OpenText Application Quality Management and Inflectra SpiraTest are competitors in the application quality management space. Based on comparisons, Inflectra SpiraTest seems to have the upper hand due to its affordability and user-friendly interface, while OpenText is favored for customizable options for larger organizations.
Features: OpenText offers extensive customization, flexibility between cloud and on-premises, and scalability for larger organizations. Inflectra SpiraTest is distinguished by its strong integration capabilities, user-friendly interface, and affordability, making it ideal for simpler, smaller team requirements.
Room for Improvement: OpenText's enhancements could focus on lowering licensing costs, improving project tracking, and updating its user interface. Inflectra SpiraTest needs to enhance its reporting capabilities, cross-project interoperability, and test case management.
Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: OpenText provides cloud, on-premises, and hybrid solutions, but receives mixed technical support reviews. Inflectra SpiraTest offers public cloud and on-premises deployments, known for being responsive and customer-focused, though efficiency can be improved based on some user feedback.
Pricing and ROI: OpenText, with a comprehensive feature set, is considered premium-priced, suited for large enterprises that's justified by its functionalities. Inflectra SpiraTest is cost-effective, with a simple licensing model offering good ROI for smaller teams without compromising essential test management capabilities.
It acts as an enabler for effective test and program management.
Technical support has been excellent.
Quality is always high yet not perfect.
I am mostly happy with the technical support from OpenText ALM _ Quality Center.
OpenText ALM Quality Center is definitely scalable.
From a stability standpoint, OpenText ALM Quality Center has been pretty good.
Improvements are needed so that the system can continue running without creating a new run.
HPLM has one of the best UIs compared to other test management tools, allowing for efficient navigation between test pieces, test folders, test suites, and test execution.
The user-friendly nature could be enhanced as the interface isn’t intuitive.
It would be cheaper to use a cloud model with a pay-per-use licensing model.
It creates constant visibility into the test process, showing the status, bugs, and automated test results.
The integration with internal applications and CollabNet is made possible through exposed APIs, allowing necessary integrations.
We can create a requirement for stability metrics with the test cases to ensure all requirements are covered.
OpenText Application Quality Management offers extensive capabilities in test management, automation tool integration, and defect traceability, providing an efficient and user-friendly experience for tracking and managing testing workflows.
The platform supports test management by integrating with automation tools and managing the traceability of defects and requirements. It facilitates users with linking test cases to defects, uploading from Excel, and generating customizable reports, which enhances efficiency. Business Process Testing and requirement capturing for test cases further extend its capabilities. Users report concerns about its integration with other tools, particularly in DevOps and agile frameworks, as well as challenges with its complex interface and high cost. Improved integration, better browser compatibility, upgraded dashboards, and enhanced support for agile methodologies are recommended by many users.
What are the most important features of OpenText Application Quality Management?In industries such as finance, healthcare, and technology, organizations apply OpenText Application Quality Management for test management, planning, and automation. It is an essential tool for managing test scenarios, recording results, and supporting both manual and automated testing processes. This tool aids in regression testing, ensuring requirement traceability and acting as a repository for executing test cycles, thereby supporting robust quality assurance practices.
We monitor all Test Management Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
