Hyper-V and Nutanix AHV are key players in the virtualization software market, each offering distinct advantages for specific use cases. Hyper-V appears to have the upper hand in cost-effectiveness for Microsoft-centric environments, while Nutanix AHV is favored for its seamless management and integration capabilities.
Features: Hyper-V stands out with dynamic memory management, integration with Windows environments, and support for Live Migration. Its tight integration with Microsoft systems makes it ideal for enterprises already using Microsoft's solutions. Nutanix AHV provides seamless convergence of storage and compute, a user-friendly interface, and Prism management for effective data protection and automation, making it optimal for ease of management and straightforward integration.
Room for Improvement: Hyper-V faces issues with high licensing costs and complex management, and struggles to integrate well outside of Windows ecosystems. Nutanix AHV could benefit from enhancements in orchestration and automation as well as improved third-party system integration. Additionally, it is working to enhance Red Hat compatibility and cloud integration, and aims to improve technical support response times.
Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Both solutions support flexible deployment across on-premises, hybrid, and cloud environments. Hyper-V offers good integration within Microsoft-driven environments, though its support quality can vary. Nutanix AHV shines in deployment simplicity through Prism Central, offering intuitive control but faces average-rated technical support due to occasional slow responses.
Pricing and ROI: Hyper-V provides a cost-effective solution, especially for businesses already investing in Microsoft Windows Server, delivering significant ROI via reduced server and energy costs without additional licensing needs. Nutanix AHV offers a competitive cost model, eliminating hypervisor fees for appealing long-term ROI, despite higher initial expenses offset by cost-saving integrated solutions.
You need only one physical server that can host several virtualized servers within the same physical server instead of having multiple physical servers.
We find a 100% return on investment with Nutanix AHV Virtualization, so there's no question about it.
Technical support from Microsoft is excellent, rated ten out of ten.
The technical support for Hyper-V is excellent
The technical support is very good
Their engineers are excellent and provide great supportability.
They provide prompt and quality responses.
We are getting the correct support personnel, who help us sort out our issues, so the support is very nice.
Hyper V can support over two hundred virtual processors and around 12 TB of memory.
The scalability of Hyper-V is great; I would rate it nine out of ten.
We can scale our systems easily without any downtime, making it a highly effective solution for dynamic environments.
Nutanix AHV Virtualization is very scalable; however, I might be underutilizing its capabilities.
Nutanix AHV Virtualization is very much scalable, and we can scale up to 32 nodes easily, which is a huge size.
Automation is unavailable, and reporting is difficult.
Frequent Windows updates can impact stability compared to VMware ESXi.
The solution is very stable.
Issues such as patch delays and the OVF format challenge affect its stability rating.
Upgrades and updates occur without any downtime, so it is 100% stable.
Hyper-V should ensure the features of VMware are covered within its platform.
Hyper-V could be improved by implementing the same set of features that other tools provide.
In future updates, I would like to see improvements in reporting and a resolution to some security weaknesses.
This delay in patching creates risk, especially for government projects that require timely updates.
These menus often show options like host, memory, and disk, however, they fail to provide insight into what's happening.
Using Lenovo hardware seems problematic with Nutanix AHV Virtualization, which demands careful consideration during updates.
Hyper-V is completely free and requires no licensing fee.
Hyper-V's licensing costs are lower compared to VMware, making it cost-effective for smaller workloads.
Until 2019, Hyper-V was a cost-effective solution because it was available as a free product.
This has been advantageous as it does not require additional licensing costs for the hypervisor, contributing to overall cost savings.
Other solutions like Citrix and VMware have seen a significant price increase, whereas Nutanix hasn't increased as dramatically.
The pricing was reasonable compared to other competitors, though the storage was expensive.
It is completely free, which is a significant advantage.
I have seen return on investment with Hyper-V because it is both time-saving and cost-effective.
It offers the stability needed for non-enterprise data centers and has improved over time.
It is easier to manage than VMware in some ways, providing a good level of interaction.
Using Nutanix AHV Virtualization in a single management pane is very important to me, as it allows us to see everything related to our hardware, software, servers, and VMs from one console.
The technology behind the backups is very efficient, enabling a reliable virtual environment.
| Product | Market Share (%) |
|---|---|
| Hyper-V | 15.2% |
| Nutanix AHV Virtualization | 7.6% |
| Other | 77.2% |
| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 68 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 37 |
| Large Enterprise | 46 |
| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 20 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 15 |
| Large Enterprise | 23 |
Hyper-V is a hardware virtualization tool that allows users to create virtual computer environments with multiple operating systems on a single physical server. Each virtual machine has computer parts, such as memory, processor, storage, and networking, and acts like a standard computer - running its own operating system and software programs. Each component of the virtual machine can be configured to meet your specific requirements.
Hyper-V creates a cost-effective, stable, and productive server virtualization environment by running multiple operating systems, such as Windows, Linux, and more, in parallel on one machine or server. Each virtual machine runs in its own isolated space, which means you can run many virtual machines simultaneously but independently of each other. This helps prevent problems such as a crash affecting the other workloads and enables different users to separately access various systems.
Benefits of Hyper-V
Hyper-V key features:.
Reviews from Real Users
Hyper-V stands out among its competitors for a number of reasons. Several major ones are its flexibility, its replication capabilities, and the fact that its virtual machines utilize a small amount of resources..
Liam L., the owner of a tech services company, writes, “It is actually very low on resources. It doesn't use many resources. It is also very easy to tailor. You can change things like the amount of memory and storage on the fly. It is very stable and reliable. I like its replication feature, which is very good. It is also very easy to move the virtual machines across push servers without any difficulty. Its performance is also very good. Now with this pandemic, a lot of workers are working from home. A lot of workers have been using laptops as their desktop computers, and they would remote into a virtual PC. There is no difficulty, and they can't tell the difference between this and the real one. It is much easier to manage.”
Kevin E. an IT director at Homeland Technology Group, LLC, notes, “We've probably seen a 50 percent speed increase on our SQL server. Hyper-V has also significantly reduced our downtimes with faster boot-up and reboot. If we have to reboot a server, there is maybe two or three minutes of downtime. When we were on a bare-metal server, it could be five to ten minutes due to the total boot time.”
We monitor all Server Virtualization Software reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
