IBM Spectrum Scale vs Red Hat Ceph Storage comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
IBM Logo
1,625 views|1,349 comparisons
100% willing to recommend
Red Hat Logo
4,171 views|3,527 comparisons
80% willing to recommend
Comparison Buyer's Guide
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between IBM Spectrum Scale and Red Hat Ceph Storage based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out in this report how the two Software Defined Storage (SDS) solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI.
To learn more, read our detailed IBM Spectrum Scale vs. Red Hat Ceph Storage Report (Updated: March 2024).
768,246 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pros
"We can have multiple systems within the same file system.""The high performance of the solution is its most valuable aspect. If you compare it to other storage solutions, it's much better.""Technical support has been very helpful. They provide us with pretty good solutions that we can implement moving forward.""It is a scalable solution.""We are using it for monitoring all of our storage.""The profile share is a valuable feature.""The most valuable feature is the ability to share files across different platforms.""It is incredibly scalable and stable."

More IBM Spectrum Scale Pros →

"I like the distributed and self-healing nature of the product.""We use the solution for cloud storage.""Ceph was chosen to maintain exact performance and capacity characteristics for customer cloud.""The most valuable feature is the stability of the product.""The solution is pretty stable.""The configuration of the solution and the user interface are both quite good.""Most valuable features include replication and compression.""Replicated and erasure coded pools have allowed for multiple copies to be kept, easy scale-out of additional nodes, and easy replacement of failed hard drives. The solution continues working even when there are errors."

More Red Hat Ceph Storage Pros →

Cons
"This is probably the biggest challenge, getting everything upgraded, because it just takes time. We wish it was a faster solution to be able to do everything at once, but you have do each node individually. The more nodes, the longer it takes.""Maybe it needs integration with HA.""The pricing and licensing model for this solution are complex and it is sometimes difficult to explain it to customers.""The solution's pricing could be better.""Integration with other vendors is not available.""It would be helpful if there was a graphical user interface that could walk you through the deployment process. The instructions surrounding setup aren't the best. They need to be more step-by-step.""We do have some issues where Spectrum Scale does not work as expected. We have seen our Spectrum Scale servers go down unexpectedly, but because we have a cluster, it does not take out the entire organization.""The biggest problem is that it is not able to provide block storage."

More IBM Spectrum Scale Cons →

"I would like to see better performance and stability when Ceph is in recovery.""It takes some time to re-balance the storage in case of server failure.""I have encountered issues with stability when replication factor was not 3, which is the default and recommended value. Go below 3 and problems will arise.""Geo-replication needs improvement. It is a new feature, and not well supported yet.""This product uses a lot of CPU and network bandwidth. It needs some deduplication features and to use delta for rebalancing.""We have encountered slight integration issues.""Please create a failback solution for OpenStack replication and maybe QoS to allow guaranteed IOPS.""Rebalancing and recovery are a bit slow."

More Red Hat Ceph Storage Cons →

Pricing and Cost Advice
  • "The licensing is based on the number of terabytes."
  • "The licensing model is complex and depends on factors such as the number of processing cores and the amount of storage."
  • "The solution is costly but reliable."
  • More IBM Spectrum Scale Pricing and Cost Advice →

  • "The other big advantage is that Ceph is free software. Compared to traditional SAN based storage, it is very economical."
  • "There is no cost for software."
  • "Most of time, you can get Ceph with the OpenStack solution in a subscription​​ as a bundle.​"
  • "We never used the paid support."
  • "If you can afford a product like Red Hat Ceph Storage then go for it. If you cannot, then you need to test Ceph and get your hands dirty."
  • "The price of this product isn't high."
  • "The price of Red Hat Ceph Storage is reasonable."
  • "The operational overhead is higher compared to Azure because we own the hardware."
  • More Red Hat Ceph Storage Pricing and Cost Advice →

    report
    Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Software Defined Storage (SDS) solutions are best for your needs.
    768,246 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Questions from the Community
    Top Answer:Red Hat Ceph does well in simplifying storage integration by replacing the need for numerous storage solutions. This solution allows for multiple copies of replicated and coded pools to be kept, easy… more »
    Top Answer:We have not encountered any stability issues for the product.
    Top Answer:Red Hat Ceph Storage is difficult to maintain. We use CLI tools for maintenance, and the concept seems challenging. Additionally, it is difficult to expand the product due to balancing errors. It… more »
    Ranking
    Views
    1,625
    Comparisons
    1,349
    Reviews
    2
    Average Words per Review
    202
    Rating
    9.5
    Views
    4,171
    Comparisons
    3,527
    Reviews
    8
    Average Words per Review
    340
    Rating
    7.7
    Comparisons
    Also Known As
    Ceph
    Learn More
    IBM
    Video Not Available
    Overview
    IBM Spectrum Scale is a cluster file system that provides concurrent access to a single file system or set of file systems from multiple nodes. The nodes can be SAN attached, network attached, a mixture of SAN attached and network attached, or in a shared nothing cluster configuration. This enables access to this common set of data to support a scale-out solution or to provide a high availability platform. IBM Spectrum Scale has many features beyond common data access including data replication, policy based storage management, and multi-site operations. You can create a cluster of AIX nodes, Linux nodes, Windows server nodes, or a mix of all three. IBM Spectrum Scale can run on virtualized instances providing common data access in environments, leverage logical partitioning, or other hypervisors. Multiple IBM Spectrum Scale clusters can share data within a location or across wide area network (WAN) connections.
    Red Hat Ceph Storage is an enterprise open source platform that provides unified software-defined storage on standard, economical servers and disks. With block, object, and file storage combined into one platform, Red Hat Ceph Storage efficiently and automatically manages all your data.
    Sample Customers
    Information Not Available
    Dell, DreamHost
    Top Industries
    REVIEWERS
    Financial Services Firm63%
    Computer Software Company25%
    Comms Service Provider13%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Financial Services Firm19%
    Computer Software Company14%
    Manufacturing Company10%
    Government8%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Computer Software Company18%
    Manufacturing Company10%
    Financial Services Firm9%
    Government7%
    Company Size
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business30%
    Large Enterprise70%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business19%
    Midsize Enterprise11%
    Large Enterprise70%
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business37%
    Midsize Enterprise15%
    Large Enterprise48%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business25%
    Midsize Enterprise15%
    Large Enterprise61%
    Buyer's Guide
    IBM Spectrum Scale vs. Red Hat Ceph Storage
    March 2024
    Find out what your peers are saying about IBM Spectrum Scale vs. Red Hat Ceph Storage and other solutions. Updated: March 2024.
    768,246 professionals have used our research since 2012.

    IBM Spectrum Scale is ranked 7th in Software Defined Storage (SDS) with 10 reviews while Red Hat Ceph Storage is ranked 3rd in Software Defined Storage (SDS) with 22 reviews. IBM Spectrum Scale is rated 8.4, while Red Hat Ceph Storage is rated 8.2. The top reviewer of IBM Spectrum Scale writes "A stable solution with valuable profile-sharing features". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Red Hat Ceph Storage writes "Provides block storage and object storage from the same storage cluster". IBM Spectrum Scale is most compared with Portworx Enterprise, VMware vSAN, DDN IME, NetApp Cloud Volumes ONTAP and IBM Cloud Object Storage, whereas Red Hat Ceph Storage is most compared with MinIO, VMware vSAN, Portworx Enterprise, Pure Storage FlashBlade and Intel DAOS. See our IBM Spectrum Scale vs. Red Hat Ceph Storage report.

    See our list of best Software Defined Storage (SDS) vendors, best Software Defined Storage (SDS) vendors, and best Cloud Software Defined Storage vendors.

    We monitor all Software Defined Storage (SDS) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.