Idira Privileged Access Manager vs Microsoft Purview Privileged Access Management comparison

Idira by Palo Alto Networks and Microsoft are both solutions in the Privileged Access Management (PAM) category. Idira by Palo Alto Networks is ranked #1 with an average rating of 8.6, while Microsoft is ranked #18 with an average rating of 8.5. Idira by Palo Alto Networks holds a 9.9% mindshare in PAM, compared to Microsoft’s 1.7% mindshare. Additionally, 95% of Idira by Palo Alto Networks users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of Microsoft users who would recommend it.

Idira Privileged Access Man...

Read 230 Idira Privileged Access Manager reviews

22,329 Views
9,378 Comparison Views

95% willing to recommend

Microsoft Purview Privilege...

Read 5 Microsoft Purview Privileged Access Management reviews

1,467 Views
1,452 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Idira Privileged Access Man...

Microsoft Purview Privilege...

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Jun 2, 2026

Idira Privileged Access Manager and Microsoft Purview Privileged Access Management are prominent players in privileged access solutions, focusing on securing user access to sensitive resources. Microsoft Purview appears to have an advantage with its extensive features, appealing to businesses valuing advanced capabilities.

Features: Idira Privileged Access Manager includes potent identity management, tailored access controls, and efficient audit capabilities. Microsoft Purview offers integrated AI analytics, advanced security monitoring, and comprehensive compliance tools. It stands out for its depth in analytics and compliance functionalities, offering a broad range of technical tools.

Room for Improvement: Idira could enhance its feature set to match the expansive capabilities of competitors. Its analytics and compliance features are less comprehensive than those of other platforms. Additionally, Idira may benefit from increasing its offerings in AI integration. Microsoft Purview could improve its cost structure, as the initial investment is high. Simplification of its deployment process might attract smaller enterprises, and expanding support options could further enhance user satisfaction.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Idira provides a streamlined deployment approach with an effective support system, ensuring smooth integration. Microsoft Purview benefits from a scalable cloud-based setup, greatly supported by Microsoft's extensive ecosystem. While Idira offers direct deployment and attentive customer service, Microsoft's network provides robust infrastructure support.

Pricing and ROI: Idira offers a competitive entry cost, appealing for businesses seeking rapid return on investment through effective access management. Microsoft Purview demands a higher initial cost but justifies it with long-term ROI through its advanced features and strategic insights into privileged access management. The main contrast lies in Idira's affordable pricing against Microsoft Purview's comprehensive capabilities, backed by substantial investment.

To learn more, read our detailed Idira Privileged Access Manager vs. Microsoft Purview Privileged Access Management Report (Updated: June 2026).

Buyer's Guide

Idira Privileged Access Manager vs. Microsoft Purview Privileged Access Management

June 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 904,836 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Idira Privileged Access Man...

Ranking in Privileged Access Management (PAM)

1st

Average Rating

8.6

Reviews Sentiment

6.8

Number of Reviews

230

Ranking in other categories

User Activity Monitoring (1st), Enterprise Password Managers (2nd), Mainframe Security (1st), Operational Technology (OT) Security (3rd)

Microsoft Purview Privilege...

Ranking in Privileged Access Management (PAM)

18th

Average Rating

8.6

Reviews Sentiment

5.0

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of July 2026, in the Privileged Access Management (PAM) category, the mindshare of Idira Privileged Access Manager is 9.9%, down from 17.3% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Microsoft Purview Privileged Access Management is 1.7%, down from 2.1% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Privileged Access Management (PAM) Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
Idira Privileged Access Manager	9.9%
Microsoft Purview Privileged Access Management	1.7%
Other	88.4%

Privileged Access Management (PAM)

Featured Reviews

Atul-Gujar

CyberArk manager at a comms service provider with 10,001+ employees

Secures critical infrastructures with essential user session audit records

A potential area for improvement is enhancing support for cluster environments and distributed Vaults. Clients in multiple countries that need central access have different challenges that require better solutions from CyberArk. For financial services, CyberArk can improve incident response by ensuring fast support for critical priority tickets to meet compliance requirements. Providing more documentation on CyberArk is recommended for new team members to enhance their troubleshooting capabilities. I understand it's up to the client, but 99% fail to change the demo key, so it's crucial for CyberArk to emphasize changing the key and documenting it as part of the installation process.

Read full review

reviewer2797275

Systems Engineer at a leisure / travel company with 201-500 employees

Access control has improved approvals and tracking and now supports just-in-time administration

Microsoft Purview Privileged Access Management definitely has a good amount of value for me because I associate it in a way that if someone wants to try to do something, they have to get approval. This means someone doing something has to put in what ticket information is relevant so I can keep track of why they are doing it. They are not just going in there with access to do whatever they want to do. It has to be done with a purpose and I think that is a big key point of it. The Just-in-Time access feature has not really helped me a lot more with managing privileged access. I think it is just a matter of how things are set up. If I need to build a server, I have to go in and increase my privileges for an amount of time that is allowed to build the server and then it elapses and then I am kicked out and then the next time I have to do it all over again. This is nice because it keeps track of what is going on. However, it would be nicer if I got a better reporting tool that can show what was happening instead of an email every single time it happens. The access review capabilities of Microsoft Purview Privileged Access Management definitely benefits me so that I have a better understanding of who has access to what and what they are doing at what time.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"CyberArk Privileged Access Manager has positively impacted my organization, showing significant improvement since all sessions are monitored and isolated using isolated RDP sessions, which are created temporarily and expire if not used."

"You can gradually implement CyberArk, starting with more easily attainable goals."

"We like it for the ability to automatically change passwords. At least for my group, that's the best thing."

"The password management feature is valuable."

"The most valuable feature of the solution is session recording."

"It provides an accountability to the individuals who are using it, knowing that it is audited and tracked."

"It is best suited for mid to large-size enterprises; it is priced well, it is the market leader, and I think that it's the best solution."

"It allows users to self-provision access to the accounts that they need."

More Idira Privileged Access Manager pros

"The integration with other Microsoft solutions is a standout feature of Microsoft Purview Privileged Access Management."

"Microsoft Purview Privileged Access Management definitely has a good amount of value for me because I associate it in a way that if someone wants to try to do something, they have to get approval."

"Microsoft Purview Privileged Access Management is easy to understand, particularly its menu."

"The integration with Azure Identity is a significant advantage, as it allows for seamless automation and power app integration."

"The ability to provide just-in-time privileged access and set specific parameters for access duration is highly beneficial."

Cons

"CyberArk has to continue to evolve with that threat landscape to make sure that they're still protecting those credentials that are owned by those that have privileged accounts in the firms."

"I don't know if "failed authentication" is a glitch or if that was an update... However, since we are the CyberArk support within our organization, we need to know that the password is suspended and we won't know that unless we have the ITA log up. So when a user calls and says, "Hey, I'm locked out of CyberArk, I can't get into CyberArk," we have to go through all of these other troubleshooting steps because the first thing we don't think of right now is, "The account is suspended." It doesn't say that anymore."

"One of the main things that could be improved would be filtering accounts on the main page and increasing the functionality of the filters. There are some filters on the side which are very specific, but I feel there could be more."

"I think they can improve account onboarding. For instance, you have to use the Password Vault utility, whereas in Thycotic I think there is a feature in the user interface that allows you to upload your account with an Excel file. So I'd like to have a similar thing in CyberArk."

"We had an issue with the Copy feature... Apparently, in version 10, that Copy feature does not work. You actually have to click Show and then copy the password from within Show and then paste it. We've had a million tickets and we had to figure out a workaround to it."

"Improvements in CyberArk Privileged Access Manager should focus on simplifying installation and upgrade times, and also consider making professional services training more accessible to implementers and partners."

"I would like to see better usability for non-technical people."

"Integration with the ticketing system should allow any number of fields to be used for validation before allowing a user to be evaluated and able to access a server."

More Idira Privileged Access Manager cons

"Sometimes, its functions, like XLOOKUP in Microsoft Excel, do not find situations properly, especially without the use of pivot tables."

"Microsoft Purview Privileged Access Management could improve integration with multiple cloud environments."

"There's room for improvement in Microsoft's documentation, as it often lacks clarity."

"Microsoft Purview Privileged Access Management has made progress in providing insights into generative AI tools being used within organizations, but customers need to further track where sensitive information is being used within AI tooling."

"The Just-in-Time access feature has not really helped me a lot more with managing privileged access."

"I do not see any financial benefit after implementing Microsoft Purview Privileged Access Management, however, this question would be better answered by my manager."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"CyberArk provides all the features bundled. This is compared to other vendors who provide them as a different license for each functionality."

"It is not a cheap solution. It is expensive as compared with other solutions. However, it is one of the best solutions in their domain."

"The solution is available at a high price"

"Pricing is quite high and it could be improved."

"Our risk is definitely significantly lower. Also, our resources are low."

"CyberArk DNA is free if you purchase the CyberArk solution. There is no additional charge for CyberArk DNA, which is great."

"Payments have to be made on a yearly basis toward the licensing costs of the solution."

"With the current model of licensing, for my use cases, sometimes it's hard to convince the management and get budget approvals for it. It's expensive and you're not getting anything new. It's just a control, but in terms of risk, you are covering a big impact on the company. Improvement in the licensing prices is something I would want to have."

More Idira Privileged Access Manager pricing and cost advice

Information not available

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Privileged Access Management (PAM) solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

904,836 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

13%

Manufacturing Company

10%

Outsourcing Company

Construction Company

Financial Services Firm

14%

Healthcare Company

11%

Manufacturing Company

10%

Comms Service Provider

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	59
Midsize Enterprise	42
Large Enterprise	175

No data available

Questions from the Community

How does Sailpoint IdentityIQ compare with CyberArk PAM?

We evaluated Sailpoint IdentityIQ before ultimately choosing CyberArk. Sailpoint Identity Platform is a solution to manage risks in cloud enterprise environments. It automates and streamlines the m...

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for CyberArk Privileged Access Manager?

My thoughts on the pricing of CyberArk Privileged Access Manager depend entirely on the vendors' requirements. If they want their things to be secure, they have to spend accordingly. We have four t...

See all answers

What needs improvement with CyberArk Privileged Access Manager?

I believe account discovery and rolling support need to be improved. Account discovery is important when integrating with other systems, as other PAM solutions can perform account discovery and onb...

See all answers

What needs improvement with Microsoft Purview Privileged Access Management?

I would say some of the things that could probably be improved is probably the reporting aspects. Being able to get a general and easier setup of reporting to show what was enabled for each day by ...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Microsoft Purview Privileged Access Management?

I utilize Microsoft Purview Privileged Access Management for all of our access inside of Azure and 365, associating different rights to different areas. Whether it is creating, assigning licensing ...

See all answers

What advice do you have for others considering Microsoft Purview Privileged Access Management?

With these two solutions, Microsoft Purview Privileged Access Management and Admin By Request, other than the fact that it is for cloud and for on-premises, there are no other main differences. I w...

See all answers

Comparisons

One Identity Safeguard vs Idira Privileged Access Manager

Compared 4% of the time

Teleport vs Idira Privileged Access Manager

Compared 3% of the time

Keeper Enterprise Password Manager vs Idira Privileged Access Manager

Compared 3% of the time

Saviynt Identity Cloud vs Idira Privileged Access Manager

Compared 3% of the time

Delinea Secret Server vs Idira Privileged Access Manager

Compared 3% of the time

More Idira Privileged Access Manager Competitors

Okta Platform vs Microsoft Purview Privileged Access Management

Compared 21% of the time

Delinea Privileged Access Service vs Microsoft Purview Privileged Access Management

Compared 14% of the time

One Identity Cloud PAM Essentials vs Microsoft Purview Privileged Access Management

Compared 14% of the time

BeyondTrust Endpoint Privilege Management vs Microsoft Purview Privileged Access Management

Compared 8% of the time

ManageEngine PAM360 vs Microsoft Purview Privileged Access Management

Compared 6% of the time

More Microsoft Purview Privileged Access Management Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Idira Privileged Access Manager

July 2026

Download Idira Privileged Access Manager product report

Buyer's Guide

Microsoft Purview Privileged Access Management

June 2026

Microsoft Purview Privileged Access Management report

Download Microsoft Purview Privileged Access Management product report

Also Known As

CyberArk Privileged Access Security, CyberArk Enterprise Password Vault

Microsoft Privileged Access Management (PAM)

Overview

CyberArk Privileged Access Manager safeguards privileged accounts through password management, credential rotation, and session recording. With seamless integration and real-time monitoring, it ensures robust security across platforms.

CyberArk Privileged Access Manager is recognized for its extensive capabilities in managing and securing privileged accounts. It offers vital functionalities such as automatic password rotation, real-time session monitoring, and cross-platform integration through APIs and custom connectors. Users find the flexibility in workflows and granular access controls beneficial, particularly in protecting access across cloud and on-prem infrastructures. However, improvements in its interface, installation process, plugin support, and integration with third-party tools are often suggested. Pricing is a concern for many, along with the need for better dashboard reporting, user provisioning, and enhanced documentation. Organizations leverage this tool for encrypting and monitoring critical account activities and automating password management to bolster security.

What are the key features of CyberArk Privileged Access Manager?

Enterprise Password Vault: Provides secure storage and management of enterprise credentials.
Privilege Session Manager: Offers comprehensive session recording and monitoring.
Privileged Threat Analytics: Detects and alerts on potential credential threats.
Integration Capabilities: Easily integrates with multiple systems using APIs and custom connectors.

What benefits or ROI should users expect?

Enhanced Security: Automates and centralizes password management, reducing risk of account misuse.
Compliance Support: Ensures alignment with compliance policies through automated processes.
Operational Efficiency: Streamlines security operations with real-time monitoring and integration.
Adaptability: Protects privileged access across diverse infrastructure setups including cloud and on-prem.

CyberArk Privileged Access Manager finds substantial use in industries such as finance, healthcare, and technology, where the protection of privileged accounts is critical. These sectors rely on its capabilities to manage application credentials securely and provide safe access for developers, administrators, and vendors across various infrastructures.

Idira by Palo Alto Networks

Microsoft Purview Privileged Access Management offers seamless integration with Microsoft solutions, providing enhanced security with just-in-time access and automated revocation. It supports Azure Identity for automated and conditional access features, streamlining data management across platforms.

Microsoft Purview Privileged Access Management is known for its detailed auditing, customizable reports, and robust security features. While it efficiently manages privileged access and controls roles in platforms like Azure and Office 365, improvement is needed in predefined sensitive information types and large data exports. Users value its capabilities in preventing data leaks and managing access in applications such as Outlook, Word, and Excel. However, challenges remain with AI features and regional relevance of sensitivity types. Documentation could be clearer, and support services improved. Despite these issues, the pricing is transparent, providing a clear view into costs.

What are the key features of Microsoft Purview Privileged Access Management?

Detailed Auditing: Provides thorough logging of access activities.
Just-in-Time Access: Grants temporary elevated access with automatic revocation.
Alerting: Notifies users of changes in access rights.
Integration with Azure Identity: Enables automation and conditional access protocols.
Customizable Reports: Offers tailored analytical reports for better insights.

What benefits or ROI should users expect?

Enhanced Security: Just-in-time access reduces risks of unauthorized use.
Seamless Integration: Works well with existing Microsoft ecosystems.
Efficient Data Management: Supports the management of sensitive formats, like credit card data.
Pricing Transparency: Clear and straightforward cost structure.

Companies across finance, healthcare, and technology sectors implement Microsoft Purview Privileged Access Management to protect sensitive data and maintain control over access roles. Used alongside data protection measures like Data Loss Prevention, it helps organizations reduce the risk of data leaks while complementing other security technologies. Adoption has been broad across industries needing stringent data governance.

Microsoft

Sample Customers

Rockwell Automation

Information Not Available

Buyer's Guide

Idira Privileged Access Manager vs. Microsoft Purview Privileged Access Management

June 2026

Free Report: Idira Privileged Access Manager vs. Microsoft Purview Privileged Access Management

Find out what your peers are saying about Idira Privileged Access Manager vs. Microsoft Purview Privileged Access Management and other solutions. Updated: June 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

904,836 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Idira Privileged Access Manager vs. Microsoft Purview Privileged Access Management report.

See our list of best Privileged Access Management (PAM) vendors.

We monitor all Privileged Access Management (PAM) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.