We performed a comparison between Hyper-V and Nutanix Cloud Infrastructure (NCI) based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Proxmox, VMware, Microsoft and others in Server Virtualization Software."It helps us build servers."
"It is stable."
"With each update, the security of this solution just gets better and better. It is very stable."
"The simplicity and intuitiveness of the platform. It was a very simple adaptation, if you have any experience in virtualization."
"The solution allows us to take advantage of our physical environment."
"The solution's technical support is the best."
"It is a very stable product. We have not had any issues with Hyper-V crashing itself."
"The restore function of the virtual server is valuable to me."
"The features that I have found most valuable include its HA facility, viability, robustness, flexibility, it's time to go live is very short, and it has a friendly user interface."
"It has been stable so far."
"SRM capabilities for replication have been proven reliable and very useful for our organization."
"The pricing is pretty good."
"It has a single pane of glass and you don't have to jump around various toolsets."
"Nutanix Acropolis AOS is stable. We didn't receive any concerns regarding any problems, The customers have no concerns about the reliability."
"I definitely find the reduced power consumption very valuable. Another aspect I really like, when one compares Citrix to VMware, is the interface where you talk directly to your VM from the present software."
"One of the most valuable features is how well this solution performs. It's stable, aside from some patch issues, but it's great from a virtualization and scalability perspective."
"I am using this solution with E-Notes. I heard that there will be future improvements in integration of the E-notes systems. This would be very helpful."
"Hyper-V doesn't have a lot of features and is limited compared to other virtualization software."
"The pricing and technical support can be improved."
"Improvements could be made to the configuration of the solution."
"There is a hard limitation of 20 gigs per file with Dropbox, so you've got to overcome that by chunking the zip files into something smaller and manageable."
"Traditional architecture, such as converged infrastructure, should be done away with"
"The cost and licensing can be improved."
"Some of the interfaces need improvements, like the virtual switch or virtual VLAN interfaces."
"Nutanix Acropolis AOS is new technology in a competitive market. Pricing is too high for a new product and requires better discounts to be able to compete with IBM, Dell EMC, and HP."
"I'd like it to be more API-based."
"In the licensing, it needs to be clear about features because it is not clear whether Flow is integrated or not."
"Some clients find the solution's cost to be too high."
"They should support more VM, which is not currently supported."
"The reporting section of the dashboard could be improved to include more detailed reporting about the servers."
"The documentation could be improved."
"It would be ideal if it was more secure."
More Nutanix Cloud Infrastructure (NCI) Pricing and Cost Advice →
Hyper-V is ranked 3rd in Server Virtualization Software with 134 reviews while Nutanix Cloud Infrastructure (NCI) is ranked 2nd in HCI with 194 reviews. Hyper-V is rated 8.0, while Nutanix Cloud Infrastructure (NCI) is rated 8.6. The top reviewer of Hyper-V writes "It's a low-cost solution that enabled us to shrink everything down into a single server ". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Nutanix Cloud Infrastructure (NCI) writes "A powerful solution with easy deployment, upgrades, and management". Hyper-V is most compared with VMware vSphere, VMware Workstation, Proxmox VE, Oracle VM VirtualBox and Oracle VM, whereas Nutanix Cloud Infrastructure (NCI) is most compared with VMware vSAN, VxRail, HPE SimpliVity, VMware vSphere and Dell PowerFlex.
We monitor all Server Virtualization Software reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.