HPE Intelligent Management Center vs NetScaler comparison

HPE Intelligent Management ...

Read 107 NetScaler reviews

6,935 Views
347 Comparison Views

91% willing to recommend

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Nov 30, 2025

NetScaler and HPE Intelligent Management Center are both vital in the realm of network management, focusing on enhancing operational efficiency and performance. Data indicates that HPE Intelligent Management Center holds a slight advantage in terms of comprehensive features, while NetScaler is preferred for its cost-effectiveness and consistent customer support.

Features: NetScaler offers advanced load balancing, SSL VPNs, and MAS central management, making it ideal for application delivery and security. In contrast, HPE Intelligent Management Center provides broad infrastructure monitoring, robust interface and ease of use, and extensive network device support including multiple vendor compatibility.

Room for Improvement: NetScaler could benefit from simplifying its integration process further, enhancing its documentation clarity, and improving its initial setup interface. HPE Intelligent Management Center might enhance its automation capabilities, reduce its complexity in report customization, and offer more intuitive scheduling for network task management.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: NetScaler is praised for its straightforward deployment process and solid customer service support, making it convenient for enterprises starting out. HPE Intelligent Management Center, while offering comprehensive support, requires a more complex deployment process that may need significant time investment from IT teams.

Pricing and ROI: NetScaler is valued for its lower initial costs and rapid return on investment, which is appealing for budget-sensitive enterprises. HPE Intelligent Management Center, whilst requiring a higher upfront financial outlay, offers long-term value with its extensive feature set and ability to manage diverse network environments comprehensively, often seen as justifying its higher cost for larger enterprises focused on detailed network insights.

To learn more, read our detailed HPE Intelligent Management Center vs. NetScaler Report (Updated: December 2025).

HPE Intelligent Management Center vs. NetScaler

December 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 881,082 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

HPE Intelligent Management ...

Ranking in Network Management Applications

8th

Average Rating

7.2

Reviews Sentiment

7.1

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

NetScaler

Ranking in Network Management Applications

4th

Average Rating

8.4

Reviews Sentiment

7.0

Number of Reviews

107

Ranking in other categories

Application Delivery Controllers (ADC) (1st), Web Application Firewall (WAF) (10th)

Mindshare comparison

As of January 2026, in the Network Management Applications category, the mindshare of HPE Intelligent Management Center is 4.6%, down from 5.7% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of NetScaler is 2.4%, up from 1.2% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Network Management Applications Market Share Distribution
Product	Market Share (%)
NetScaler	2.4%
HPE Intelligent Management Center	4.6%
Other	93.0%

Network Management Applications

Featured Reviews

Muhammad_Faisal

Manager ITSM at Lucky Cement Limited

Achieve seamless network and link monitoring with comprehensive device management

The most valuable function is that the IMC takes an entire backup of my network devices, and I can also redeploy them. The really beneficial feature is the link monitoring. I had checked Check Point's product, however, my requirements are better fulfilled by IMC. The main feature is that IMC automatically configures the device for my use. I have over 200 features in my network, and IMC manages the complete environment. Automation is good, but I mainly use it for monitoring. I am too satisfied with this product.

Read full review

Letarik Terefe

Information Technology Division Director at Ethiopian Roads Administration

Offers better visibility into user sessions compared to other solutions

Improvements are needed to address the issue of machines becoming unregistered, ensuring stability for end users. Troubleshooting with Citrix support can be challenging, so clearer diagnostics would be beneficial. As for global server load balancing, it works well on-premises, depending on user volume and service stability. Overall, it's satisfactory for us.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The most valuable function is that the IMC takes an entire backup of my network devices, and I can also redeploy them."

"The most valuable feature is the interface and its ease of use."

"One of the notable advantages is its ability to provide quick responses, especially in critical situations."

"The most useful feature is infrastructure monitoring including switches and servers."

"It's a very complete product with a lot of functionality."

"Enables a Web service that offers persistent client-server connections, IP restriction, URL rewrite (such as remove "/assets/" path from client-side URL path), and cache for CSS or JS files... You can easily use the GUI to set up all these requirements on the same network device within 20-30 minutes. (If you do the same steps on CLI, it might take less time.)"

"Just one solution can handle thousands of users... So, it is a very convenient tool to use."

"Most of the functions are user-friendly and great."

"The solution is easy to work with and manage."

"This solution increases the backend network service performance, which is one of the things that we like the most."

"NetScaler Gateway: Why? Availability/Security: We delivered more than 200 applications thru Xenapp. This feature give us the possibility to deliver the applications anywhere. Currently, 30% of access is made through our NetScaler Gateway (Internet connections)."

"Very stable."

"Provides resiliency for applications that reside on servers, as well as connectivity to remote applications."

More NetScaler pros

Cons

"I face the issue with the integration with links on Fortinet Firewall."

"The integration with other network devices needs improvement."

"One notable deficiency is the lack of online support for the product."

"I would like to see additional modules included."

"HPE Intelligent Management Center is a bit slow."

"Citrix ADC can improve if it provides a more user-friendly interface and clear working protocols. Citrix is not working with classic RFC, it is working with Citrix RFC, which is not common in the world. If engineers of Citrix can provide us with more information on working with the classic IP networks it would be a benefit."

"The WAF component needs to be simplified so that it is easier to use."

"The solution should be able to scale more effectively than it does."

"They need to make the solution a little more familiar with easy study guides, learning videos, etc."

"Does not include security. A web application firewall would be a nice addition."

"In terms of what could be improved, I would say the user interface because sometimes it can be complicated."

"The solution can improve their support and send tickets directly to a Citrix ADC engineer in order to avoid having to escalate each support call."

"Technical support could be improved."

More NetScaler cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"There are licensing costs and they are quite expensive."

"The price of this solution is not at all cheap, but it's reasonable compared to SolarWinds."

"I do not have any experience with the pricing of the product."

"On a scale from one to ten, where one is cheap, and ten is expensive, I rate the solution's pricing an eight or nine out of ten."

"When compared to other solutions, the cost is high."

"Citrix ADC could improve the price and make it less expensive, other competitors have a better prices. This would allow Citrix ADC to keep dominating the market."

"The pricing could be lower."

"We have all the features and functions of Citrix because we have a premium license."

"In Turkey, everything is good, but it seems expensive for us due to the currency exchange. I don't have a specific rating scale, but if I had to rate the price, I would say it's around a six out of ten."

"The tool is cheap."

More NetScaler pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Network Management Applications solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

881,082 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Computer Software Company

14%

Government

12%

Manufacturing Company

Educational Organization

Computer Software Company

13%

Government

Manufacturing Company

Financial Services Firm

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	3
Midsize Enterprise	1
Large Enterprise	3

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	45
Midsize Enterprise	23
Large Enterprise	57

Questions from the Community

What needs improvement with HPE Intelligent Management Center?

I face the issue with the integration with links on Fortinet Firewall. This will be sorted out with the help of IMC, and now I have a modem dialing as per my needs.

What is your primary use case for HPE Intelligent Management Center?

I am using this solution for network monitoring, links monitoring, and complete monitoring of my infrastructure. I also deploy FortiVAF, FortiAnalyzer, and FortiManager as part of a complete securi...

What advice do you have for others considering HPE Intelligent Management Center?

I rate the overall solution nine out of ten.

What do you like most about Citrix ADC?

The most valuable feature for us is the application firewalling in Citrix NetScaler, ensuring only valid traffic enters our environment.

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Citrix ADC?

After deployment, Citrix Netscaler shifted to a subscription-based license scheme for support, which is slightly more expensive.

What needs improvement with Citrix ADC?

Citrix NetScaler is a robust product, but mastering it requires significant learning and training due to its complexity. While it could be easier to manage, it is like transitioning from driving a ...

Cisco DNA Center vs HPE Intelligent Management Center

Comparisons

Compared 28% of the time

Aruba Airwave vs HPE Intelligent Management Center

Compared 14% of the time

H3C intelligent Management Center vs HPE Intelligent Management Center

Compared 9% of the time

Fortinet FortiManager vs HPE Intelligent Management Center

Compared 8% of the time

Huawei eSight vs HPE Intelligent Management Center

Compared 8% of the time

More HPE Intelligent Management Center Competitors

Fortinet FortiADC vs NetScaler

Compared 9% of the time

HAProxy vs NetScaler

Compared 8% of the time

F5 BIG-IP Local Traffic Manager (LTM) vs NetScaler

Compared 7% of the time

Microsoft Azure Application Gateway vs NetScaler

Compared 6% of the time

A10 Networks Thunder ADC vs NetScaler

Compared 6% of the time

More NetScaler Competitors

Product Reports

Network Management Applications

January 2026

HPE Intelligent Management Center report

Download HPE Intelligent Management Center product report

Download NetScaler product report

January 2026

Also Known As

HPE IMC

Citrix ADC, Citrix NetScaler VPX, NetScaler Console, NetScaler Web Application Firewall, NetScaler VPX - Customer Licensed

Overview

HPE Intelligent Management Center (IMC) is a comprehensive management platform that was built from the ground up to support the Fault, Configuration, Accounting, Performance, Security (FCAPS) model. It provides features and functions that are designed for comprehensive management of the network infrastructure. IMC was designed to provide the following functions:

Supports the ITIL operational center of excellence IT practices model.
Uses a single-pane management paradigm to enable end-to-end business management of IT services

Provides scalability by supporting distributed and hierarchical system architectures, through additional operating system and database support.

Uses an SOA model to provide full resource, service, and user management.
Enables integration of traditionally separate management tools using a modular design.
Enables enterprises to expand their infrastructure management in scale and to seamlessly accommodate new technologies at the same time.

Hewlett Packard Enterprise

NetScaler is an advanced application delivery controller providing load balancing, SSL offloading, and enhanced network performance. Users benefit from its robust security features, seamless Citrix integrations, and cost-effective infrastructure.

Designed to optimize and secure application delivery, NetScaler offers high availability and supports data centers with its load balancing and reverse proxy capabilities. It ensures effective traffic management and provides valuable insights into network health while integrating easily with Citrix products. Users appreciate its centralized management via ADM and flexible deployment options tailored to their infrastructure needs. However, there is room for improvement in its management tools, interface, and documentation, alongside a need for security enhancements and better licensing flexibility.

What are the most important features of NetScaler?

Flexible Deployment: Allows adaptation to different environments and needs.
Load Balancing: Efficiently distributes traffic to enhance performance.
SSL Offloading: Offloads encryption to optimize server performance.
Content Switching: Enables tailored content delivery based on user needs.
Robust Security: Includes firewalling and AAA authentication.
Global Server Load Balancing: Distributes load across multiple locations for high availability.

What benefits should users look for in reviews?

Cost-effectiveness: Delivers an efficient infrastructure without high costs.
Reliable Performance: Ensures consistent delivery and resilience.
High Availability: Maintains network uptime and service quality.
Technical Support: Offers responsive assistance for operational issues.

NetScaler is implemented across sectors like healthcare, finance, and education to guarantee secure remote access, enhance application network management, and support virtual desktops. Its application gateways and VPN access capabilities make it ideal for industries needing secure and efficient connectivity solutions.

Sample Customers

Information Not Available

ABB Schweiz, Aer Lingus, AIDS Healthcare Foundation, Amnet Technology Solutions, Aramex International, Ascenty, Atos, Autodesk