IBM Open Liberty vs Oracle Fusion Middleware comparison

IBM and Oracle are both solutions in the Application Server category. IBM is ranked #7 with an average rating of 10.0, while Oracle is ranked #6 with an average rating of 8.3. IBM holds a 2.1% mindshare in AppS, compared to Oracle’s 5.4% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of IBM users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 88% of Oracle users who would recommend it.

IBM Open Liberty

Read 2 IBM Open Liberty reviews

1,894 Views
133 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Oracle Fusion Middleware

Read 16 Oracle Fusion Middleware reviews

1,207 Views
1,183 Comparison Views

88% willing to recommend

IBM Open Liberty

Oracle Fusion Middleware

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Aug 31, 2025

Oracle Fusion Middleware and IBM Open Liberty are competing in the middleware space. IBM Open Liberty has an advantage due to its flexibility and developer-friendly environment, whereas Oracle Fusion Middleware is known for its comprehensive integration and security features.

Features: Oracle Fusion Middleware provides strong integration capabilities, a robust security framework, and enterprise-level support. IBM Open Liberty offers a lightweight architecture, microservices support, and a flexible development environment conducive to innovation.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: IBM Open Liberty ensures a straightforward and flexible deployment process, emphasizing seamless microservices integration with effective support for agile transformations. Oracle Fusion Middleware offers comprehensive features but often involves more complex setups and configurations.

Pricing and ROI: Oracle Fusion Middleware entails higher setup costs with substantial ROI through its extensive features. IBM Open Liberty, with a more cost-effective setup, allows quicker ROI thanks to its agile and innovative approach.

To learn more, read our detailed IBM Open Liberty vs. Oracle Fusion Middleware Report (Updated: October 2025).

Buyer's Guide

IBM Open Liberty vs. Oracle Fusion Middleware

October 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 869,202 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

IBM Open Liberty

Ranking in Application Server

7th

Average Rating

10.0

Reviews Sentiment

2.8

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Oracle Fusion Middleware

Ranking in Application Server

6th

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

6.5

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of October 2025, in the Application Server category, the mindshare of IBM Open Liberty is 2.1%. The mindshare of Oracle Fusion Middleware is 5.4%, up from 5.3% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Application Server Market Share Distribution
Product	Market Share (%)
Oracle Fusion Middleware	5.4%
IBM Open Liberty	2.1%
Other	92.5%

Application Server

Featured Reviews

FABIO LUIS VELLOSO DA SILVA

Partner at SouJava

Has enabled flexible deployment of modular services with high availability and smooth dynamic updates

The best features of IBM Open Liberty are the implementation of MicroProfile and Jakarta EE, along with fault tolerance and high availability. It's easy to use and deploy new features. The profile is easy to configure and set up features. For example, using fault tolerance from MicroProfile or using servlets or JAX-RS allows for easy configuration and creation of modular applications. The configuration is modular. The main point for us in this project was high availability, high performance, and the implementation of MicroProfile and Jakarta EE. We utilized the modular architecture of IBM Open Liberty by creating different microservices using different environments. We created different configurations for different services using the configuration of IBM Open Liberty. This was very beneficial. We created different environments only by changing the configuration, depending on the functionality we needed. It was good and very flexible for us. I used the dynamic updates feature of IBM Open Liberty and different configurations in different services and servers, based on the functionality we provided for our clients. The flexibility to create different services in different environments using IBM Open Liberty was important. The high availability is guaranteed by the architecture of IBM Open Liberty, Java, and MicroProfile. The architecture guaranteed high availability, and the flexibility comes from being able to configure needed features. There's no need to load all WebSphere or functionalities in all environments. I can configure it and create a more highly available and scalable process. I implemented monitoring tools for IBM Open Liberty using Grafana and OpenTracing using the functionalities from MicroProfile and IBM Open Liberty. The monitoring tools helped with managing system performance.

Read full review

Sai Kri

Assistant Manager Business Applications at NMC Healthcare

Migration to a modern interface enhances AI integration and cloud capabilities

Presently, Oracle recommends migrating to Oracle Fusion since it's a hot product now. e-Business Suite may soon be sunsetted and has an outdated UI, with few upgrades. In contrast, Oracle Fusion offers modern features, such as AI, cloud-based applications, and customization options like Redwood features. Oracle Fusion AI chatbots are embedded, benefiting projects.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"It is a stable solution compared to other vendors."

"The flexibility to create different services in different environments using IBM Open Liberty was important."

"The initial setup is easy. There are many self-tutorial videos are on the Internet, and then the Oracle documents are self-explanatory."

"I rate my overall experience with Oracle Fusion Middleware as nine out of ten points."

"Data integrity."

"It is really good in terms of features, and it is stable."

"I rate Oracle Fusion Middleware as ten out of ten."

"The most valuable feature is the structure of the product. We use Oracle Fusion Middleware to manage the Oracle database. Registered users can go to each product if sign-on credentials match each user's identical framework."

"The solution is very easy to install."

"The solution is quite good for applying patches or performing upgrades."

More Oracle Fusion Middleware pros

Cons

"To improve IBM Open Liberty, more integration with Kafka and message systems, and asynchronous messaging would be beneficial."

"Its support documentation could have detailed information on database integration."

"Oracle Fusion Middleware is based on the regulations in Saudi Arabia and the legislation changes. There is a need to be improvements all the time. It needs to adapt quickly in this market. Additionally, there could be some improvements in the construction sector."

"The product should improve BPEL features."

"An improvement for Oracle's Fusion Middleware could definitely be found in the SOA component. It's a heavyweight container and, if you ask me, if a product is available as a docker image where we can easily port it in to another Kubernetes platform, that would be perfect. But as for the current situation in the market, nobody is really willing to deploy this on premises."

"Oracle rapidly releases new features, and I may not be ready to adopt them."

"The solution's technical support needs to be improved."

"Oracle Fusion Middleware could improve by offering enhanced and customizable business-related features, particularly in supporting individual businesses or custom applications."

"The price could always be better."

"Oracle rapidly releases new features, and I may not be ready to adopt them."

More Oracle Fusion Middleware cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"It is less costly than one of its competitors."

"The solution is expensive so pricing is rated a six out of ten."

"We pay annually for the solution."

"It is expensive. We are looking for a cheaper solution."

"The pricing is moderate. It's fine."

"My advice is to buy the basic modules first, gain the most benefit from them, then buy the advanced modules."

"The licensing costs are reasonable."

"The solution is quite expensive so is only used by larger organizations."

"The tool is best suited for large companies due to high licensing costs."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Application Server solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

869,202 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

51%

Computer Software Company

Manufacturing Company

Government

Computer Software Company

12%

Financial Services Firm

11%

Manufacturing Company

11%

Government

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	3
Midsize Enterprise	2
Large Enterprise	10

Questions from the Community

What needs improvement with Open Liberty?

To improve IBM Open Liberty, more integration with Kafka and message systems, and asynchronous messaging would be beneficial. Having more integration with Kafka, Mongo, and middleware systems that ...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Open Liberty?

I used IBM Open Liberty for an application for financial services using IBM Open Liberty and MicroProfile to process data for financial services work.

See all answers

What advice do you have for others considering Open Liberty?

I used IBM Open Liberty in the past in a project, but today I'm not using it anymore. I had a good experience working with it in a financial services company. This was very beneficial. My review ra...

See all answers

What do you like most about Oracle Fusion Middleware?

The most valuable features are Oracle Unified Directory and unified identity access management.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Oracle Fusion Middleware?

Oracle Fusion Middleware is generally expensive, although I'm not directly involved with the licensing aspects.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Oracle Fusion Middleware?

There could be improvements in the installation and integration parts of Oracle Fusion Middleware. The guides often have errors, such as web scripting issues, and can be difficult to follow. With m...

See all answers

Comparisons

Spring Boot vs IBM Open Liberty

Compared 78% of the time

IBM WebSphere Liberty vs IBM Open Liberty

Compared 7% of the time

Helidon vs IBM Open Liberty

Compared 5% of the time

Tomcat vs IBM Open Liberty

Compared 4% of the time

Spring MVC vs IBM Open Liberty

Compared 3% of the time

More IBM Open Liberty Competitors

Oracle WebLogic Server vs Oracle Fusion Middleware

Compared 62% of the time

Red Hat JBoss Enterprise Application Platform (EAP) vs Oracle Fusion Middleware

Compared 11% of the time

IBM WebSphere Application Server vs Oracle Fusion Middleware

Compared 11% of the time

Tomcat vs Oracle Fusion Middleware

Compared 11% of the time

IIS vs Oracle Fusion Middleware

Compared 5% of the time

More Oracle Fusion Middleware Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Application Server

September 2025

Download IBM Open Liberty product report

Buyer's Guide

Oracle Fusion Middleware

September 2025

Download Oracle Fusion Middleware product report

Overview

IBM Open Liberty is a highly adaptable and lightweight Java runtime, designed to cater to modern cloud-native applications. Its flexibility and commitment to open source makes it a valuable asset for developers seeking ease of deployment and scalability.

IBM Open Liberty stands out for its ease of integration into cloud environments and its emphasis on developer productivity. It permits quick iterations with minimal overhead, thanks in part to its support for MicroProfile and Jakarta EE. This allows for streamlined deployment processes, making contemporary software development more efficient.

What are the valuable features of IBM Open Liberty?

Lightweight Server: Minimizes resource consumption, enabling faster performance.
Dev Mode: Provides a real-time feedback loop, simplifying development cycles.
MicroProfile Support: Assists in building microservices architecture effectively.
Jakarta EE Support: Ensures compatibility with enterprise standards.

What are the benefits or ROI to consider?

Scalability: Adapts easily to increasing workloads while maintaining performance.
Cost Efficiency: Reduces operational costs by optimizing server usage.
Developer Productivity: Accelerates development through intuitive tooling.
Cloud Readiness: Facilitates seamless integration with cloud platforms.

IBM Open Liberty finds applications across multiple industries. In finance, it supports robust transactional systems. In telecommunications, it enhances service delivery with reliable microservices infrastructure. Health care benefits from its compliance capabilities, facilitating secure data management and faster application delivery.

IBM

Oracle Fusion Middleware is the digital business platform for the enterprise and the cloud. It enables enterprises to create and run agile, intelligent business applications while maximizing IT efficiency through full utilization of modern hardware and software architectures.

Oracle

Sample Customers

Information Not Available

Police Department of Izmir City

Buyer's Guide

IBM Open Liberty vs. Oracle Fusion Middleware

October 2025

Free Report: IBM Open Liberty vs. Oracle Fusion Middleware

Find out what your peers are saying about IBM Open Liberty vs. Oracle Fusion Middleware and other solutions. Updated: October 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

869,202 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our IBM Open Liberty vs. Oracle Fusion Middleware report.

See our list of best Application Server vendors.

We monitor all Application Server reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.