IBM VersaStack vs Oracle Private Cloud Appliance comparison

IBM and Oracle are both solutions in the Converged Infrastructure category. IBM is ranked #10, while Oracle is ranked #5 with an average rating of 10.0. IBM holds a 1.3% mindshare in CI, compared to Oracle’s 15.6% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of IBM users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 85% of Oracle users who would recommend it.

IBM VersaStack

Read 3 IBM VersaStack reviews

137 Views
55 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Oracle Private Cloud Appliance

Read 5 Oracle Private Cloud Appliance reviews

653 Views
295 Comparison Views

85% willing to recommend

IBM VersaStack

Oracle Private Cloud Appliance

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Feb 2, 2025

IBM VersaStack and Oracle Private Cloud Appliance compete in integrated infrastructure systems. Data suggests Oracle Private Cloud Appliance holds an advantage due to its comprehensive feature set, making it appealing despite IBM VersaStack's attractive pricing and support.

Features: IBM VersaStack integrates with Cisco networking and storage for streamlined data management, offers simplified deployment, and provides competitive pricing. Oracle Private Cloud Appliance optimizes the convergence of compute, networking, and storage within Oracle environments, supports a wider array of Oracle software and databases, and offers robust scalability.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: IBM VersaStack simplifies deployment through tightly integrated IBM and Cisco hardware, with multilingual support enhancing customer satisfaction. Oracle Private Cloud Appliance provides seamless setup, particularly for businesses reliant on Oracle products, though IBM’s multilingual support is seen as advantageous.

Pricing and ROI: IBM VersaStack is noted for competitive setup costs and favorable ROI due to efficient resource allocation in hybrid cloud environments. Oracle Private Cloud Appliance, though associated with higher initial expenses, is viewed as yielding significant ROI over time, especially for organizations integrated within the Oracle ecosystem, due to its extensive support for Oracle-centric workloads.

To learn more, read our detailed IBM VersaStack vs. Oracle Private Cloud Appliance Report (Updated: April 2025).

Buyer's Guide

IBM VersaStack vs. Oracle Private Cloud Appliance

April 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 850,028 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

IBM VersaStack

Ranking in Converged Infrastructure

10th

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

7.4

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Oracle Private Cloud Appliance

Ranking in Converged Infrastructure

5th

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

7.0

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of May 2025, in the Converged Infrastructure category, the mindshare of IBM VersaStack is 1.3%, down from 2.8% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Oracle Private Cloud Appliance is 15.6%, up from 10.4% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Converged Infrastructure

Featured Reviews

reviewer2058714

Infrastructure Head at a program development consultancy with 11-50 employees

A very high IOPS that gives more I/O transactions per second

Scalability used to be an issue so at that time it was rated an eight out of ten. We have become OPEX-based and rent storage from them. Physical storage is about 200% of our requirements but we only pay for what we use. This resolved all of our scalability issues. When we reach a certain threshold like 100%, OPEX calls us and asks if we want to add more storage. Our total capacity right now is 300 terabytes but we are only using around 200 terabytes. We bought the storage two years ago and our projections are on par. We don't need more capacity now but have plans to increase in another two years. With our OPEX storage, scalability is rated a nine out of ten.

Read full review

MohamedKhalifa

Database and Middleware Technical Head at Riyadh Municipality

A highly efficient choice for deploying scalable and reliable middleware applications

The most valuable features include distinct storage within the Oracle PCA. This separate storage is crucial as it serves both primary and secondary purposes. Additionally, high-priority elements encompass Lava switches for network functionality. Recent efforts have focused on efficient patching of the entire PCA stack, covering the master node, computing nodes, network switches, and storage components.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The combination of Cisco's architecture and IBM's flash technology. Cisco provides FI technology which provides one simple architecture. IBM's flash technology is fast."

"The solution has high IOPS and the I/O is important because it gives us more transactions per second."

"Replication and DR implementation became faster."

"It is scalable as the box can be increased by one compute node, if required."

"You will find the high availability and License Team with Oracle very valuable."

"The most valuable features include distinct storage within the Oracle PCA."

"It has helped us to reduce Oracle licensing costs for database and applications."

"Supports connection to most of network topology, such as VLAN and network segmentation."

Cons

"Raw data mapping for storage should be a given option."

"The solution should improve deduplication to get a lot of savings."

"The initial setup was very complex."

"OVM Manager Interface is using HTML5. It should be reconverted to be a Java interface."

"In comparison to competitors like VMware, there's a perceived need for Oracle to enhance OVM, making it more flexible and user-friendly."

"Patching processing takes a long time. Only one compute node is patched at a time."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The solution is enterprise level so it is expensive."

"If you have many Oracle products, such as databases, middleware, and apps, it will help you reduce Oracle app licences and support costs."

"It is relatively cost-effective."

"It is more expensive than the normal solution or the hyper-converged system."

"No licenses for the shipped software or firmware."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Converged Infrastructure solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

850,028 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

No data available

Computer Software Company

26%

Government

14%

Financial Services Firm

13%

Comms Service Provider

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

Questions from the Community

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

What do you like most about Oracle Private Cloud Appliance?

The most valuable features include distinct storage within the Oracle PCA.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Oracle Private Cloud Appliance?

In comparison to competitors like VMware, there's a perceived need for Oracle to enhance OVM, making it more flexible and user-friendly. We believe that improvements in this aspect would contribute...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Oracle Private Cloud Appliance?

We use it in conjunction with OVM Oracle VM Manager to create virtual machines for diverse Oracle middleware products, including Oracle Solar, PPM, Service Bus, and Logix. Our organization heavily ...

See all answers

Comparisons

No data available

HPE ConvergedSystem vs Oracle Private Cloud Appliance

Compared 24% of the time

Rackspace OpenStack vs Oracle Private Cloud Appliance

Compared 20% of the time

FlexPod XCS vs Oracle Private Cloud Appliance

Compared 19% of the time

Dell VxBlock System vs Oracle Private Cloud Appliance

Compared 18% of the time

Oracle SuperCluster vs Oracle Private Cloud Appliance

Compared 18% of the time

More Oracle Private Cloud Appliance Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Converged Infrastructure

March 2025

Download IBM VersaStack product report

Buyer's Guide

Oracle Private Cloud Appliance

April 2025

Download Oracle Private Cloud Appliance product report

Overview

VersaStack is a converged infrastructure solution of network, compute and storage designed for quick deployment and rapid time to value. The solution includes Cisco UCS integrated infrastructure together with IBM software- defined storage solutions to deliver extraordinary levels of agility and efficiency. VersaStack is backed by Cisco Validated Designs and IBM Redbooks application guides for faster infrastructure delivery as well as workload/ application deployment.

Designed for dynamic organizations that want to accelerate business growth while reducing costs, VersaStack incorporates IBM all-flash as well as hybrid storage technologies into the “single pane of glass” management environment provided by Cisco UCS Director. The solution offers quick deployment and execution of business applications—with the versatility to adapt as business priorities change. Providing an IT infrastructure that is easy, efficient and versatile, VersaStack helps accelerate data center infrastructure deployment and helps efficiently manage information and resources amid business change.

IBM

Oracle Private Cloud Appliance, is an integrated infrastructure system engineered to enable rapid deployment of converged compute, network, and storage technologies for hosting applications or workloads on a guest OS. It is a data center-class system that provides incremental and scalable performance optimized for consolidation of mixed workloads.

Oracle

Sample Customers

Newhall Hospital, Medicat, JJ Haines, Sigmax

Agnitum Information Technologies, Mediacloud, Xait AS, Atos Global Managed Services, CaixaBI, ICA AB, BT Spain, Secure-24, Xait

Buyer's Guide

IBM VersaStack vs. Oracle Private Cloud Appliance

April 2025

Free Report: IBM VersaStack vs. Oracle Private Cloud Appliance

Find out what your peers are saying about IBM VersaStack vs. Oracle Private Cloud Appliance and other solutions. Updated: April 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

850,028 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our IBM VersaStack vs. Oracle Private Cloud Appliance report.

See our list of best Converged Infrastructure vendors.

We monitor all Converged Infrastructure reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.