Hyper-V and Nutanix AHV Virtualization are leading solutions in the virtualization category, offering robust platforms for organizations. User reviews suggest Hyper-V has a slight advantage due to its cost-effectiveness and deep integration with Windows ecosystems, while Nutanix AHV is praised for its seamless integration within its own ecosystem.
Features: Hyper-V is recognized for strong ROI, thanks to its inclusion with Windows Server and tools like dynamic memory, live migration, and live storage migration. It integrates well within Microsoft's ecosystem, offering scalability and comprehensive management features. Nutanix AHV complements the Nutanix infrastructure, providing a license-free hypervisor with inherent high availability and disaster recovery features, making it suitable for environments already investing in Nutanix appliances.
Room for Improvement: Hyper-V could improve its user management tools and enhance user-friendliness, especially for those with less familiarity outside Microsoft's environment. It also needs better integration across diverse ecosystems and more robust backup functionalities. Nutanix AHV requires better support for non-Nutanix environments and broader external system compatibility, along with UI enhancements to improve user experience.
Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Hyper-V is noted for straightforward on-premises deployments and benefits from Microsoft's broad support network, though support quality can vary. Nutanix AHV is praised for easy deployment within Nutanix environments and offers strong support backed by Nutanix’s resources. Both could enhance their deployment documentation and consistency in support experiences.
Pricing and ROI: Hyper-V offers exceptional cost savings due to its integration with Windows Server, making it a budget-friendly option, especially for Microsoft-centric organizations. Nutanix AHV eliminates hypervisor licensing fees, reducing costs for users with Nutanix infrastructure. While hardware investments in Nutanix can be high, the overall solution offers substantial ROI through robust features and reduced overhead.
Technical support from Microsoft is excellent, rated ten out of ten.
The technical support for Hyper-V is excellent
The technical support is very good
Their engineers are excellent and provide great supportability.
They provide prompt and quality responses.
The scalability of Hyper-V is great; I would rate it nine out of ten.
Hyper V can support over two hundred virtual processors and around 12 TB of memory.
We can scale our systems easily without any downtime, making it a highly effective solution for dynamic environments.
Nutanix AHV Virtualization is very scalable; however, I might be underutilizing its capabilities.
Automation is unavailable, and reporting is difficult.
Frequent Windows updates can impact stability compared to VMware ESXi.
The solution is very stable.
Issues such as patch delays and the OVF format challenge affect its stability rating.
I would give the stability a seven out of ten at the moment, primarily due to the issues I've had with updates.
Hyper-V could be improved by implementing the same set of features that other tools provide.
Hyper-V should ensure the features of VMware are covered within its platform.
Hyper-V should improve features such as Quality of Service enhancements and VLAN management.
This delay in patching creates risk, especially for government projects that require timely updates.
These menus often show options like host, memory, and disk, however, they fail to provide insight into what's happening.
Using Lenovo hardware seems problematic with Nutanix AHV Virtualization, which demands careful consideration during updates.
Hyper-V is completely free and requires no licensing fee.
Until 2019, Hyper-V was a cost-effective solution because it was available as a free product.
Hyper-V's licensing costs are lower compared to VMware, making it cost-effective for smaller workloads.
This has been advantageous as it does not require additional licensing costs for the hypervisor, contributing to overall cost savings.
Other solutions like Citrix and VMware have seen a significant price increase, whereas Nutanix hasn't increased as dramatically.
The pricing was reasonable compared to other competitors, though the storage was expensive.
It is completely free, which is a significant advantage.
I find the quick provision feature in Hyper-V to be extremely helpful.
The most valuable features of Hyper-V include high availability and management for virtual machine management.
It is easier to manage than VMware in some ways, providing a good level of interaction.
The technology behind the backups is very efficient, enabling a reliable virtual environment.
Hyper-V is a hardware virtualization tool that allows users to create virtual computer environments with multiple operating systems on a single physical server. Each virtual machine has computer parts, such as memory, processor, storage, and networking, and acts like a standard computer - running its own operating system and software programs. Each component of the virtual machine can be configured to meet your specific requirements.
Hyper-V creates a cost-effective, stable, and productive server virtualization environment by running multiple operating systems, such as Windows, Linux, and more, in parallel on one machine or server. Each virtual machine runs in its own isolated space, which means you can run many virtual machines simultaneously but independently of each other. This helps prevent problems such as a crash affecting the other workloads and enables different users to separately access various systems.
Benefits of Hyper-V
Hyper-V key features:.
Reviews from Real Users
Hyper-V stands out among its competitors for a number of reasons. Several major ones are its flexibility, its replication capabilities, and the fact that its virtual machines utilize a small amount of resources..
Liam L., the owner of a tech services company, writes, “It is actually very low on resources. It doesn't use many resources. It is also very easy to tailor. You can change things like the amount of memory and storage on the fly. It is very stable and reliable. I like its replication feature, which is very good. It is also very easy to move the virtual machines across push servers without any difficulty. Its performance is also very good. Now with this pandemic, a lot of workers are working from home. A lot of workers have been using laptops as their desktop computers, and they would remote into a virtual PC. There is no difficulty, and they can't tell the difference between this and the real one. It is much easier to manage.”
Kevin E. an IT director at Homeland Technology Group, LLC, notes, “We've probably seen a 50 percent speed increase on our SQL server. Hyper-V has also significantly reduced our downtimes with faster boot-up and reboot. If we have to reboot a server, there is maybe two or three minutes of downtime. When we were on a bare-metal server, it could be five to ten minutes due to the total boot time.”
We monitor all Server Virtualization Software reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
