InfluxDB vs TruView comparison

InfluxData and NETSCOUT are both solutions in the Network Monitoring Software category. InfluxData is ranked #13 with an average rating of 8.3, while NETSCOUT is ranked #64 with an average rating of 5.0. InfluxData holds a 0.5% mindshare in NMS, compared to NETSCOUT’s 0.5% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of InfluxData users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of NETSCOUT users who would recommend it.

InfluxDB

Read 20 InfluxDB reviews

5,305 Views
1,379 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

TruView

Read 17 TruView reviews

1,732 Views
1,645 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

InfluxDB

TruView

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Oct 10, 2024

TruView and InfluxDB compete in the data analytics space. InfluxDB seems to have the upper hand due to its extensive features and scalability, making it a suitable choice for organizations focusing on long-term growth.

Features: TruView provides robust network performance monitoring, easy integration with other platforms, and effective alerting mechanisms. InfluxDB features a high-performance time series database, efficient handling of large data volumes, and advanced data analytics capabilities, making it well-suited for technical environments.

Room for Improvement: TruView could enhance its data visualization tools, increase support for additional data sources, and offer more customizable dashboards. InfluxDB could simplify its deployment process, expand user interface options, and improve entry-level user documentation.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: TruView offers straightforward deployment and accessible customer support, allowing organizations to start quickly. InfluxDB, with a more complex deployment process, provides well-documented guides and a responsive support team, serving those able to manage technical complexities.

Pricing and ROI: TruView typically presents lower initial setup costs, attractive for organizations seeking cost-effective solutions with short-term ROI. In contrast, InfluxDB, while requiring higher upfront investment, delivers long-term ROI through powerful capabilities and scalability, appealing to those prioritizing future growth.

To learn more, read our detailed InfluxDB vs. TruView Report (Updated: April 2026).

Buyer's Guide

InfluxDB vs. TruView

April 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 894,807 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

InfluxDB

Ranking in Network Monitoring Software

13th

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

6.5

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Non-Relational Databases (1st), Open Source Databases (7th), IT Infrastructure Monitoring (14th), NoSQL Databases (6th)

TruView

Ranking in Network Monitoring Software

64th

Average Rating

9.4

Reviews Sentiment

7.2

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of May 2026, in the Network Monitoring Software category, the mindshare of InfluxDB is 0.5%, up from 0.3% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of TruView is 0.5%, up from 0.1% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Network Monitoring Software Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
InfluxDB	0.5%
TruView	0.5%
Other	99.0%

Network Monitoring Software

Featured Reviews

Mugeesh Husain

Team Lead, Software at Energybox

Time series data has been managed efficiently for IoT sensors but reporting still needs improvement

How InfluxDB can be improved is relevant since for Energy Box, we face certain issues. We have customers worldwide, including the United States, United Kingdom, and Europe, but when we expanded to China two years ago, they indicated that they do not support the cloud version there. Our application is built on the cloud, which required us to create a separate application for Azure China, which was painful for us. The second issue involves frequent version changes. For example, we started with version one, transitioned to version two, and I heard they are considering InfluxDB version three, reverting to earlier practices. InfluxDB should improve without completely changing its approach. Now we have to redo our work for InfluxDB version three. Regarding needed improvements, the documentation is sufficient, but pricing presents a challenge. InfluxDB has standard pricing, which is acceptable for large companies. However, for startups in our position, they should provide special discounts so everyone can utilize it. The pricing should adapt as companies grow, which is a reasonable expectation.

Read full review

Zotex

Network Engineer at a comms service provider with 1,001-5,000 employees

Monitors traffic, analyzes flows, tracks packets, and measures bandwidth across our network

We use TruView primarily for network performance analysis and monitoring. It helps us track traffic, flows, packets, and bandwidth to understand our network's condition and detect any anomalies or attacks. However, the product's age limits its advanced features for performance analysis. The main advantage lies in its low cost and reliable functionality, as we have a permanent license and do not require support. Real-time monitoring in TruView is somewhat limited, as there is a delay of about five minutes in data updates, making it less effective for immediate insights.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The most valuable features are aggregating the data and integration with Graphana for monitoring."

"InfluxDB reduced my time to show data without any interruption, also reducing the number of people needed to manage the project; it is very good to have InfluxDB in my project."

"In our case, it started with a necessity to fill the gap that we had in monitoring. We had very reactive monitoring without trend analysis and without some advanced features. We were able to implement them by using a time series database. We are able to have all the data from applications, logs, and systems, and we can use a simple query language to correlate all the data and make things happen, especially with monitoring. We could more proactively monitor our systems and our players' trends."

"The solution is very powerful."

"While I would rate InfluxDB a ten on a scale of one to ten, users should be thoughtful about matching the engine to their specific needs."

"InfluxDB works as expected with excellent scalability and stability, which is critical for our application."

"It helps me maintain my solution easily because it is very reliable, so we didn't face any performance issues or crashes regarding our queries; we can get the results very fast."

"Based on InfluxDB, we have great analytics produced by our SRE team, and with that, we have an alerting and monitoring system in place."

More InfluxDB pros

"Visual TruView helped our network team respond to potential issues before they became larger ones."

"It gives us the ability to determine the root of a problem or a network, whether it's on the network side, the database, application server, or server infrastructure."

"TruView takes only minutes to install."

"The most valuable feature for us was the ability to monitor sites and get a nice overview of all the data in a single view."

"We use TruView primarily for network performance analysis and monitoring. It helps us track traffic, flows, packets, and bandwidth to understand our network's condition and detect any anomalies or attacks. However, the product's age limits its advanced features for performance analysis. The main advantage lies in its low cost and reliable functionality, as we have a permanent license and do not require support. Real-time monitoring in TruView is somewhat limited, as there is a delay of about five minutes in data updates, making it less effective for immediate insights."

Cons

"InfluxDB can be improved in several ways. The Flux query language needs to be learned, but if there were something similar to SQL or previous options, it would be much easier for users without imposing a learning curve."

"The solution doesn't have much of a user interface."

"I haven't seen a return on investment; unfortunately, I cannot share relevant metrics such as time saved, fewer employees needed, or money saved."

"InfluxDB can improve by including new metrics on other technologies. They had some changes recently to pool data from endpoints but the functionality is not good enough in the industry."

"One area for improvement is the querying language. InfluxDB deprecated FluxQL, which was intuitive since developers are already familiar with standard querying."

"The interface of InfluxDB is so complex and should be made easier for non-technical people."

"The error logging capability can be improved because the logs are not very informative."

More InfluxDB cons

"One area that could be improved is the reporting features. In the version transformation from ten to eleven, the platform changed from a Windows-based platform to a Linux-based platform. As a result, the previous reporting feature using Crystal Reports was no longer available. Instead, we had to generate PDF dashboard reports, which were not as flexible."

"I can't give them quite a 10, because from time to time, I'll work with the folks who, not that they're not good, but there are some who are just phenomenal."

"Whilst Citrix could be handled better like their nGenius product line (which does an excellent job) it copes with the centralised type of deployment TruView covers."

"We have faced delays in data retrieval and the lack of support due to the product being out of service."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"We are using the open-source version of InfluxDB."

"InfluxDB is open-source, but there are additional costs for scaling."

"The tool is an open-source product."

"InfluxDB recently increased its price. It is very expensive now."

Information not available

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Network Monitoring Software solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

894,807 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

12%

Comms Service Provider

10%

Manufacturing Company

10%

University

Comms Service Provider

21%

Construction Company

13%

Financial Services Firm

Transportation Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	9
Midsize Enterprise	4
Large Enterprise	8

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	7
Midsize Enterprise	6
Large Enterprise	7

Questions from the Community

What needs improvement with InfluxDB?

InfluxDB can be improved by addressing issues such as performance drops, queries being more difficult to understand, and its high memory usage. InfluxDB is not suitable for relational databases lik...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for InfluxDB?

My main use case for InfluxDB is storing a time series database and analyzing data changes over time. I use InfluxDB to store my infrastructure and application metrics, logs, events, and data, and ...

See all answers

What advice do you have for others considering InfluxDB?

I would advise others looking into using InfluxDB that if they want to store a time series database for monitoring, logging, and event-based tasks, and also want long-term retention of the database...

See all answers

What needs improvement with TruView?

We have faced delays in data retrieval and the lack of support due to the product being out of service.

See all answers

What is your primary use case for TruView?

We use TruView to monitor traffic, analyze flows, track packets, and measure bandwidth across our network. This helps us gain insights into our network's performance, detect any anomalies or attack...

See all answers

What advice do you have for others considering TruView?

Overall, I would rate TruView a nine out of ten. I would recommend it for mid-sized organizations, particularly those with fewer than two thousand people, as it offers flexible licensing without de...

See all answers

Comparisons

SQLite vs InfluxDB

Compared 7% of the time

MongoDB Enterprise Advanced vs InfluxDB

Compared 7% of the time

PostgreSQL vs InfluxDB

Compared 7% of the time

ClickHouse vs InfluxDB

Compared 6% of the time

MySQL vs InfluxDB

Compared 6% of the time

More InfluxDB Competitors

OmniPeek vs TruView

Compared 13% of the time

NetFort LANGuardian vs TruView

Compared 9% of the time

PingPlotter vs TruView

Compared 9% of the time

ClearSight Analyzer vs TruView

Compared 9% of the time

LiveNX vs TruView

Compared 9% of the time

More TruView Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

InfluxDB

May 2026

Download InfluxDB product report

Buyer's Guide

TruView

April 2026

Download TruView product report

Overview

InfluxDB offers efficient time series data handling with fast writes, optimized storage, and seamless Grafana integration, making it ideal for high-volume applications like crypto trading and real-time monitoring. Its SQL-like query language and cloud-based options enhance user experience and system scalability.

InfluxDB stands out with its ability to handle high-volume time series data efficiently, thanks to fast data writes and efficient compression. It is highly scalable, providing clustering features for improved performance management. Integration with Grafana enhances visualization, making it easier to analyze complex data through a user-friendly SQL-like query language. Real-time monitoring, historical data access, and proactive alerts enhance system reliability. Its cloud offering simplifies maintenance and operations, making it attractive for users seeking an efficient time series database.

What are the key features of InfluxDB?

Fast Data Writes: Ensures quick data handling necessary for real-time applications.
Optimized Storage: Reduces space requirements and improves performance.
Efficient Compression: Supports high-volume data like time series, enhancing throughput.
Grafana Integration: Supports seamless visualization and analysis of data.
SQL-like Query Language: Simplifies complex data operations with user-friendly queries.

What benefits or ROI can users expect?

Enhanced Performance: Fast processing and optimized storage for better application responsiveness.
Scalability: Clustering features ensure adaptability to growing data volumes.
Improved Reliability: Proactive alerts and real-time monitoring prevent system downtimes.
Ease of Use: SQL-like language and intuitive visuals improve user accessibility.

InfluxDB is applied extensively in industries handling high-volume data needs. For sensor data storage in production environments, it offers reliable performance. Its role in server management metrics and performance monitoring is crucial for maintaining optimal operations. In crypto market data collection, it supports fast-paced trading environments. Industries use it for real-time tracking, like maritime vessel monitoring, leveraging its rapid data handling and visualization capabilities. Its applications also extend to IoT environments, API performance tracking, HVAC systems, and log aggregation, often integrating with Prometheus, Docker, and AWS to enhance system capabilities.

InfluxData

TruView streamlines data analytics by offering comprehensive features that empower users to efficiently manage and interpret large datasets. It is designed for those who seek precision and depth in their analytics tools.

TruView is a versatile analytics tool tailored for expert users who require detailed insights and powerful data processing capabilities. It is crafted to accommodate extensive data volumes, offering flexible integration options and customizable analytics for precise decision-making. TruView is recognized for its speed and accuracy, supporting users in achieving data-driven insights efficiently.

What are the valuable features of TruView?

Advanced Data Processing: Efficiently handles large datasets without compromising speed.
Customizable Dashboards: Tailors visualizations to meet specific analytical needs.
Seamless Integration: Connects easily with existing data systems for smoother transitions.
Real-time Analytics: Provides up-to-date insights for prompt decision-making.
Comprehensive Reporting: Generates detailed reports for effective data interpretation.

What benefits should users consider in reviews?

Cost Efficiency: Beneficial return on investment through efficient data management.
User Satisfaction: High ratings for reliability and precision from expert users.
Scalability: Adapts to growing data needs without performance loss.
Improved Decision Making: Facilitates timely and informed business decisions.
Time-Saving: Reduces time spent on data analysis with streamlined processes.

TruView's implementation varies across industries such as finance, healthcare, and retail, where it provides tailored solutions to meet sector-specific demands. In finance, it enhances risk assessment and investment strategies. Healthcare facilities leverage it for patient data analytics, while retailers use it to understand consumer behavior and optimize inventory management.

NETSCOUT

Sample Customers

ebay, AXA, Mozilla, DiDi, LeTV, Siminars, Cognito, ProcessOut, Recommend, CATS, Smarsh, Row 44, Clustree, Bleemeo

FloraHolland, Miami-Dade Public Library System, Southeastern Freight Lines, Valdosta State University, Everett Clinic, Bioreference, Key Information Systems, ACER, Odeabank A.S.

Buyer's Guide

InfluxDB vs. TruView

April 2026

Free Report: InfluxDB vs. TruView

Find out what your peers are saying about InfluxDB vs. TruView and other solutions. Updated: April 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

894,807 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our InfluxDB vs. TruView report.

See our list of best Network Monitoring Software vendors.

We monitor all Network Monitoring Software reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.