We performed a comparison between HPE OneView and Splunk Enterprise Security based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Zabbix, Datadog, Auvik and others in IT Infrastructure Monitoring."The easy user interface was what I found most valuable in HPE OneView. For example, if I wanted to know the infrastructure status or I needed to send in any change commands, HPE OneView had simple buttons."
"OneView provides a single console, which is manageable without physical access."
"Gives the business interfaces to view real-time pictures of IT business services."
"Deploys faster new virtual services."
"The template management makes the deployment of the firmware updates much faster."
"It gives us a view of all our servers, which we did not have before in real-time."
"The hypervisor and cluster profiles make it easy to integrate with VMware."
"The solution's technical support was great...The initial setup of HPE OneView was easy."
"You can check up on security from the dashboards."
"Aggregation searches have reduced time and difficulty of identifying trends and conditions which need to reviewed."
"Splunk Enterprise Security's dashboards are a key asset."
"The completeness of the solution is what we like the most."
"Splunk has facilitated the correlation of information security logs to look for incidents which could cause damage to the company's infrastructure, as well as financial losses from leaks."
"It's better than IBM, in my opinion, because it's an independent entity."
"It is the best tool if you have a complex environment or if data ingestion is too huge."
"The data representation options in the dashboards are excellent."
"The solution could add storage, integration services, and end-to-end support for Cisco switches or other competitor products."
"Integration could be improved. Sometimes OneView doesn't identify physical hardware."
"One thing which is missing is that you can't actually log a support call yourself."
"I have to chop it up into smaller parts, because I have an installation in Europe and it covers the whole world. That is not so good. They need to be more localized, so I am going to chop it up into smaller bits."
"We ran into a couple of issues here and there with the baselines for the firmware and not having enough space on the appliance itself to be able to have more than two baselines."
"I had some minor difficulties with upgrading, but the solution still works fine."
"They can improve reporting and provide more customized reports. Currently, reporting is a bit limited. It can be complex to learn and manage for beginners. Because of my experience, I find it comfortable to manage, which might not be the case with beginners. It would be good if they can make it a little bit easier to understand. They can provide a more graphical view of connectivity and other things. Their technical support can also be improved."
"I think HPE could make more user-friendly interfaces, exclude Java and move to an HTML5 platform, make more detailed documentation, and lower the price."
"We were inundated with the amount of alerts and alarms that we could get out of it. It is also a resource hog and we didn't have the resources to support it on-prem so we're taking it offline now."
"Configuring a few apps is complex, not straightforward."
"It needs more formatting control without having to be an admin."
"The tool itself is very difficult to configure. It's great for its number of inputs, for the different types of systems devices, and things that it could collect information from. To actually make good use of it, you need a fairly dedicated team of people that have some reasonably good programming or modeling skills to be able to do the things that you need to do with it. Whereas a lot of the other tools are better packaged for that, and so require a lot less training and a lot less dedication."
"I would like to see an updated dashboard. The dashboard is a little out-of-date. It could be made prettier."
"The threat detection system has room for improvement."
"It could be more user friendly, in terms of the end-user experience."
"I think the machine learning should be emphasized. Now, it's really important to analyze Big Data, data mining. A SIEM solution, like Splunk, needs an improved data mining solution, artificial intelligence."
HPE OneView is ranked 17th in IT Infrastructure Monitoring with 80 reviews while Splunk Enterprise Security is ranked 2nd in Security Information and Event Management (SIEM) with 227 reviews. HPE OneView is rated 8.0, while Splunk Enterprise Security is rated 8.4. The top reviewer of HPE OneView writes "Provides firmware compliance and the ability to connect to iPO". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Splunk Enterprise Security writes "It has a drag-and-drop interface, so you don't need to know SQL or Java to construct a query ". HPE OneView is most compared with Cisco Intersight, Dell CloudIQ, Zabbix, SolarWinds NPM and Cisco UCS Manager, whereas Splunk Enterprise Security is most compared with Wazuh, Dynatrace, IBM Security QRadar, Microsoft Sentinel and Elastic Security.
We monitor all IT Infrastructure Monitoring reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
