No more typing reviews! Try our Samantha, our new voice AI agent.

Infor dEPM vs SAS Strategic Performance Management comparison

Why PeerSpot?
 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive Summary

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

Infor dEPM
Ranking in Business Performance Management
12th
Average Rating
7.8
Reviews Sentiment
6.4
Number of Reviews
14
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
SAS Strategic Performance M...
Ranking in Business Performance Management
27th
Average Rating
7.0
Reviews Sentiment
5.9
Number of Reviews
1
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
 

Mindshare comparison

As of October 2026, in the Business Performance Management category, the mindshare of Infor dEPM is 3.7%, up from 1.5% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of SAS Strategic Performance Management is 1.3%, up from 0.8% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Business Performance Management Mindshare Distribution
ProductMindshare (%)
Infor dEPM3.7%
SAS Strategic Performance Management1.3%
Other95.0%
Business Performance Management
 

Featured Reviews

Dietmar Müller - PeerSpot reviewer
Key Account Manager at Cronon GmbH
Customizable features streamline installation and integration challenges remain
Our company is a partner of Infor in Germany. We mainly use Infor DEPM for finance solutions Infor DEPM has features that are well-prepared by Infor. I do not need to have my own tools; I only need to customize many elements. This makes it easier to install and work with. With the prepared…
it_user225768 - PeerSpot reviewer
Analyst/Programmer/Cellular TL at a tech services company with 51-200 employees
The dashboards provide a good amount of information, but the unique keys in the underlying MySQL database caused some issues.
The dashboards/reports provide excellent and concise information/results. Also, it provides a good amount of information via the dashboard The data load and the configuration of the front end was not very easy. One of the main issues was that the SAS macros used by SAS SPM, as well as the…

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"All our customers have experienced a return on investment, as they have been included on the list of calls."
"You can get the data directly from the database with Excel formulas."
"The Excel integration is great."
"The robustness of the Infocubes, and the possibility of integrating both strong data analysis characteristics with pleasant aesthetic features."
"If you are using only spreadsheets and have to download your data from various sources then you will have to reconcile these to build reports that make sense, this product will improve your life."
"It was useful for consolidating data from subsidiaries and having global reports."
"Infor dEPM's got the best end-user reporting solution that keeps us motivated and moving forward with this solution only."
"Integration with other software applications is so user friendly and also it's a single ledger designed system."
"The dashboards/reports provide excellent and concise information/results."
 

Cons

"We'd like to see improvement in the reporting feature. The usability could be better."
"A web-based version would provide greater usability and I believe is still in the development pipeline."
"From my perspective, I think Infor dEPM is a good solution for clients who want to deep dive into data analysis in finance, but it may be complicated."
"The bigger the database with accelerators the more unstable it is, but without accelerators the model would not run."
"The latest version has been cloud-enabled, but it requires a deeper understanding of programming skills compared to the previous versions, which were more user-friendly."
"Flexibility to modify an existing Infocube, and better integration with other ETL tools on the market."
"The mobile offering and dashboards need work, however this has been improved upon in more recent versions of Infor BI."
"It's a very expensive solution."
"The data load and the configuration of the front end was not very easy."
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

"While the licensing cost of Infor dEPM may be costly, it is still more affordable than SAP BusinessObjects EPM, for example."
"The pricing is competitive."
"It's a very expensive product, and I would rate it at nine out of ten, with ten being the most expensive. There are yearly licensing costs."
Information not available
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Business Performance Management solutions are best for your needs.
919,894 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Outsourcing Company
20%
Comms Service Provider
12%
Financial Services Firm
8%
Manufacturing Company
7%
No data available
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business8
Midsize Enterprise5
Large Enterprise1
No data available
 

Questions from the Community

What needs improvement with Infor dEPM?
From my perspective, I think Infor dEPM is a good solution for clients who want to deep dive into data analysis in finance, but it may be complicated. The user cannot make decisions independently a...
What is your primary use case for Infor dEPM?
With Infor dEPM, I usually recommend it for finance, insurance companies, oil and gas companies, and hospitality industries. I have one client in education who currently wants to deploy Infor dEPM ...
Ask a question
Earn 20 points
 

Also Known As

Infor Dynamic Enterprise Performance Management, Infor PM
Strategic Performance Management
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

DAB Group
Bank of Queensland, Barclays Bank, BioMar, Danske Bank, Danske Spil, DPPS, First Allied
Find out what your peers are saying about Anaplan, SAP, Oracle and others in Business Performance Management. Updated: October 2026.
919,894 professionals have used our research since 2012.