We performed a comparison between IIS and Oracle Fusion Middleware based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Application Server solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."The product is stable."
"The solution has been reliable."
"The most valuable feature of IIS is that it's free, and it works."
"IIS has a very simple and user-friendly interface, which helps a lot in effective and efficient management."
"The product is easy to configure."
"Windows Server IIS is stable."
"The tool is very easy to use and efficient."
"The solution is simple and very easy to manage compared to Linux."
"The solution is quite good for applying patches or performing upgrades."
"Oracle Service Bus is the most valuable feature of the solution."
"It is really good in terms of features, and it is stable."
"Data integrity."
"The most valuable features are Oracle Unified Directory and unified identity access management."
"The initial setup is easy. There are many self-tutorial videos are on the Internet, and then the Oracle documents are self-explanatory."
"Fusion Middleware's main feature for me is that it is quite flexible, and, as middleware, it provides us with all sorts of technology and application adapters, which makes it very handy to use."
"The scalability is good."
"Presently, some developers do not have technical knowledge of managing IIS, so that needs to be improved in the next release."
"I am using an older version of Windows Server IIS and the general management and navigation to get something done is not as straightforward as I hope it to be. The interface could be improved."
"The areas of this solution that need improvement are monitoring, debugging, and troubleshooting."
"IIS could improve by having some features related to ASR and HTTPS certificate generation."
"The platform's stability could be better."
"The solution must improve the integration between its databases."
"The price of the solution could be less to improve."
"The solution's stability needs improvement."
"The documentation might not be good enough for new users."
"The price could always be better."
"All areas of HCM modules could use some improvement."
"Oracle Fusion Middleware is based on the regulations in Saudi Arabia and the legislation changes. There is a need to be improvements all the time. It needs to adapt quickly in this market. Additionally, there could be some improvements in the construction sector."
"An improvement for Oracle's Fusion Middleware could definitely be found in the SOA component. It's a heavyweight container and, if you ask me, if a product is available as a docker image where we can easily port it in to another Kubernetes platform, that would be perfect. But as for the current situation in the market, nobody is really willing to deploy this on premises."
"Oracle Fusion Middleware could improve by offering enhanced and customizable business-related features, particularly in supporting individual businesses or custom applications."
"The main improvement must be made on the user interface. You need to use another Oracle cross in this product. It must be improved and some features of the connectors must be changed."
"I would rate the stability a nine out of ten because we did have multiple breakdowns and crashes."
IIS is ranked 4th in Application Server with 53 reviews while Oracle Fusion Middleware is ranked 6th in Application Server with 12 reviews. IIS is rated 8.0, while Oracle Fusion Middleware is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of IIS writes " A simple and easy-to-use solution but not recommended for public apps". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Oracle Fusion Middleware writes "Maintains top database performance and includes a very good ATB feature". IIS is most compared with NGINX Plus, Apache Web Server, Oracle WebLogic Server, Tomcat and Oracle GlassFish, whereas Oracle Fusion Middleware is most compared with Oracle WebLogic Server, Tomcat, IBM WebSphere Application Server, JBoss and TIBCO ActiveMatrix. See our IIS vs. Oracle Fusion Middleware report.
See our list of best Application Server vendors.
We monitor all Application Server reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
