What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for One Identity Manager?

We use multiple tools in tandem for better security. The procurement and licensing process can indeed be complex. My experience was decent, with no major problems during procurement or licensing; it was a mostly seamless experience.

One Identity Manager is not cheap at all, which is a significant drawback for small to mid-sized companies. Only large enterprises can afford the licensing fees, and the pricing needs to drop. They could consider developing a mini version for smaller companies, similar to Microsoft's approach.

The cost is handled by customers, but it doesn't seem to be very expensive. It seems fairly priced.

The pricing for One Identity Manager is competitive in our region, so there is no issue with the license pricing. However, aside from the license for the StarLink apps, the cost is justified.

One Identity Manager is positioned as a premium product. It falls between middle and high in terms of cost, approximately a six to seven if ten is expensive.

My clients have been using it for a long time now. They have looked at other products as well, so it seems worth the price.

We are in the upper quarter regarding cost, so it's expensive. However, it is definitely a product with the best future perspective. In terms of function and support, it offers a fair price yet remains an expensive product.

Pricing depends on licensing models, such as per-user licensing and feature-based pricing. Additional models like governance, provisioning, and reporting increase costs. Cloud or on-premises models follow different pricing approaches. On-premises might incur higher costs. The cost also depends on integration systems like Active Directory, SAP, and custom connector requirements. Scalability influences costs, with larger organizations potentially benefiting from cloud setups. Cloud setups might be more cost-efficient compared to on-premises solutions.

Investing in One Identity Manager is necessary for regulatory compliance. Although it might not directly bring in business, it prevents issues like tool compliance. The pricing is reasonable compared to other solutions.

One Identity Manager is priced in the middle range but offers good value due to lower implementation time compared to competitors. Total cost of ownership is crucial where the main expense is in implementation, not licensing.

It is cost-efficient compared to its competitors. It is cost-effective. I do not know about the other regions, but here in the Middle East, the competitors are almost double the price.

Prices in Turkey are high due to inflation, a challenge we've heard about from our customers. We understand that European consumers may have different expectations, but we must reduce the pricing to attract customers.

I'm not involved in procurement. One Identity isn't the most expensive, but it's not the cheapest. It depends on what the clients need.

One Identity isn't cheap for small or medium-sized businesses, but I don't think it's necessary for a small company to use. The price is fair for large enterprises with thousands of employees that want to adopt a zero-trust model.

In addition to licensing fees, we may incur costs for professional services if product issues or implementation errors arise beyond our control. While a community exists, support can still be challenging. Furthermore, the product is relatively expensive compared to alternatives. Certification costs are also notably higher, requiring mandatory five to six-day training sessions and exams only offered to groups of 15 to 20 people. This contrasts with other products, such as SailPoint, which offer standalone exams for certification seekers.

The pricing of One Identity Manager is competitive. Compared to its competitors, One Identity is priced quite brilliantly. ForgeRock and Sailpoint cost about 1.5 times, making One Identity quite economical.

One Identity is cost-efficient from a licensing perspective. However, one drawback is that it's expensive on the hardware side for the customer to set up. One Identity's professional services team recommends various components. They lose some of the cost advantage because the hardware is expensive and requires maintenance.

One Identity Manager is expensive.

One Identity Manager's pricing is competitive and in line with what other companies offer. While we may have received a different pricing model due to the multiple Quest products we purchased compared to only One Identity Manager, the overall cost is considered average. We bought the One Identity Manager license from a partner, but they weren't able to assist with implementation because they lacked experience with the product and even tried to steer us toward a different solution.

One Identity Manager is cost-efficient. The license is based on the number of identities we have. We use a One Identity partner, VMDH for our licensing.

One Identity Manager isn't the best solution on the market, but it's cost-effective.

I would advise finding and using a development partner for implementation unless you have a dedicated identity management team. Ensure your environment is licensed properly, as One Identity has an active Compliance department.

One Identity Manager has a reasonable price point. Given the features and functionality it provides, the cost is justified.

Its price is okay.

It is fairly priced because they provide all the features by default. That is why they charge a bit more than other vendors. I am not sure about the exact cost part, but One Identity is a little bit more expensive than IBM and other tools.

One Identity Manager is fairly priced, especially for large corporations or enterprises.

The product is fairly priced.

I cannot speak to the pricing. I don't deal with the licensing.

I don't have access to how much we pay for licenses. That usually depends on how the company negotiates. But I believe the pricing is fair.

One Identity's pricing is similar to that of other products. It might be a little more expensive, but you save time and implementation costs. It's cheaper to implement One Identity compared to Sailpoint and other solutions.

The price of One Identity Manager is cheaper than SailPoint. When we initially suggested SailPoint to some customers they were surprised at the price, so we then suggested One Identity Manager and they went with that. In addition to the licensing fees, there are costs for customization if you want to build custom modules.

It was okay for us. It was not too much for us. It was nearly the same as other products. It was not expensive. We aren't paying any costs in addition to the standard licensing fees. We are just paying for the local support. We are paying for the development requirements to our local partners.

One Identity Manager's pricing is one of its strong points. It is very reasonable compared to other IGA solutions. The licensing cost is per user.

The pricing is good and I think more money is made out of selling professional services than the product itself. Developers who have worked with the product won't need the assistance of professional services. It is easy to implement once you are accustomed to the product. Someone new to the product would need 20-30 days of services a year and in that scenario, it is expensive to develop and maintain.

The licensing for One Identity Manager is per user, per carbon life, specifically, it's per people, and not a per-identity licensing model. For example, if I have two hundred people, or if I have someone with several identities, I'm only paying for it once. I don't remember the exact cost of One Identity Manager because I wasn't the one who paid for the license.

I'm aware there's a license cost for One Identity Manager, but I'm not part of the team who handles licensing, so I'm unable to give pricing information.

One Identity Manager is very efficient for a limited amount of users. It is easy to use and handle. The license price is based on user capacity. However, I cannot speak about the exact costs.

I'm unable to discuss licensing costs for One Identity Manager.

It's not cheap, but the pricing is okay. Other applications cost about the same.

When we started the journey 7+ years ago, there was a limited skill set in the market, and that is still the case today. Like all Identity Management projects, setting firm requirements upfront is important to maintain costs.

One Identity genuinely provides one of the lowest costs for the initial setup of any product while still being a robust suite of tools. Price was a major driving factor in or choice to use One Identity.

There is a one-time licensing cost, and there is also a yearly subscription fee. The fee is related to the number of users and is perhaps $6 or $7 per license per month.

It's costlier than some other products and there is nothing that fits every solution. You have to plan your design in advance based on your needs and user base.

It needs flexibility in the licensing or packaging, because you buy the entire package at once, and sometimes the customers are a bit overwhelmed with whatever they get. I would like if they could cut the licensing or packaging into somewhat smaller things.

It helps us save on licenses for applications because we are following the account lifecycle, as well as account reactivation.