IBM IGNITE Quality and Test vs Softtek QA and Software Testing Services comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Ranking
Views
456
Comparisons
150
Reviews
0
Average Words per Review
0
Rating
N/A
Views
90
Comparisons
64
Reviews
0
Average Words per Review
0
Rating
N/A
Comparisons
Learn More
IBM
Video Not Available
Overview

Introducing IBM IGNITE Quality and Test, the first platform in the market devoted to quality with speed, instead of just testing. IBM IGNITE Quality and Test delivers through a simple framework – Optimization, Automation and AI Analytics.

Today's software applications are increasingly more intricate, often operating within multi-layer, multi-platform environments, and built in rapid and agile conditions, with ambitious requirements. In this complex scenario, software Quality Assurance and Testing becomes even more critical as a means to improve quality and minimize risk, meeting the market's demands and the organization's needs.

Top Industries
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Financial Services Firm24%
Computer Software Company13%
Comms Service Provider11%
Insurance Company10%
No Data Available
Company Size
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Small Business13%
Midsize Enterprise8%
Large Enterprise79%
No Data Available

IBM IGNITE Quality and Test is ranked 2nd in Application Testing Services while Softtek QA and Software Testing Services is ranked 18th in Application Testing Services. IBM IGNITE Quality and Test is rated 0.0, while Softtek QA and Software Testing Services is rated 0.0. On the other hand, IBM IGNITE Quality and Test is most compared with QualiTest Managed Software Testing Services, whereas Softtek QA and Software Testing Services is most compared with .

See our list of best Application Testing Services vendors.

We monitor all Application Testing Services reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.