"We've found the solution to be quite stable."
"The solution is very user-friendly and easy to use."
"The solution is easy to set up."
"The solution offers very good value for money."
"You can add a lot of features, such as cloud, integration with IoT, etc. They have a lot of options available but the top feature is the performance."
"Installation is easy."
"This solution is very simple and the interface is user-friendly."
"It is based on 802.11ax, which is a new technology. There are several valuable things, such as its speed and mobility. There are options for self-organizing networking so that it can perform operations and maintain itself. Its three interfaces are very good and user friendly."
"The cost is the most valuable aspect of this solution."
"If you compare wired versus wireless, it's convenient. You don't need to have one place for connectivity. You can move around and it's easier. Sometimes it's a hassle to work with wires, which is why wireless is so convenient."
"Has an extremely good feature set."
"The triangulation feature can be used to determine where a person is in relation to the access point."
"This solution has issues with bugs and instability."
"As such, there are no problems. It has been good. There were some issues with the network design, but that is not specifically related to the product. We had to make some improvements in the network design. The product as such is fine, and there are no big issues. We are using the latest version having most of the features available in the industry, so the specs are very high. If something new comes up new in the industry, it needs to be incorporated into the product."
"The scalability could be better."
"The scalability could be a bit better."
"While I am fine with the current licensing price, I would appreciate it to be more cost-effective."
"The manageability could be improved."
"The security of the solution could be better in the future."
"They should actually first test the equipment thoroughly and then launch it. Sometimes, things come out too soon, before they are ready."
"The user experience should be improved. It's not user-friendly."
"The inter-functionality with other vendors was a negative for us."
"There seems to be different versions of standards used in the wireless access points. In the future, it would be helpful if the solution could come up with some kind of universal standard for all devices and all access points."
Huawei Wireless is ranked 7th in Wireless LAN with 11 reviews while Mist Access Points is ranked 17th in Wireless LAN with 4 reviews. Huawei Wireless is rated 8.0, while Mist Access Points is rated 5.8. The top reviewer of Huawei Wireless writes "It has a very good price and provides value for money". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Mist Access Points writes "Fast, with good availability and good management". Huawei Wireless is most compared with D-Link Wireless, Aruba Wireless, Cisco Wireless and Ubiquiti WLAN, whereas Mist Access Points is most compared with Cisco Meraki Wireless LAN, Aruba Wireless, Cisco Wireless, Ruckus Wireless and Juniper WLC Series. See our Huawei Wireless vs. Mist Access Points report.
See our list of best Wireless LAN vendors.
We monitor all Wireless LAN reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
