Infor M3 vs JD Edwards EnterpriseOne comparison

Infor and Oracle are both solutions in the ERP category. Infor is ranked #13 with an average rating of 8.3, while Oracle is ranked #10 with an average rating of 8.2. Infor holds a 5.2% mindshare in ERP, compared to Oracle’s 3.0% mindshare. Additionally, 92% of Infor users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 90% of Oracle users who would recommend it.

Infor M3

Read 14 Infor M3 reviews

3,597 Views
2,664 Comparison Views

92% willing to recommend

JD Edwards EnterpriseOne

Read 61 JD Edwards EnterpriseOne reviews

2,563 Views
2,107 Comparison Views

90% willing to recommend

Infor M3

JD Edwards EnterpriseOne

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Nov 3, 2024

JD Edwards EnterpriseOne and Infor M3 both compete in the ERP category, focusing on various enterprise solutions. JD Edwards EnterpriseOne holds an advantage in terms of comprehensive features and customization capabilities, while Infor M3 is noted for its industry-specific applications.

Features: JD Edwards EnterpriseOne offers comprehensive warehouse and inventory management, integration with mobile apps, and cloud-based options. It supports diverse business processes with a user-friendly interface. Infor M3 is recognized for its core functionalities in finance, manufacturing, and procurement, though it requires additional third-party tools for specialized needs. Both platforms offer robust options, but JD Edwards stands out for eliminating the need for middleware and extensive customization capabilities.

Room for Improvement: JD Edwards EnterpriseOne needs to enhance industry-specific modules and simplify setup and reporting processes. Error handling and user training are also areas needing attention. Infor M3 struggles with integration and requires improved training resources, client support, and more user-centric dashboards. The complex procurement and supply chain modules could benefit from simplification and better eCommerce support.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: JD Edwards EnterpriseOne supports mainly on-premises deployment with hybrid cloud options, and its technical support receives mixed reviews. Infor M3 offers both on-premises and public cloud deployment, with generally positive technical support feedback. Oracle focuses heavily on cloud solutions for JD Edwards, and both products would improve with more streamlined deployment processes.

Pricing and ROI: JD Edwards EnterpriseOne is a high-cost option for medium to large enterprises, with a complex but competitive licensing compared to SAP. Infor M3 targets similar organizations but is priced more affordably than SAP and costlier than Dynamics 365. Both provide good ROI, with noted financial benefits and stability, though initial investments can be substantial.

To learn more, read our detailed Infor M3 vs. JD Edwards EnterpriseOne Report (Updated: April 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Infor M3 vs. JD Edwards EnterpriseOne

April 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 852,780 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Infor M3

Ranking in ERP

13th

Ranking in Activity Based Costing Software

8th

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

6.4

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

JD Edwards EnterpriseOne

Ranking in ERP

10th

Ranking in Activity Based Costing Software

5th

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

7.5

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Production Planning (3rd), Demand Management (2nd)

Mindshare comparison

As of May 2025, in the ERP category, the mindshare of Infor M3 is 5.2%, up from 4.0% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of JD Edwards EnterpriseOne is 3.0%, down from 3.8% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

ERP

Featured Reviews

Pravinkumar Bhandare

Principal Consultant - Infor M3 at Merino Consulting Services

The solution is a reliable, stable, and cost-saving ERP

Different countries have different finance practices, but I believe they need to fine-tune their practices to match industry standards. Practices vary from country to country, for example, in India, it is different than in the US. Sometimes, clients require alternate processes that are not standard, but they claim that these are the standard practices in their industry. At those times, we feel that the option required is not available with the solution. This is not the case only for Infor M3. Other ERPs also have the same problem. We can't mold the ERP to fit the customer's requirements. There are some standards in place because many screens and programs are integrated into the finance process. We can't make modifications to fit the client's requirements. The customer needs specific screens for different users, so if that program is in place, we have one planning tool in Infor M3. Planners need to know all things related to manufacturing, purchase, and sales in order to make decisions about planning. In one of my clients, I came across the requirement that they were asking for user authority in the planning tool. This is not the case though, because all planners need to know all things. However, on the manufacturing side, we can say that the person who is working with machine operations only needs to know machine-related information and doesn't need knowledge of products or sales. That standard industry is available, so we can give access to the user as per their needs. If the maintenance people are there, we can give them limited access, but if the planner is there, we need to give them all access according to industry standards. However, this requirement from the client side is not possible with the standard Infor software, but Infor can consider implementing it if the need is larger for many customers.

Read full review

Eric Oboh

Director at Vertex Business Systems

Enables efficient finance and maintenance management with real-time data and strong integration

The integration between plant maintenance, stores, and financials is highly valued by my customers in the refinery business, as it allows for efficient maintenance processes and easily accessible financial information. Additionally, the mobile features are beneficial as they allow managers to approve or reject orders on the go. JD Edwards EnterpriseOne ( /products/jd-edwards-enterpriseone-reviews ) provides real-time data, which is very timely for decision-making. Managers have dashboards created for them that are readily updated for insightful information. This reflects the improved business intelligence features of the solution.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"Infor M3 has several valuable features, including customer order management and integration capabilities with third-party applications like ION."

"The most valuable feature of Infor M3 is the level of detail it has about the different manufacturing processes compared to other ERP solutions. Other ERP solutions provide the same level of integration as Infor M3, but Infor M3 specializes in several functions, such as planning and manufacturing."

"The product's initial setup phase is easy."

"Overall, I rate Infor M3 nine out of ten for a positive experience."

"The most valuable feature is the ability to cover different types of activities, and the requirement for maintenance and data is very low."

"It's very stable, and it handles all types of industrial and manufacturing businesses in very good ways. I've found it to be easy."

"The most valuable feature of the solution is that it is highly customizable."

"Infor comes up with different tools every year, and they are all compatible with Infor M3, which makes it a more reliable and trustworthy tool. The integration is very smooth."

More Infor M3 pros

"The most valuable features of JD Edwards EnterpriseOne are the flexibility of the configuration, it is highly configurable. It is not rigid as other solutions, such as SAP. They have recently added a custom workflow approach and approval workflows."

"The navigation interface is user-friendly and easy to understand for any user. Many new employees who have joined our organization from different companies, having worked with SAP and Oracle E-Business Suite, have given positive feedback about JD Edwards EnterpriseOne. They particularly appreciate the types of reports, MIS capabilities, and how quickly and easily they can extract data. According to senior management from other organizations, these features are faster, easier, and more convenient than SAP."

"The solution is very easy to set up."

"The financial management features are convenient and helpful in JD Edwards EnterpriseOne."

"JD Edwards EnterpriseOne has improved within all the solutions and there have been a lot of investments by Oracle in these solutions. Most of the functionalities, and business requirements, are available for the system in the solution and there have been enhancements to the processes, UI, and tools, which have been done on a regular basis."

"JD Edwards is highly scalable and suitable for both small teams and large enterprises with hundreds of users."

"The most valuable feature of JD Edwards EnterpriseOne is the flashback it quickly takes you to the data browser. Additionally, one of the newer tools is the orchestrator which is very good."

"It is highly configurable. You have a choice in terms of how you want to run it. You can run it in your own data center, in a private cloud, or in a public cloud. The choice is really up to the customer."

More JD Edwards EnterpriseOne pros

Cons

"The solution must provide more learning documents."

"We can't make modifications to fit the client's requirements."

"Its initial setup was probably complex, but it is a very good system."

"It should be improved in terms of procurement of the supply chain and business intelligence analysis. We have the Infor BI tool, but it's more complex to use than, for example, Power Pivot or QlikView in the market."

"The implementation could be simplified, it's complex."

"The product's technical support has certain shortcomings. Sometimes, my company doesn't get a proper response from their end."

"Improvements could be made in security and scalability."

"The solution is stable but not agile."

More Infor M3 cons

"Implementing JD Edwards EnterpriseOne can have its challenges. For example, we faced issues like timeout exceptions in a recent integration project while pulling data from third-party systems."

"The initial setup of JD Edwards EnterpriseOne is straightforward. However, it could improve."

"Lacking in certain areas of support."

"Financial side could be expanded by bringing in things like the IMS."

"The only issue I see is Oracle's lack of focus on the product. When the sales team calls us, they try to promote OCI more than JD Edwards EnterpriseOne. They don't even talk about it. I feel there's no focus from Oracle Corporation themselves. The salespeople either don't know about it or don't talk about it. When they have something new, they only talk about EBS or OCI. This gives a feeling that there's no interest from Oracle. We don't see much new functionality being released or announced in the roadmap."

"The reporting has to be flexible or it will turn the end-user off."

"The only issue with the solution that it yet to consider improvements in its price."

"Something that could be included is a supply chain management system. That's what we're looking for."

More JD Edwards EnterpriseOne cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The cost is between $50 and $100 per user annually."

"I'm not part of the team that manages Infor M3 pricing, but it depends on the client, integration, ship-out, and training levels. You get the price from the solution provider, but it would be best to discuss it because nothing is set in stone regarding pricing."

"The tool’s licensing is yearly."

"There is a yearly licensing cost. The price is based on the modules you need. There are several modules, such as HR module, accounting module, sales module, scheduling module, etc., and the price will vary depending on the number of modules you choose. The customers always say that it's very expensive. It can cost a lot of money if your organization is huge. It's not implemented in a lot of organizations in my country because it's too expensive."

"Infor M3 is a tier-two product and is cheaper than tier-one products such as SAP and Oracle. However, it is more expensive than some other tier-two products. The licensing cost is dependent on the number of users. Also, if you purchase other tools from Infor as a package, then there may be other discounts offered."

"If you compare Infor M3 to SAP, Infor M3 is less expensive than SAP, but if you compare Infor M3 to Dynamics 365, Infor M3 is more expensive. It also depends on the model that you buy. It depends on whether you have the complete package or whether you have separate models."

"The licensing costs are on a yearly basis, and there are no additional costs."

"The licensing is for mid-market businesses, where it is cheaper than Oracle Cloud, EBS, or SAP."

"The pricing is an "arm-and-a-leg". This keeps the customers away from going for J.D. Edwards."

"EnterpriseOne is cost-effective for large enterprises."

"In terms of pricing, we have a lot of problems because companies here don't have enough resources to acquire the product. So we need to evaluate the price according to our demographic...The license cost is around 1,00,000 euros."

"The cost depends on the number of users and the modules required."

"The maintenance of JD Edwards EnterpriseOne is expensive and overall the solution is expensive. Most enterprise operation solution is expensive."

"The price of the solution is not cheap. However, it is priced average amongst competitors."

More JD Edwards EnterpriseOne pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which ERP solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

852,780 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Computer Software Company

14%

Manufacturing Company

12%

Retailer

Wholesaler/Distributor

Manufacturing Company

15%

Computer Software Company

13%

Financial Services Firm

Healthcare Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Infor M3?

The product's initial setup phase is easy.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Infor M3?

Improvements could be made in security and scalability. Enhanced changes could be beneficial in security, and while the application is already cloud-based, adding features like daily MRP updates wo...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Infor M3?

I use Infor M3 as a robust system primarily in chemical process engineering, such as chemical industries and textile manufacturing. It is designed for discrete and non-discrete manufacturing, parti...

See all answers

What do you like most about JD Edwards EnterpriseOne?

The tool is valuable for its rich set of functionalities and stability. The solution is stable. The customer service and support is good.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for JD Edwards EnterpriseOne?

JD Edwards EnterpriseOne is perceived as expensive compared to newer applications, and consultancy costs are on the high side.

See all answers

What advice do you have for others considering JD Edwards EnterpriseOne?

I recommend JD Edwards EnterpriseOne due to its stability and functionality, but it may be cost-prohibitive for clients who are budget-conscious. I rate JD Edwards EnterpriseOne an eight out of ten.

See all answers

Comparisons

SAP ERP vs Infor M3

Compared 53% of the time

Infor LN vs Infor M3

Compared 17% of the time

Infor CloudSuite vs Infor M3

Compared 7% of the time

Microsoft Dynamics 365 Business Central vs Infor M3

Compared 4% of the time

Epicor ERP vs Infor M3

Compared 2% of the time

More Infor M3 Competitors

SAP ERP vs JD Edwards EnterpriseOne

Compared 14% of the time

PeopleSoft vs JD Edwards EnterpriseOne

Compared 9% of the time

Oracle Fusion Cloud ERP vs JD Edwards EnterpriseOne

Compared 9% of the time

JD Edwards World vs JD Edwards EnterpriseOne

Compared 9% of the time

More JD Edwards EnterpriseOne Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Infor M3

May 2025

Download Infor M3 product report

Buyer's Guide

JD Edwards EnterpriseOne

May 2025

Download JD Edwards EnterpriseOne product report

Also Known As

Infor Lawson M3, Lawson M3

No data available

Overview

Infor M3 offers ultimate flexibility in operations, technology, and scale. As a multi-site, multi-country, and multi-company solution, M3 empowers your organization to adapt to changing business needs. It provides flexibility in managing mixed-mode and complex environments, with the agility to make quick adjustments at any time. Written in Java, M3 also gives you platform independence and choice.

Infor

JD Edwards EnterpriseOne is an enterprise resource planning (ERP) software solution developed by Oracle. It is designed to help organizations streamline and automate their business processes, including financial management, supply chain management, and manufacturing operations. JD Edwards EnterpriseOne is a highly customizable solution that can be tailored to meet the specific needs of a wide range of industries, including manufacturing, distribution, and services.

With JD Edwards EnterpriseOne, organizations can manage their financials, inventory, order management, procurement, and supply chain processes from a single, integrated platform. It also provides real-time visibility into business performance, enabling organizations to make informed decisions and respond quickly to changing market conditions.

JD Edwards EnterpriseOne Features

JD Edwards EnterpriseOne has many valuable key features. Some of the most useful ones include:

Financial management: The solution provides tools for financial management, including general ledger, accounts payable, accounts receivable, and fixed assets.

Supply chain management: Its tools for managing the supply chain include procurement, inventory management, and order management.

Manufacturing operations: JD Edwards EnterpriseOne supports manufacturing operations, including material requirements planning (MRP), capacity planning, and shop floor control.

Real-time visibility: With its real-time visibility into business performance, organizations can make more informed decisions.

Business intelligence: The solution offers business intelligence and reporting capabilities to help organizations gain insight into their operations and make data-driven decisions.

Workflow management: The solution’s workflow management enables organizations to automate and streamline business processes.

Mobile access: JD Edwards EnterpriseOne allows users to access information and perform tasks from anywhere, at any time via mobile access.

Security: It provides a secure platform for protecting sensitive data and ensuring the integrity of business operations.

JD Edwards EnterpriseOne Benefits

There are many benefits to implementing JD Edwards EnterpriseOne. Some of the biggest advantages the solution offers include:

Increased productivity: With its range of tools and features, the solution supports collaboration and communication, improving productivity and reducing the time required to complete tasks.

Improved business performance: JD Edwards EnterpriseOne helps organizations improve their overall business performance by providing real-time visibility into key performance metrics and enabling data-driven decision-making.

Customization: JD Edwards EnterpriseOne offers a highly customizable solution that can be tailored to meet the specific needs of a wide range of industries and organizations.

Integration: It integrates with other enterprise applications, including customer relationship management (CRM), human resources (HR), and e-commerce solutions.

Reviews from Real Users

JD Edwards EnterpriseOne is a solution that stands out when compared to many of its competitors. Some of its major advantages are its ability to model, ease of use, customization capabilities, and being able to create reports without coding.

According to PeerSpot user Raymond R., JD Edwards functional consultant manufacturer at Ordina, “The strongest functionality of JD Edwards is the ability to model, in the production that it is, model the production process. If I were to model the bill of materials and production routing, then that's one of the strongest parts of JD Edwards.”

Khalid J., Senior Manager - Group ICT at Gulf Aluminium Rolling Mill Co. B. S. C., says, "We find the ease of use, customization, and user interface valuable."

In addition, a Project Leader at a tech services company expresses, "With the new versions, it has become very user-friendly. We have integration with mobiles, and we have cloud-based solutions. There are a lot of things that can be done by front-end users without technical knowledge. They can create reports without having to do any coding, and it's very good now."

Oracle

Sample Customers

Grosfillex, High Five Sportswear, L_derach, OTK Group, PHS Group, Propper International, Red Wing Shoe Company, Reynolds Catering Supplies, Saudi Diesel, Sheetz, Zeppelin, Zodiac Aerospace

TechNova Imaging Systems (P) Ltd, Jordan Petroleum Refinery, Hosun Universal Co. Ltd., Grupo Corporativo Papelera SA de CV, Label Technology Inc., Uniwax S.A., Al Jaber Group, SOMAR Corporation, SICIM S.p.A.,

Buyer's Guide

Infor M3 vs. JD Edwards EnterpriseOne

April 2025

Free Report: Infor M3 vs. JD Edwards EnterpriseOne

Find out what your peers are saying about Infor M3 vs. JD Edwards EnterpriseOne and other solutions. Updated: April 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

852,780 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Infor M3 vs. JD Edwards EnterpriseOne report.

See our list of best ERP vendors and best Activity Based Costing Software vendors.

We monitor all ERP reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.