OpenText Application Quality Management and Inflectra SpiraTest are application management tools competing in test lifecycle management. OpenText is more suitable for large enterprises due to its extensive features and customizable options, while Inflectra SpiraTest offers a cost-effective solution for smaller organizations with good integration capabilities.
Features: OpenText Application Quality Management provides comprehensive traceability, a robust API, and extensive customization and integration with automation tools, making it ideal for large organizations with complex needs. Inflectra SpiraTest is easy to use, integrates well with test management systems like JIRA, and offers a user-friendly experience with robust reporting capabilities.
Room for Improvement: OpenText Application Quality Management could improve on high licensing costs and complexity in deployment and reporting. Inflectra SpiraTest needs more intuitive integration with third-party tools and a streamlined user interface for managing test cases and reports.
Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: OpenText Application Quality Management offers on-premises, private cloud, and hybrid cloud deployment, but customer service experiences vary, with some reporting slow support. Inflectra SpiraTest focuses on public cloud deployment and is recognized for responsive customer service, although occasional delays in support response are noted.
Pricing and ROI: OpenText Application Quality Management is perceived as expensive, suitable for organizations that can fully leverage its capabilities, offering substantial ROI for large deployments. Inflectra SpiraTest is more affordable, offering value at a lower cost, appealing to small to medium-sized organizations. Its lower pricing structure makes it more accessible compared to competitors like IBM or HP.
It acts as an enabler for effective test and program management.
Technical support has been excellent.
Quality is always high yet not perfect.
I am mostly happy with the technical support from OpenText ALM _ Quality Center.
OpenText ALM Quality Center is definitely scalable.
From a stability standpoint, OpenText ALM Quality Center has been pretty good.
Improvements are needed so that the system can continue running without creating a new run.
HPLM has one of the best UIs compared to other test management tools, allowing for efficient navigation between test pieces, test folders, test suites, and test execution.
The user-friendly nature could be enhanced as the interface isn’t intuitive.
It would be cheaper to use a cloud model with a pay-per-use licensing model.
It creates constant visibility into the test process, showing the status, bugs, and automated test results.
The integration with internal applications and CollabNet is made possible through exposed APIs, allowing necessary integrations.
We can create a requirement for stability metrics with the test cases to ensure all requirements are covered.
| Product | Market Share (%) |
|---|---|
| OpenText Application Quality Management | 12.7% |
| Inflectra SpiraTest | 1.2% |
| Other | 86.1% |
| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 6 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 12 |
| Large Enterprise | 7 |
| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 39 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 32 |
| Large Enterprise | 161 |
OpenText Application Quality Management offers centralized data management, traceability, and integration capabilities. It aids in handling requirements, test planning, and defect tracking while supporting both manual and automated testing. Challenges exist in deployment and browser compatibility.
Known for its robust reporting and flexibility, OpenText Application Quality Management is tailored for large organizations requiring a comprehensive solution supporting lifecycle coverage and seamless tool integration. Users can consolidate testing processes, manage requirements, and centralize reporting across manual and automated testing. While some face issues with project tracking, outdated interfaces, and limited browser compatibility beyond Internet Explorer, it remains widely used for regression and performance testing. Integration with tools like JIRA and support for tools such as UFT and ALM PC underscore its utility.
What are the key features of OpenText Application Quality Management?In industries such as finance and healthcare, OpenText Application Quality Management is implemented to ensure rigorous testing standards. It supports test case creation and execution, defect tracking, and requirements management. Integration with JIRA and performance testing tools make it suitable for organizations needing synchronized testing environments.
We monitor all Test Management Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
