

Hyper-V and KVM compete in the virtualization domain, each offering distinct advantages. Based on user reviews, KVM seems to have the upper hand due to its open-source flexibility and lack of licensing fees, appealing to organizations focused on cost-effectiveness.
Features: Hyper-V excels with live migration, Hyper-V Replica, and dynamic memory allocation, integrating seamlessly within the Windows ecosystem. It supports numerous virtual machines per host, benefiting from VDI technology. Hyper-V is known for its robust virtual networking support, further enhancing resource utilization. KVM is praised for superior real-time performance, strong security features, and open-source adaptability. It integrates well with Linux, supporting advanced customization and high scalability, which is highly valued in tech-driven environments seeking flexible solutions.
Room for Improvement: Hyper-V faces challenges with complex licensing costs and higher resource consumption. Users note issues with setup and network configurations, especially regarding non-Windows platforms. KVM receives critiques for its initial configuration complexity and less refined management tools compared to competitors like VMware. Users express a need for better documentation and integration with desktop virtualization solutions, and KVM's support could be improved.
Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Hyper-V benefits from deep Microsoft integration, making it favorable for hybrid and on-premises deployments. Technical support experiences vary, with some regional and complexity concerns noted. KVM is popular in private cloud and on-premises environments, particularly with platforms like Red Hat. The community often aids in overcoming manageability challenges, making it well-suited for tech-savvy teams familiar with Linux.
Pricing and ROI: Hyper-V is highlighted for cost-effectiveness within the Microsoft ecosystem, although licensing complexities can lead to increased costs. Enterprise agreements often offer discounts, enhancing ROI. KVM, with its open-source nature, eliminates licensing fees entirely, appealing to organizations with Linux expertise and those prioritizing low costs. The absence of licensing fees often gives KVM an advantage in environments where open-source compatibility is valued, aligning with organizational fiscal goals.
You need only one physical server that can host several virtualized servers within the same physical server instead of having multiple physical servers.
It saves us money compared to VMware because we still need to pay Microsoft licenses, but in addition to that we need to pay for VMware for virtualization.
KVM definitely saves costs since it is open-source and does not obligate us to pay for licenses as necessary with other virtualization solutions.
Technical support from Microsoft is excellent, rated ten out of ten.
The technical support for Hyper-V is excellent
The technical support is very good
Paid support is also obtainable from companies like Red Hat for more critical issues.
There is a redundancy cost for high availability because data are stored mirroring on two nodes.
Hyper V can support over two hundred virtual processors and around 12 TB of memory.
The scalability of Hyper-V is great; I would rate it nine out of ten.
Automation is unavailable, and reporting is difficult.
We have stable performance, but we see some glitches with some snapshots on Linux boxes in Linux virtual machines.
Frequent Windows updates can impact stability compared to VMware ESXi.
All the actions are manual, and if customization is needed, it is difficult with Hyper-V.
In performance, it is hard to tell what is a weak spot in the solution or in our architecture or hardware.
In future updates, I would like to see improvements in reporting and a resolution to some security weaknesses.
In comparison to VMware, which offers a more balanced set of management features, KVM could improve in terms of user-friendly tooling.
Hyper-V is completely free and requires no licensing fee.
I think regarding price and license for Hyper-V, it is affordable.
Until 2019, Hyper-V was a cost-effective solution because it was available as a free product.
Compared to VMware and Microsoft, KVM offers better pricing and licensing options.
It is completely free, which is a significant advantage.
I have seen return on investment with Hyper-V because it is both time-saving and cost-effective.
We switched to Hyper-V because it was lower cost than paying for high availability in VMware.
The most valuable feature of KVM is its superior real-time performance, which results in lower latency compared to alternatives like VMware and Microsoft.
| Product | Market Share (%) |
|---|---|
| Hyper-V | 18.2% |
| KVM | 8.5% |
| Other | 73.3% |

| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 70 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 37 |
| Large Enterprise | 46 |
| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 22 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 9 |
| Large Enterprise | 14 |
Hyper-V is a hardware virtualization tool that allows users to create virtual computer environments with multiple operating systems on a single physical server. Each virtual machine has computer parts, such as memory, processor, storage, and networking, and acts like a standard computer - running its own operating system and software programs. Each component of the virtual machine can be configured to meet your specific requirements.
Hyper-V creates a cost-effective, stable, and productive server virtualization environment by running multiple operating systems, such as Windows, Linux, and more, in parallel on one machine or server. Each virtual machine runs in its own isolated space, which means you can run many virtual machines simultaneously but independently of each other. This helps prevent problems such as a crash affecting the other workloads and enables different users to separately access various systems.
Benefits of Hyper-V
Hyper-V key features:.
Reviews from Real Users
Hyper-V stands out among its competitors for a number of reasons. Several major ones are its flexibility, its replication capabilities, and the fact that its virtual machines utilize a small amount of resources..
Liam L., the owner of a tech services company, writes, “It is actually very low on resources. It doesn't use many resources. It is also very easy to tailor. You can change things like the amount of memory and storage on the fly. It is very stable and reliable. I like its replication feature, which is very good. It is also very easy to move the virtual machines across push servers without any difficulty. Its performance is also very good. Now with this pandemic, a lot of workers are working from home. A lot of workers have been using laptops as their desktop computers, and they would remote into a virtual PC. There is no difficulty, and they can't tell the difference between this and the real one. It is much easier to manage.”
Kevin E. an IT director at Homeland Technology Group, LLC, notes, “We've probably seen a 50 percent speed increase on our SQL server. Hyper-V has also significantly reduced our downtimes with faster boot-up and reboot. If we have to reboot a server, there is maybe two or three minutes of downtime. When we were on a bare-metal server, it could be five to ten minutes due to the total boot time.”
KVM stands for Kernel-based Virtual Machine, which is an open-source virtualization technology that is embedded in Linux. KVM allows users to seamlessly transform their Linux system into a hypervisor that, in turn, will enable a host machine to run numerous, isolated virtual environments or virtual machines (VMs).
KVM is part of Linux. Users with Linux 2.6.20 or newer already have KVM. As KVM is already a component of the current Linux code, it automatically improves with every new Linux fix, feature, or upgrade. So KVM users are always current and up to date.
KVM automatically transforms Linux to a type -1 (bare-metal) hypervisor. All hypervisors need operating system components, such as a process scheduler, I/O stack, device drivers, memory manager, and more, to run a VM. KVM already has these components embedded, as it is part of the Linux kernel. Each VM is generated as a basic Linux proces,s which is maintained by the standard Linux scheduler, with dedicated hardware such as a graphics adapter, memory, disks, network card, and CPUs.
KVM Key Features:
KVM has many valuable key features. Some of its most useful features include:
Reviews from Real Users
“The most helpful aspect of KVM is the fact that the interface is so minimal. It includes just what you need to set up the VMs and manage them, and it's very simple to do so. KVM, as a native virtualization solution, is a complete and fully adequate system for small businesses that need to reduce costs, and also to make maintenance easier. “ - Georges E., Business Engineer and Consultant at All-Tech
“The most valuable feature of KVM is the hypervisor environment and how we can configure it with ease. Additionally, the interface is intuitive.” Sonu S., Senior Solution Architect at Micro Focus
We monitor all Server Virtualization Software reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.