Infoblox NetMRI [EOL] vs NetBrain comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Infoblox Logo
views| comparisons
100% willing to recommend
NetBrain Logo
1,423 views|909 comparisons
75% willing to recommend
Comparison Buyer's Guide
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Infoblox NetMRI [EOL] and NetBrain based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about Cisco, Red Hat, SolarWinds and others in Network Automation.
To learn more, read our detailed Network Automation Report (Updated: March 2024).
768,246 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Anonymous User
Deborah Gamelin
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pros
"Scalable solution for tracking and syncing through the Infoblox grid."

More Infoblox NetMRI [EOL] Pros →

"Enables maps to be drawn out.""NetBrain is a very simple tool.""Chain management is a good feature. I don't get it on other solutions.""This product has good network monitoring and troubleshooting capabilities.""A reliable, time-saving tool for providing accurate layer 2 and layer 3 network mappings."

More NetBrain Pros →

Cons
"Lacks network overview for the entire connected network."

More Infoblox NetMRI [EOL] Cons →

"The solution could integrate more automation.""It would be nice if the setup was a little simpler. Also, if the solution could provide more training materials for new people coming into our company so they can quickly learn how to use the functionalities.""Each device needs to be configured to allow NetBrain to poll for the information it needs, which can be very time-consuming for a large network.""The IP interface brief isn't consistent.""Support needs to improve for the installed product and some of the reporting could be more flexible to provide more complete cataloging."

More NetBrain Cons →

Pricing and Cost Advice
Information Not Available
  • "The product is expensive, but less expensive than some of the competition and worth the price."
  • "Licensing is based on a per-device basis, which means that it can get very expensive if you have a large number of devices."
  • More NetBrain Pricing and Cost Advice →

    report
    Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Network Automation solutions are best for your needs.
    768,246 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Questions from the Community
    Ask a question

    Earn 20 points

    Top Answer:NetBrain is a very simple tool.
    Top Answer:The solution is licensing and on-premises. You need to download the software and enable the license on any X86 machine server. We pay a yearly subscription fee. It's economical. It was not very… more »
    Top Answer:NetBrain is a very simple tool, however, it's not an NDR. It doesn't have the capabilities to run PCAPs and so on. The solution could integrate more automation. If the product has to be evolved, it… more »
    Ranking
    Unranked
    In Network Automation
    5th
    out of 22 in Network Automation
    Views
    1,423
    Comparisons
    909
    Reviews
    0
    Average Words per Review
    0
    Rating
    N/A
    Comparisons
    Also Known As
    NetMRI
    Learn More
    Overview

    Infoblox NetMRI enables you to smartly manage your multi-vendor network with automation, visibility and continuous insight. Today’s network infrastructures are more complex than ever–increasingly diverse, siloed and powered by multiple vendors. IT admins often struggle to meet escalating demands for service delivery and reliability in these environments. Infoblox NetMRI can help. Our network change and configuration management solution automates routine workflows such as device provisioning and security operations. By simplifying and streamlining network management, NetMRI enables tighter compliance, faster incident response and quicker app deployment.

    Managing today’s networks with yesterday’s manual processes is no longer a viable solution. NetBrain’s network automation platform provides actionable insights into your network to help you make better and faster decisions - particularly when you’re troubleshooting, securing, and making changes to the network.

    Sample Customers
    BlueCross BlueShield
    CompuCon, TD Ameritrade, Move Inc.
    Top Industries
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Government14%
    Financial Services Firm9%
    Computer Software Company8%
    Manufacturing Company7%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Computer Software Company13%
    Financial Services Firm10%
    Government10%
    Manufacturing Company9%
    Company Size
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business17%
    Midsize Enterprise13%
    Large Enterprise70%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business20%
    Midsize Enterprise11%
    Large Enterprise70%
    Buyer's Guide
    Network Automation
    March 2024
    Find out what your peers are saying about Cisco, Red Hat, SolarWinds and others in Network Automation. Updated: March 2024.
    768,246 professionals have used our research since 2012.

    Infoblox NetMRI [EOL] doesn't meet the minimum requirements to be ranked in Network Automation while NetBrain is ranked 5th in Network Automation with 6 reviews. Infoblox NetMRI [EOL] is rated 8.0, while NetBrain is rated 7.2. The top reviewer of Infoblox NetMRI [EOL] writes "Has the ability to track and sync through the grid". On the other hand, the top reviewer of NetBrain writes "Good monitoring and troubleshoot capabilities, improves overall network traffic visibility". Infoblox NetMRI [EOL] is most compared with , whereas NetBrain is most compared with Cisco DNA Center, ThousandEyes, Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform, SolarWinds Network Automation Manager and Forward Enterprise.

    See our list of best Network Automation vendors.

    We monitor all Network Automation reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.