IBM Open Liberty vs Jakarta EE comparison

The compared IBM and Eclipse Foundation solutions aren't in the same category. IBM is ranked #7 in AppS , with an average rating of 10.0, and holds a 4.7% mindshare in the category. Eclipse Foundation is ranked #3 in JF , and holds a 17.0% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of IBM users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 66% of Eclipse Foundation users who would recommend it.

IBM Open Liberty

Read 2 IBM Open Liberty reviews

2,040 Views
530 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Jakarta EE

Read 3 Jakarta EE reviews

2,030 Views
2,010 Comparison Views

66% willing to recommend

IBM Open Liberty

Jakarta EE

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between IBM Open Liberty and Jakarta EE based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about Apache, Red Hat, Oracle and others in Application Server.

To learn more, read our detailed Application Server Report (Updated: May 2026).

Buyer's Guide

Application Server

May 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 896,298 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

IBM Open Liberty

Average Rating

10.0

Reviews Sentiment

2.8

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Application Server (7th)

Jakarta EE

Average Rating

7.4

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Java Frameworks (3rd)

Mindshare comparison

IBM Open Liberty and Jakarta EE aren’t in the same category and serve different purposes. IBM Open Liberty is designed for Application Server and holds a mindshare of 4.7%.
Jakarta EE, on the other hand, focuses on Java Frameworks, holds 17.0% mindshare, down 17.9% since last year.

Application Server Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
IBM Open Liberty	4.7%
Tomcat	12.4%
Red Hat JBoss Enterprise Application Platform (EAP)	11.0%
Other	71.9%

Application Server

Java Frameworks Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
Jakarta EE	17.0%
Spring Boot	29.2%
Apache Spark	11.2%
Other	42.599999999999994%

Java Frameworks

Featured Reviews

FABIO LUIS VELLOSO DA SILVA

Partner at SouJava

Has enabled flexible deployment of modular services with high availability and smooth dynamic updates

The best features of IBM Open Liberty are the implementation of MicroProfile and Jakarta EE, along with fault tolerance and high availability. It's easy to use and deploy new features. The profile is easy to configure and set up features. For example, using fault tolerance from MicroProfile or using servlets or JAX-RS allows for easy configuration and creation of modular applications. The configuration is modular. The main point for us in this project was high availability, high performance, and the implementation of MicroProfile and Jakarta EE. We utilized the modular architecture of IBM Open Liberty by creating different microservices using different environments. We created different configurations for different services using the configuration of IBM Open Liberty. This was very beneficial. We created different environments only by changing the configuration, depending on the functionality we needed. It was good and very flexible for us. I used the dynamic updates feature of IBM Open Liberty and different configurations in different services and servers, based on the functionality we provided for our clients. The flexibility to create different services in different environments using IBM Open Liberty was important. The high availability is guaranteed by the architecture of IBM Open Liberty, Java, and MicroProfile. The architecture guaranteed high availability, and the flexibility comes from being able to configure needed features. There's no need to load all WebSphere or functionalities in all environments. I can configure it and create a more highly available and scalable process. I implemented monitoring tools for IBM Open Liberty using Grafana and OpenTracing using the functionalities from MicroProfile and IBM Open Liberty. The monitoring tools helped with managing system performance.

Read full review

Erick Karanja

Technical Lead at Cellulant Kenya

A robust enterprise Java capabilities with complex configuration involved, making it a powerful choice for scalable applications while requiring a learning curve

When running applications in the cloud, scalability is highly dependent on how you configure it. Factors such as the number of instances you want to scale, and the threshold for scaling based on the quantity of messages or the amount of data, are all customizable based on your application's needs.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"It is a stable solution compared to other vendors."

"The flexibility to create different services in different environments using IBM Open Liberty was important."

"Configuring, monitoring, and ensuring observability is a straightforward process."

"Jakarta EE's best features include REST services, configuration, and persistent facilities. It's also incredibly cloud friendly."

"Eclipse is now on a good track and they have a very good interface."

"The feature that allows a variation of work space based on the application being used."

Cons

"To improve IBM Open Liberty, more integration with Kafka and message systems, and asynchronous messaging would be beneficial."

"Its support documentation could have detailed information on database integration."

"All the customization and all the plugins we can install make the interface too slow and heavy in some situations."

"Jakarta EE's configuration could be simpler, which would make it more useful as a developer experience."

"All the customization and plugins can make the interface too slow and heavy in some situations."

"It would be great if we could have a UI-based approach or easily include the specific dependencies we need."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"It is less costly than one of its competitors."

"I would rate Jakarta EE's pricing seven out of ten."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Application Server solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

896,298 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

44%

Computer Software Company

Insurance Company

Manufacturing Company

Financial Services Firm

15%

Manufacturing Company

11%

Computer Software Company

10%

Comms Service Provider

10%

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

Questions from the Community

What needs improvement with Open Liberty?

To improve IBM Open Liberty, more integration with Kafka and message systems, and asynchronous messaging would be beneficial. Having more integration with Kafka, Mongo, and middleware systems that ...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Open Liberty?

I used IBM Open Liberty for an application for financial services using IBM Open Liberty and MicroProfile to process data for financial services work.

See all answers

What advice do you have for others considering Open Liberty?

I used IBM Open Liberty in the past in a project, but today I'm not using it anymore. I had a good experience working with it in a financial services company. This was very beneficial. My review ra...

See all answers

Which is better - Spring Boot or Jakarta EE?

Our organization ran comparison tests to determine whether the Spring Boot or Jakarta EE application creation software was the better fit for us. We decided to go with Spring Boot. Spring Boot offe...

See all answers

Comparisons

Spring Boot vs IBM Open Liberty

Compared 43% of the time

IBM WebSphere Liberty vs IBM Open Liberty

Compared 13% of the time

Tomcat vs IBM Open Liberty

Compared 13% of the time

Red Hat JBoss Enterprise Application Platform (EAP) vs IBM Open Liberty

Compared 5% of the time

More IBM Open Liberty Competitors

Spring Boot vs Jakarta EE

Compared 57% of the time

Apache Spark vs Jakarta EE

Compared 10% of the time

Spring MVC vs Jakarta EE

Compared 8% of the time

Eclipse MicroProfile vs Jakarta EE

Compared 7% of the time

More Jakarta EE Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Application Server

May 2026

Download IBM Open Liberty product report

Buyer's Guide

Java Frameworks

April 2026

Download Jakarta EE product report

Overview

IBM Open Liberty is a highly adaptable and lightweight Java runtime, designed to cater to modern cloud-native applications. Its flexibility and commitment to open source makes it a valuable asset for developers seeking ease of deployment and scalability.

IBM Open Liberty stands out for its ease of integration into cloud environments and its emphasis on developer productivity. It permits quick iterations with minimal overhead, thanks in part to its support for MicroProfile and Jakarta EE. This allows for streamlined deployment processes, making contemporary software development more efficient.

What are the valuable features of IBM Open Liberty?

Lightweight Server: Minimizes resource consumption, enabling faster performance.
Dev Mode: Provides a real-time feedback loop, simplifying development cycles.
MicroProfile Support: Assists in building microservices architecture effectively.
Jakarta EE Support: Ensures compatibility with enterprise standards.

What are the benefits or ROI to consider?

Scalability: Adapts easily to increasing workloads while maintaining performance.
Cost Efficiency: Reduces operational costs by optimizing server usage.
Developer Productivity: Accelerates development through intuitive tooling.
Cloud Readiness: Facilitates seamless integration with cloud platforms.

IBM Open Liberty finds applications across multiple industries. In finance, it supports robust transactional systems. In telecommunications, it enhances service delivery with reliable microservices infrastructure. Health care benefits from its compliance capabilities, facilitating secure data management and faster application delivery.

IBM

Jakarta EE is a widely recognized framework for building enterprise applications. It facilitates the development of scalable applications by offering a comprehensive set of specifications, fostering a more efficient and reliable environment for developers.

As a robust enterprise platform, Jakarta EE supports the development of dynamic applications through a suite of specifications that ensure consistency, security, and scalability. It enables developers to utilize a broad range of tools, promoting streamlined application transformation while maintaining high-performance standards. Jakarta EE's architecture supports cloud-native development, making it suitable for both traditional and modern applications.

What features stand out in Jakarta EE?

Standardized Environment: Facilitates compatibility and reduces complexity.
Modular Design: Enhances flexibility and scalability of applications.
Developer Tools: Offers a wide array of tools for efficient coding.
Security Protocols: Provides robust security mechanisms.
Cloud-Native Support: Optimizes applications for cloud deployments.

Which benefits should be highlighted in reviews?

Scalability: Seamless expansion of application capabilities.
Efficiency: Streamlined processes boost productivity.
Cost-Effectiveness: Reduces resource usage and overheads.
Reliability: Ensures consistent application performance.
Innovation Support: Adapts to modern technological advancements.

In specialized industries like finance and healthcare, Jakarta EE is implemented to meet demanding regulatory requirements and data integrity standards. In finance, it supports secure transactions and compliance. In healthcare, it aids in handling sensitive patient data efficiently, ensuring both security and accessibility.

Find out what your peers are saying about Apache, Red Hat, Oracle and others in Application Server. Updated: May 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

896,298 professionals have used our research since 2012.

We monitor all Application Server reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.