Idira Privileged Access Manager vs Tenable OT Security comparison

Why PeerSpot?

Idira by Palo Alto Networks and Tenable are both solutions in the Operational Technology (OT) Security category. Idira by Palo Alto Networks is ranked #4 with an average rating of 8.6, while Tenable is ranked #5 with an average rating of 8.5. Idira by Palo Alto Networks holds a 1.8% mindshare in OT, compared to Tenable’s 7.0% mindshare. Additionally, 95% of Idira by Palo Alto Networks users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of Tenable users who would recommend it.

Idira Privileged Access Man...

Read 231 Idira Privileged Access Manager reviews

30,034 Views
601 Comparison Views

95% willing to recommend

Tenable OT Security

Read 7 Tenable OT Security reviews

2,832 Views
2,832 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Idira Privileged Access Man...

Tenable OT Security

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Nov 8, 2026

Idira Privileged Access Manager and Tenable OT Security are competitors in the privileged access and OT security categories. Idira seems to have the upper hand in providing comprehensive privilege management, while Tenable focuses on specialized OT security.

Features: Idira Privileged Access Manager focuses on centralized control, offering password management, session monitoring, and role-based administrative access. It also provides Privileged Threat Analytics for detecting cyber threats. Tenable OT Security is ideal for vulnerability management, offering asset visibility and threat detection features. It supports comprehensive scanning for vulnerabilities, especially in IT-OT converged environments.

Room for Improvement: Idira users suggest enhancing user interface integration and adding more plugin connectors for device management. Improving session recording search and simplifying installation is also recommended. Tenable OT Security could benefit from adding threat prediction features and faster asset detection. Enhanced IoT support and automation in response actions would further improve user experience.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Idira offers both on-premises and cloud deployments with satisfactory customer support. Tenable supports mainly on-premises and private cloud options but excels with quick, knowledgeable assistance. Idira's flexible deployment options cater to diverse needs, while Tenable's strength lies in domain-specific support.

Pricing and ROI: Idira is more expensive, with complex licensing that may challenge smaller enterprises, though its security features justify the cost for larger organizations. Tenable is more affordable with a narrower OT security focus. Both provide value relative to their pricing, with Idira potentially offering higher ROI for larger infrastructures.

To learn more, read our detailed Idira Privileged Access Manager vs. Tenable OT Security Report (Updated: September 2026).

Buyer's Guide

Idira Privileged Access Manager vs. Tenable OT Security

September 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 921,338 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Idira Privileged Access Man...

Ranking in Operational Technology (OT) Security

4th

Average Rating

8.6

Reviews Sentiment

6.8

Number of Reviews

231

Ranking in other categories

User Activity Monitoring (2nd), Enterprise Password Managers (3rd), Privileged Access Management (PAM) (1st), Mainframe Security (2nd)

Tenable OT Security

Ranking in Operational Technology (OT) Security

5th

Average Rating

8.6

Reviews Sentiment

6.6

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of November 2026, in the Operational Technology (OT) Security category, the mindshare of Idira Privileged Access Manager is 1.8%, up from 0.4% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Tenable OT Security is 7.0%, down from 9.9% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Operational Technology (OT) Security Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
Idira Privileged Access Manager	1.8%
Tenable OT Security	7.0%
Other	91.2%

Operational Technology (OT) Security

Featured Reviews

Mahmudul Hoque Khan

Lead Engineer at intelQong Technology

Centralized access has improved privileged control and visibility yet still needs better integrations

While the access control capabilities are useful, streamlining some configuration and policy management workflows could enhance the user experience for administrators. A simpler interface for creating access policies and quickly identifying unusual activities would make day-to-day administration more efficient. Stronger integration with existing identity data and secret management could be a significant improvement for Idira Privileged Access Manager. Deeper integration with cloud solutions would make it easier to correlate privileged access activity with other security events. I would also appreciate more flexible reporting and dashboards so administrators can swiftly see access patterns and unusual privileged access from a single view.

Read full review

AbhishekPandey5

Senior Consultant at Payatu

Enables cost-effective asset and threat management while requiring improvements in support and training

The time it takes to train itself is a concern. Initially, it will not identify many assets, as it needs time to read the information before finding the assets. Some detections can go wrong, and it may not understand certain industrial protocols. While installation and deployment are easy, upgrading from one version to another can be challenging. When you assure clients they will receive minus two upgrades, sometimes upgrading through the cloud becomes difficult, requiring on-site upgrades. During upgrades, the previous configuration may be lost, creating support issues.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"When we started with RPA, there was a requirement that every credential and the bots themselves be protected through the PAM system. From the get-go, we've had CyberArk in the middle... We've got a pretty robust RPA implementation with our PAM platform. Users, bots, the credentials — everything is managed via our PAM solution."

"CyberArk PAM can be easily automated."

"It's user-friendly and very configurable. We can do many things with it, especially with password management."

"You can write different types of policies for custom business needs or any developer needs. If they need certain functions allocated, they can be customized easily."

"The value is probably the best of all of the other products which are offering the same services."

"The automatic change of the password and Privileged Session Manager (PSM) are the most valuable features. With Privileged Session Manager, you can control the password management in a centralized way. You can activate these features in a session; the session isolation and recording. You apply the full intermediation principle. So, you must pass through CyberArk PAM to get access to the target system. You don't need to know the password, and everything that you do is registered and auditable. In this case, no one gets to touch the password directly. Also, you can implement detection and response behavior in case of a breach."

"The most valuable feature is the ability to manage many accounts and broker connections between devices without needing to know passwords."

"CyberArk Privileged Access Manager is very powerful and customizable."

More Idira Privileged Access Manager pros

"The initial setup was very easy, and I would rate it a ten out of ten."

"The product’s price is its most valuable feature."

"The biggest advantage is that with good infrastructure, you can utilize asset planning when using Nessus along with Tenable OT Security."

"It's for securing the vulnerability of the OT solutions they are using. We mitigate those through patch management activities and find vulnerabilities easily with this security solution."

"The product has easy-to-manage features and components."

"I like Tenable OT Security for two main reasons. Firstly, it helps identify vulnerabilities and risks for IT and OT assets, which is crucial for our operations. Secondly, it performs external port scanning, including vulnerability scans for open ports. Compared to the Claroty Platform, the tool offers detailed asset discovery capabilities."

"The active query inventory is the most valuable feature."

"The clear distinction between IT and OT that Tenable OT provides is its most valuable feature."

Cons

"Performance of PIM could be better and intended for usability as well as security."

"The Vault's disaster recovery features need improvement."

"One of the main things that could be improved would be filtering accounts on the main page and increasing the functionality of the filters. There are some filters on the side which are very specific, but I feel there could be more."

"It should be easy to use for non-technical people. Its interface can be a bit difficult."

"On the UI level, things could be better."

"For users to access a system via CyberArk Privileged Session Manager, a universal connector needs to be coded in a language called AutoIT and its support for web browsers is so-so. Other products like Centrify have browser plugins that can help automate the process when using their products."

"We don't often contact technical support, but when we do it, the response could be faster and better."

"As of now, it does not manage all of the IDM practices. It is only good as a PAM solution."

More Idira Privileged Access Manager cons

"The solution could detect changes in reading variables. The support of IoT devices can be improved."

"Tenable OT product is good, but OT security itself is still maturing."

"Tenable.ot's integration with one of the products needs improvement."

"Tenable OT Security is fine, but I find it more language-based rather than structured. It feels like something is on a web page, and the dashboards and data representations are not cool. First of all, I said that the tool view should be improved. It looks pretty old. Second, the details Tenable OT Security provides regarding the metadata they work with should be more in-depth. Its main focus is vulnerability management, which is fine, but what about threat actors? What about attack vectors and OT vulnerabilities? There are major areas, baselines, etc. that need attention."

"The solution should provide more features to prevent attacks."

"During upgrades, the previous configuration may be lost, creating support issues."

"As an IT security professional, I would like to see automation improvements in the response part of Tenable OT Security. However, I understand that implementing automation in OT environments can be quite challenging."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"CyberArk Enterprise Password Vault's pricing is reasonable."

"Its price is high. I have also worked with Delinea. CyberArk is comparatively expensive compared to other PAM solutions, such as Delinea, especially during renewal."

"I believe that this solution is priced well. It's the market leader and I think that it's the best solution."

"I'm aware that the organization had purchased licensing for almost all of CyberArk's solutions including licensing for PTA, EPM, and the Application Identity Manager. But when it comes to PSM, this is one of the components where there's an additional charge for any extra PSMs that you want to deploy. I believe that there's some rider where the vendor has a bit of leeway to, at times, charge a premium on whatever additional services you may require above the board."

"My company always complains about the cost of CyberArk Privileged Access Manager because it's too high."

"Overall, its pricing is really good. The main difference from all the other vendors is that they have one package that covers all the functionality and modules of the basic PAM, except the add-on modules like adware and server protection. It also doesn't include the licenses for domain controller protection or maybe an API call-related feature. For the basic privileged access management, the bundle pricing is really good, but when it comes to an agent-based solution for advanced cyber protection or application identity managers, it is expensive. Services are also very expensive if you hire the services team from CyberArk, but these guys are really good. For a couple of large banking projects, we had an experience with them. The banks wanted to have things quickly and efficiently, so we had to hire them. If we take four weeks, these guys can do everything on a weekend. They charge quite a big sum of money, but they know the system well."

"Pricing and licensing depend on the environment."

"Although CyberArk Privileged Access Management is expensive, its protection capabilities outweigh the cost."

More Idira Privileged Access Manager pricing and cost advice

"The product is inexpensive."

"The tool's pricing is fair enough."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Operational Technology (OT) Security solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

921,338 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Outsourcing Company

13%

Financial Services Firm

11%

Manufacturing Company

10%

Comms Service Provider

Energy/Utilities Company

16%

Manufacturing Company

14%

Outsourcing Company

Computer Software Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	59
Midsize Enterprise	43
Large Enterprise	175

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	4
Large Enterprise	4

Questions from the Community

How does Sailpoint IdentityIQ compare with CyberArk PAM?

We evaluated Sailpoint IdentityIQ before ultimately choosing CyberArk. Sailpoint Identity Platform is a solution to manage risks in cloud enterprise environments. It automates and streamlines the m...

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for CyberArk Privileged Access Manager?

The pricing is reasonable compared to other software options we evaluated, and it is straightforward. However, overall costs depend on deployment size and licensing requirements.

See all answers

What needs improvement with CyberArk Privileged Access Manager?

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Tenable OT Security?

Considering the cost and that it is affordable, I would rate it at seven.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Tenable OT Security?

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Tenable OT Security?

I am using it for Asset Discovery, vulnerability management and threat intel. Tenable OT Security is for asset management, vulnerability management as continuous threat detection for OT ICS environ...

See all answers

Comparisons

Safeguard by One Identity vs Idira Privileged Access Manager

Compared 3% of the time

Keeper Enterprise Password Manager vs Idira Privileged Access Manager

Compared 3% of the time

NetWitness Platform vs Idira Privileged Access Manager

Compared 3% of the time

Teleport vs Idira Privileged Access Manager

Compared 3% of the time

F5 BIG-IP Access Policy Manager (APM) vs Idira Privileged Access Manager

Compared 2% of the time

More Idira Privileged Access Manager Competitors

Claroty Platform vs Tenable OT Security

Compared 17% of the time

Nozomi Networks vs Tenable OT Security

Compared 16% of the time

Dragos vs Tenable OT Security

Compared 13% of the time

Check Point Industrial Control Systems (ICS) Security vs Tenable OT Security

Compared 8% of the time

TXOne Security Inspection vs Tenable OT Security

Compared 6% of the time

More Tenable OT Security Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Idira Privileged Access Manager

October 2026

Download Idira Privileged Access Manager product report

Buyer's Guide

Operational Technology (OT) Security

October 2026

Download Tenable OT Security product report

Also Known As

CyberArk Privileged Access Security, CyberArk Enterprise Password Vault

Tenable.ot

Overview

CyberArk Privileged Access Manager safeguards privileged accounts through password management, credential rotation, and session recording. With seamless integration and real-time monitoring, it ensures robust security across platforms.

CyberArk Privileged Access Manager is recognized for its extensive capabilities in managing and securing privileged accounts. It offers vital functionalities such as automatic password rotation, real-time session monitoring, and cross-platform integration through APIs and custom connectors. Users find the flexibility in workflows and granular access controls beneficial, particularly in protecting access across cloud and on-prem infrastructures. However, improvements in its interface, installation process, plugin support, and integration with third-party tools are often suggested. Pricing is a concern for many, along with the need for better dashboard reporting, user provisioning, and enhanced documentation. Organizations leverage this tool for encrypting and monitoring critical account activities and automating password management to bolster security.

What are the key features of CyberArk Privileged Access Manager?

Enterprise Password Vault: Provides secure storage and management of enterprise credentials.
Privilege Session Manager: Offers comprehensive session recording and monitoring.
Privileged Threat Analytics: Detects and alerts on potential credential threats.
Integration Capabilities: Easily integrates with multiple systems using APIs and custom connectors.

What benefits or ROI should users expect?

Enhanced Security: Automates and centralizes password management, reducing risk of account misuse.
Compliance Support: Ensures alignment with compliance policies through automated processes.
Operational Efficiency: Streamlines security operations with real-time monitoring and integration.
Adaptability: Protects privileged access across diverse infrastructure setups including cloud and on-prem.

CyberArk Privileged Access Manager finds substantial use in industries such as finance, healthcare, and technology, where the protection of privileged accounts is critical. These sectors rely on its capabilities to manage application credentials securely and provide safe access for developers, administrators, and vendors across various infrastructures.

Idira by Palo Alto Networks

Tenable OT Security combines IT and OT features to enhance asset visibility and detect vulnerabilities and threats. Ideal for mixed network infrastructures, it strengthens network segmentation and protection, particularly in industrial control settings.

Designed for IT and OT environments, Tenable OT Security identifies vulnerabilities, improves asset discovery, and continuously detects threats. Enhanced by bundled Nessus and external port scanning, it supports easy management across convergent environments. Users can explore diverse reporting formats and capitalize on cost-effective solutions compared to peers. While integration with Fortinet and IoT device support needs improvement, users benefit from detailed asset discovery alongside network protection and segmentation. Extensive training and industrial protocol understanding are areas for development, with asset identification and challenging upgrades often reported.

What are the key features?

Vulnerability Identification: Efficiently discovers and categorizes vulnerabilities.
Asset Visibility: Detailed insights into asset discovery across networks.
Threat Detection: Continuous monitoring for potential threats.
External Port Scanning: Enhances security with comprehensive port checks.
Bundled Nessus: Augments capabilities for threat assessment and management.

What benefits should users consider?

Cost-Effectiveness: Competitive pricing compared to other solutions.
Easy Management: Simplified processes for integrating with existing systems.
Diverse Reporting Formats: Flexibility in reporting tailored to business needs.
Comprehensive Threat Protection: Balanced approach to safeguarding IT and OT networks.

Tenable OT Security is widely applied in industries such as manufacturing and critical infrastructure. Its role in network protection and segmentation helps secure environments like HVAC and camera systems. In manufacturing and virtual centers, it identifies attacks and protects OT ICS setups against cyber threats. Serving industries similar to Claroty, users benefit from enhanced asset discovery and vulnerability management in complex network infrastructures.

Tenable

Sample Customers

Rockwell Automation

Nesher Cement Enterprises, City of Raleigh

Buyer's Guide

Idira Privileged Access Manager vs. Tenable OT Security

September 2026

Free Report: Idira Privileged Access Manager vs. Tenable OT Security

Find out what your peers are saying about Idira Privileged Access Manager vs. Tenable OT Security and other solutions. Updated: September 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

921,338 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Idira Privileged Access Manager vs. Tenable OT Security report.

See our list of best Operational Technology (OT) Security vendors.

We monitor all Operational Technology (OT) Security reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.