Identity Manager by One Identity vs Microsoft Entra Permissions Management [EOL] comparison

Why PeerSpot?

The compared One Identity and Microsoft solutions aren't in the same category. One Identity is ranked #1 in IGA , with an average rating of 8.4, and holds a 11.3% mindshare in the category. Additionally, 94% of One Identity users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of Microsoft users who would recommend it.

Identity Manager by One Ide...

Read 194 Identity Manager by One Identity reviews

16,252 Views
5,038 Comparison Views

94% willing to recommend

Microsoft Entra Permissions...

Read 2 Microsoft Entra Permissions Management [EOL] reviews

100% willing to recommend

Identity Manager by One Ide...

Microsoft Entra Permissions...

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Identity Manager by One Identity and Microsoft Entra Permissions Management [EOL] based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about One Identity, SailPoint, Omada and others in Identity Governance Administration (IGA).

To learn more, read our detailed Identity Governance Administration (IGA) Report (Updated: September 2026).

Buyer's Guide

Identity Governance Administration (IGA)

September 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 913,924 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Identity Manager by One Ide...

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

6.7

Number of Reviews

194

Ranking in other categories

User Provisioning Software (1st), Identity Management (IM) (1st), Identity Governance Administration (IGA) (1st)

Microsoft Entra Permissions...

Average Rating

7.0

Reviews Sentiment

7.0

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Featured Reviews

Neha Chhangani

Business Analyst at a startup based organization

Centralized identity governance has automated lifecycle management and simplifies compliance

One Identity Manager could be improved by making the initial setup and configuration simpler, especially for complex workflows and integrations. The user interface and reporting dashboards could also be more modern and intuitive with better out-of-the-box analytics. Additionally, clearer documentation and faster implementation guidance would help organizations get value more quickly. One specific challenge my team encountered was the complexity during initial configuration, especially when setting up custom workflows and role models which required more time and expertise. We also felt that out-of-the-box reports and dashboards are limited, and more customizable real-time analytics would be helpful. Better documentation and guided setup wizards would make adoption easier, particularly for teams new to identity governance tools. One improvement I think One Identity Manager needs is the enhanced self-service experience. The end-user self-service portal could be more intuitive with clearer guidance for access requests and password resets. Additionally, while integrations are solid, deeper cloud-native connectors and API-driven automation would help in hybrid and multi-cloud environments. A more responsive mobile interface or dedicated app for approvals and tasks would help managers who are often on the go. One more improvement is the built-in predictive insights or trend dashboards around access patterns and risk could improve proactive governance. More descriptive error messages and in-tool troubleshooting tips during setup configuration would reduce dependency on external documentation or support.

Read full review

Sameer Bhat

Vice President at Goldman Sachs

Provides resource-based access and security, but time-bound access can be a problem

Entra ID is the core of the identity management that we have. This is the key product that we are using. I am currently also looking into Entra Private Access because we are planning to deploy about 50,000 desktops into Azure and use Azure Virtual Desktop. We would like to give access to the users from the desktop to on-premises applications. I learned that Entra Private Access is a good solution. That is not yet GA, but that is what we are looking for. Entra provides a single pane of glass for managing user access, but because our company also integrates with Nebula API, only administrators use Entra's pane. A normal person who wants to get onboarded can do self-service using Nebula. The features for whitelisting and other things are definitely there. That is what we use specifically. Application IDs, enterprise applications, and all those things are already there, so we have more efficiency. There is also security because we usually do not allow user identities to get direct access to Azure resources. Usually, we use the service principles from Entra ID, so this way, it increases security. Entra has helped to save time for our IT administrators. We tend to automate a lot of things. We can do automation using Graph APIs and save time. It is hard to quantify the time savings, but there has been a medium amount of time savings. Entra has helped to save our organization money. We care about security and risk more than money, but it also saves money. We are premium customers, and because we have a commit-to-consume contract with Microsoft of multi-million dollars, the money does not come into it because we have to consume those resources.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"It is certainly a leading product in the IAM sphere."

"The value gained by taking control of your access data and walking the path towards governance is immense and the progress we made inspired me to pursue a career helping other companies achieve the same success."

"The self-service functionality of One Identity Manager is arguably the most valuable feature."

"One Identity Manager has positively impacted my organization by improving access governance significantly; onboarding is faster, offboarding is more reliable, and audit preparation takes less manual effort than before."

"I consider their support to be very standard, relying on an email-based system."

"The IT shop is a great tool that allows a simple interface for users to see their access, be able to request additional access, and view the workflow approval process to understand where their request is and what any hold-ups may be."

"One Identity Manager automates user provisioning and de-provisioning, enables a faster employee onboarding process, reduces manual work for IT teams, and provides better visibility of who has access and what kind of access each user has."

"I think it's one of the best solutions on the market."

More Identity Manager by One Identity pros

"The solution integrates well with our infrastructure and other systems without any issues."

"Multifactor authentication is valuable."

Cons

"This version, version 8 has been working fine. Version 6 was horrible for us; the performance wasn't good at all."

"A room for improvement in One Identity Manager is its analytics. Though it's getting better from version to version, the analytics feature still needs improvement. I would appreciate more analytical features in the next release of One Identity Manager, so I can do a better analysis. Another vendor, for example, has a self-certification system where you can send people, then create a type of profile or screen for each person, and the person can see his entitlement and the risks behind that entitlement, so then the person makes a decision on whether he wants to keep or let go of it, and that's an out-of-the-box feature that would be good to see in One Identity Manager. Another feature I'd like to see in One Identity Manager that would be very interesting is integration with SIEM or any log collection product for both access and usage. For example, I'd be able to see that I have access to a particular application and also get information on how many times I've accessed it in the last year, last few months, etc. It's a feature that would be great to have in One Identity Manager."

"It's costlier than some other products and there is nothing that fits every solution."

"One area that could be improved is the speed of performance - it's often a bit slower because of the size of its database."

"Overall, One Identity Manager is a really good and very powerful product. However, Starling Connect could have been a little better."

"The client application should transition to a web-based interface to improve administration flexibility. Improvements are also needed in the analytics, peer comparison, and recommendation features, as these areas were added later and require more development. More flexibility in the portal is needed for multi-tenant environments."

"The support from One Identity is very poor. The response is often delayed and lacks actionable advice, such as suggesting updates without confidence in their effectiveness."

"The primary drawback of One Identity Manager is the customization of the WebGUI."

More Identity Manager by One Identity cons

"We use a third-party API called Nebula API to integrate the account for authorization. The time-bound access area in Entra can be a problem. It can be improved in terms of the granularity of the permissions."

"The solution's pricing and support services need improvement."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"It is fairly priced because they provide all the features by default. That is why they charge a bit more than other vendors. I am not sure about the exact cost part, but One Identity is a little bit more expensive than IBM and other tools."

"I am aware of the cost. For us, it is quite cost-efficient. We have a good enterprise license agreement, and we are very happy with what we get for the price we pay for it."

"One Identity isn't cheap for small or medium-sized businesses, but I don't think it's necessary for a small company to use. The price is fair for large enterprises with thousands of employees that want to adopt a zero-trust model."

"The solution is flexible, in general. You can define the parts of the solution that you want to use, and it won't affect the price."

"One Identity Manager's pricing is competitive and in line with what other companies offer."

"One Identity Manager is fairly priced."

"We are using a self-built solution. It would cost too much to get that up to the standard of what we need. In the long-term, it is cheaper to buy a solution that has what we need. Though, we are still running the previous solution, as we are still in the implementation phase."

"The pricing is okay."

More Identity Manager by One Identity pricing and cost advice

"The product cost is in the mid to high range."

"We are a Fortune 500 company, so we always negotiate with Microsoft."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Identity Governance Administration (IGA) solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

913,924 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Outsourcing Company

20%

Financial Services Firm

10%

Construction Company

Comms Service Provider

Financial Services Firm

18%

Computer Software Company

18%

Outsourcing Company

Government

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	120
Midsize Enterprise	35
Large Enterprise	128

No data available

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for One Identity Manager?

As an end-user, I do not have in-depth knowledge of the pricing and setup costs, but I believe the organization should plan and implement integration services during deployment. Overall, it has pro...

See all answers

What needs improvement with One Identity Manager?

The current version of the IT shop or the web portal is a little cumbersome, especially for non-technical users, and I think improving that and making it more user-friendly would be a huge leap for...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for One Identity Manager?

My main use case for Identity Manager by One Identity is account lifecycle, governance of groups, and attestations. I onboard employees, give their birthright security groups, licensing, and then m...

See all answers

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Comparisons

SailPoint Identity Security Cloud vs Identity Manager by One Identity

Compared 10% of the time

Microsoft Entra ID vs Identity Manager by One Identity

Compared 6% of the time

Microsoft Entra ID Protection vs Identity Manager by One Identity

Compared 5% of the time

Saviynt Identity Cloud vs Identity Manager by One Identity

Compared 4% of the time

Oracle Identity Governance vs Identity Manager by One Identity

Compared 4% of the time

More Identity Manager by One Identity Competitors

TrendAI Vision One – Cloud Security vs Microsoft Entra Permissions Management [EOL]

Compared 17% of the time

SailPoint Identity Security Cloud vs Microsoft Entra Permissions Management [EOL]

Compared 11% of the time

Microsoft Intune vs Microsoft Entra Permissions Management [EOL]

Compared 9% of the time

Saviynt Identity Cloud vs Microsoft Entra Permissions Management [EOL]

Compared 7% of the time

Azure Bastion vs Microsoft Entra Permissions Management [EOL]

Compared 3% of the time

More Microsoft Entra Permissions Management [EOL] Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Identity Manager by One Identity

September 2026

Download Identity Manager by One Identity product report

Buyer's Guide

Cloud Infrastructure Entitlement Management (CIEM)

September 2026

Microsoft Entra Permissions Management [EOL] report

Download Microsoft Entra Permissions Management [EOL] product report

Also Known As

Quest One Identity Manager

CloudKnox Permissions Management

Overview

One Identity Manager offers centralized identity management with strong audit and compliance support, lifecycle automation, and streamlined access provisioning. It integrates with systems like SAP, Active Directory, and cloud platforms to enhance security and efficiency.

One Identity Manager provides extensive customization and flexible role-based access control, making it an effective tool for managing identities across different environments. Its centralized system supports lifecycle automation and offers seamless integration with multiple platforms, such as SAP and Active Directory. With robust audit and compliance tools, it helps organizations improve security and operational efficiency. Although there is room for improvement in database performance and user interface design, its current features offer substantial time savings and error reduction through effective automation and governance capabilities.

What are the standout features?

Extensive Customization: Tailor solutions to fit specific needs.
Role-Based Access Control: Flexible management based on roles.
Centralized Identity Management: Single interface for all identity processes.
Lifecycle Automation: Automate onboarding and de-provisioning.
Integration Capabilities: Links with SAP, Active Directory, cloud platforms.
Audit and Compliance Support: Strong tools for security and compliance.

What benefits and ROI should be expected?

Time Savings: Reduce manual identity processes.
Operational Efficiency: Streamline complex workflows.
Improved Security: Enhance compliance and reduce risks.
Error Reduction: Minimize manual errors through automation.
Comprehensive Visibility: Better insight into identity processes.

One Identity Manager is widely implemented across industries like finance, healthcare, and manufacturing. In finance, it ensures compliance with stringent regulations by automating user access audits and approval workflows. Healthcare organizations use it to manage access in complex environments, ensuring patient data confidentiality. Manufacturing industries benefit from its integration capabilities, enabling seamless workflows across multiple systems and enhancing productivity.

One Identity

Microsoft Entra Permissions Management [EOL] provides robust access control and identity management, enhancing security by optimizing permissions and reducing risk.

This advanced platform offers comprehensive capabilities designed to streamline identity management. It empowers organizations to manage permissions efficiently, enhancing security frameworks while addressing compliance needs. By focusing on visibility and control, it optimizes access to ensure the right resources are available to the right users, reducing excessive permission grants and potential security vulnerabilities.

What are the main features of Microsoft Entra Permissions Management [EOL]?

Advanced Visibility: Gain insights into permissions to identify and address security risks.
Access Optimization: Align permissions with actual usage to prevent over-privileged access.
Compliance Integration: Streamline compliance processes with built-in reporting tools.

What benefits should you consider when evaluating Microsoft Entra Permissions Management [EOL]?

Improved Security Posture: Reduces risk by eliminating excessive permissions.
Enhanced Compliance: Eases regulatory compliance with robust auditing features.
Operational Efficiency: Saves time and resources by automating permission management.

In specific industries like finance and healthcare, Microsoft Entra Permissions Management [EOL] plays a crucial role in maintaining data integrity and regulatory compliance. Its implementation allows organizations to seamlessly integrate permission management into existing security infrastructures, providing tailored solutions that address sector-specific requirements and challenges.

Microsoft

Sample Customers

Texas A&M, Sky Media, BHF Bank, Swiss Post, Union Investment, Wayne State University. More at OneIdentity.com/casestudies

Information Not Available

Buyer's Guide

Identity Governance Administration (IGA)

September 2026

Download Free Report

Find out what your peers are saying about One Identity, SailPoint, Omada and others in Identity Governance Administration (IGA). Updated: September 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

913,924 professionals have used our research since 2012.

We monitor all Identity Governance Administration (IGA) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.