We performed a comparison between IBM PurePower System and IBM VersaStack based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Dell Technologies, NetApp, Hewlett Packard Enterprise and others in Converged Infrastructure."We never have any issues or glitches."
"Replication and DR implementation became faster."
"The combination of Cisco's architecture and IBM's flash technology. Cisco provides FI technology which provides one simple architecture. IBM's flash technology is fast."
"The solution has high IOPS and the I/O is important because it gives us more transactions per second."
"The management is really difficult when it comes to systems with traditional services."
"The solution should improve deduplication to get a lot of savings."
"Raw data mapping for storage should be a given option."
Earn 20 points
IBM PurePower System is ranked 11th in Converged Infrastructure while IBM VersaStack is ranked 8th in Converged Infrastructure with 3 reviews. IBM PurePower System is rated 8.0, while IBM VersaStack is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of IBM PurePower System writes "Easy to work on and has never had any glitches or issues ". On the other hand, the top reviewer of IBM VersaStack writes "A very high IOPS that gives more I/O transactions per second". IBM PurePower System is most compared with , whereas IBM VersaStack is most compared with Dell VxBlock System.
See our list of best Converged Infrastructure vendors.
We monitor all Converged Infrastructure reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.