include:

Increased productivity: With its range of tools and features, the solution supports collaboration and communication, improving productivity and reducing the time required to complete tasks.

Improved business performance: JD Edwards EnterpriseOne helps organizations improve their overall business performance by providing real-time visibility into key performance metrics and enabling data-driven decision-making.

Customization: JD Edwards EnterpriseOne offers a highly customizable solution that can be tailored to meet the specific needs of a wide range of industries and organizations.

Integration: It integrates with other enterprise applications, including customer relationship management (CRM), human resources (HR), and e-commerce solutions.

Reviews from Real Users

JD Edwards EnterpriseOne is a solution that stands out when compared to many of its competitors. Some of its major advantages are its ability to model, ease of use, customization capabilities, and being able to create reports without coding.

According to PeerSpot user Raymond R., JD Edwards functional consultant manufacturer at Ordina, “The strongest functionality of JD Edwards is the ability to model, in the production that it is, model the production process. If I were to model the bill of materials and production routing, then that's one of the strongest parts of JD Edwards.”

Khalid J., Senior Manager - Group ICT at Gulf Aluminium Rolling Mill Co. B. S. C., says, "We find the ease of use, customization, and user interface valuable."

In addition, a Project Leader at a tech services company expresses, "With the new versions, it has become very user-friendly. We have integration with mobiles, and we have cloud-based solutions. There are a lot of things that can be done by front-end users without technical knowledge. They can create reports without having to do any coding, and it's very good now."

Oracle

Sample Customers

Grosfillex, High Five Sportswear, L_derach, OTK Group, PHS Group, Propper International, Red Wing Shoe Company, Reynolds Catering Supplies, Saudi Diesel, Sheetz, Zeppelin, Zodiac Aerospace

TechNova Imaging Systems (P) Ltd, Jordan Petroleum Refinery, Hosun Universal Co. Ltd., Grupo Corporativo Papelera SA de CV, Label Technology Inc., Uniwax S.A., Al Jaber Group, SOMAR Corporation, SICIM S.p.A.,

Buyer's Guide

Infor M3 vs. JD Edwards EnterpriseOne

July 2025

Free Report: Infor M3 vs. JD Edwards EnterpriseOne

Find out what your peers are saying about Infor M3 vs. JD Edwards EnterpriseOne and other solutions. Updated: July 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

865,985 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Infor M3 vs. JD Edwards EnterpriseOne report.

See our list of best ERP vendors and best Activity Based Costing Software vendors.

We monitor all ERP reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.