We performed a comparison between Hyper-V and KVM based on our users’ reviews in four categories. After reading all of the collected data, you can find our conclusion below
Comparison Results: Hyper-V is the clear winner in this comparison it is easy to install, robust and high performing. Hyper-V, as a Microsoft product, also offers stable and ongoing customer support.
"For me, the setup of Hyper-V was an easy process, which took only one hour from start to finish."
"My understanding is it's easy to set up."
"The restore function of the virtual server is valuable to me."
"It is an affordable platform."
"The virtualization aspect of the solution functions similar to VMware is one of its most valuable features…It is a stable product."
"The solution is stable."
"I like the functionality."
"The solution is very user-friendly."
"It is an easily scalable solution."
"It offers a high-availability environment."
"The most helpful aspect of KVM is the fact that the interface is so minimal. It includes just what you need to set up the VMs and manage them, and it's very simple to do so."
"I have found KVM to be scalable."
"The most valuable feature is hypervisor. I can host at the same time different operating systems in Linux Windows."
"Documentation and problem-solving troubleshooting are the most valuable features. Performance (when fine-tuned and with "special" HW) is awesome, equal to or more than other enterprise closed-source solutions."
"The initial setup was very easy."
"The product's scalability is good...It's a very stable product."
"Hyper-V doesn't have a lot of features and is limited compared to other virtualization software."
"The biggest problem with Hyper-V is that the virtual machines are mostly running on top of the Windows Server, so we often need to reboot the machine and virtual machines when updating the host level. That's why we prefer VMware. It's much easier to patch the host. Also, Hyper-V has security vulnerabilities. It's easy to attack and compromise the host."
"Hyper-V requires improvement with manageability."
"The solution should improve its native integration with other public cloud solutions."
"The weakness of Hyper-V is in its interaction with iSCSI protocols."
"The management of Hyper-V could improve, there is a lot to improve in that area."
"Hyper-V could improve the management tools."
"The only negative thing I heard was that the baseline price is very, very attractive relative to VMware, however, the vCenter counterpart, the thing that brings it all together, is quite pricey."
"KVM is very difficult to manage and run on daily operations."
"The speed is around thirty percent slower than another competitor. This would be something to work on."
"In KVM, snapshots and cloning are areas where there could be a little more sophistication, like VMware."
"The grid interface of KVM needs improvement. It could be more beautiful, especially when compared to VMware."
"The main drawback in the solution is probably disaster recovery."
"We are not getting good support from KVM, and it is not that user-friendly."
"The networking with wireless devices needs improvement."
"One problem I have is that it's not very scalable when it comes to resizing the VM disk dimensions. For example, if you have initially set a virtual drive to 10 GB and you want to upgrade it to 15 GB, it's not that easy."
Hyper-V is ranked 3rd in Server Virtualization Software with 31 reviews while KVM is ranked 4th in Server Virtualization Software with 12 reviews. Hyper-V is rated 7.6, while KVM is rated 8.4. The top reviewer of Hyper-V writes "It's a low-cost solution that enabled us to shrink everything down into a single server ". On the other hand, the top reviewer of KVM writes "Reduces OpEx and is easy to maintain, along with low memory usage and a minimal interface". Hyper-V is most compared with VMware vSphere, VMware Workstation, Proxmox VE, Oracle VM VirtualBox and Citrix Hypervisor, whereas KVM is most compared with Proxmox VE, Oracle VM VirtualBox, VMware Workstation, Oracle VM and VMware vSphere. See our Hyper-V vs. KVM report.
See our list of best Server Virtualization Software vendors.
We monitor all Server Virtualization Software reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.