HPE Moonshot and IBM Power Systems are two prominent players in the server solutions category. Reviews indicate that while HPE Moonshot offers competitive pricing and support, IBM Power Systems is noted for its feature richness, providing justification for its higher cost.
Features: HPE Moonshot is recognized for energy efficiency, dense computing capabilities, and its compact form factor, making it attractive for space-conscious environments. IBM Power Systems stands out with robust scalability, superior performance in analytics workloads, and advanced processing power, which are particularly beneficial for large enterprises.
Room for Improvement: HPE Moonshot users suggest enhancements in network configuration flexibility, improved storage options, and expanded software compatibility. Users of IBM Power Systems call for better virtualization support, cost optimization strategies, and a more user-friendly interface.
Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: HPE Moonshot is praised for its straightforward deployment process and reliable customer service, making it suitable for enterprises focusing on simplicity and efficiency. IBM Power Systems requires a steeper learning curve but is supported by commendable customer service and comprehensive documentation to assist complex environment setups.
Pricing and ROI: HPE Moonshot is seen as offering an appealing initial cost and quick ROI, particularly in small to mid-scale implementations. IBM Power Systems demands a higher upfront investment but is regarded as delivering greater value over time with long-term ROI benefits and high workload efficiency.
| Product | Market Share (%) |
|---|---|
| IBM Power Systems | 8.7% |
| HPE Moonshot | 0.8% |
| Other | 90.5% |
| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 17 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 18 |
| Large Enterprise | 42 |
We monitor all Rack Servers reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
