HPE Enterprise Routers vs Juniper MX Series Routers comparison

"Extensive support for cellular range for Wi-Fi technologies"

"It has good scalability."

"HPE routers are easier to manage than any other router I've used."

"The solution's initial setup is straightforward."

"It makes it easy to update the network technology and manage multiple deals, all without needing technical knowledge."

"It is more durable than other products in the market."

"These routers help us to provide high availability to our clusters."

"The flexibility of the MPLS configuration is very good."

"The functionality and stability are great."

"I would say it is very user-friendly."

"The most valuable feature of Juniper MX Series Routers is its exceptional policy management capabilities."

"The most valuable feature is the capacity of the throughput for the firewall."

"I would rate the stability a ten out of ten. We never had any issues."

"The solution is pretty easy to set up after a bit of training."

"On the SRX, the firewall is very easy to configure, especially when you want to filter out traffic."

"Technical support could be better."

"Its customer service could be better for older equipment models."

"The solution is expensive."

"They should work on lowering their prices in Brazil to stay competitive with rivals and offer customers more affordable options."

"I'd like to see more security features, like support for different types of encryptions."

"Better management tools are needed."

"Compatibility with other platforms could be improved."

"Juniper must publish more information about Juniper MX Series Routers."

"Currently, I don't have specific concerns or ideas for improvement. Regarding functionalities, I appreciate the user interface of Juniper Elite. Additionally, I'm exploring the use of Juniper Routers in a Parliament environment, particularly with Baragon, and so far, I find it to be a valuable feature. We're currently facing an issue as we're in the process of building and dealing with the software, specifically transitioning from R2 to RC. It's like when there is an update in the routers, and in the process, there are chances to end up losing some of your settings. The challenge arises because the recommended configurations for RC do not align with our features, necessitating a reevaluation of many features. It would have been more efficient if the initial recommendation had been for RC, avoiding the need to redo our research. This has resulted in a loss of time for us, and we've encountered this situation multiple times."

"The web interface can be improved."

"It is not scalable, unfortunately."

"There are areas for improvement in Juniper EX Series Ethernet Switches. One aspect that could be enhanced is the pricing; many clients acknowledge the quality of Juniper switches but find the pricing challenging, especially when compared to competitors like Huawei. Additionally, from a feature perspective, there's a desire for improved clarity and ease of configuration in Juniper switches. Some users find it difficult to understand and configure certain aspects, necessitating the use of external tools. This complexity, especially for Internet service providers, can be a barrier. Addressing these concerns could further strengthen the position of Juniper switches in the market."

"Automation can also be improved."

"Finding market expertise is hard."

"We'd appreciate it if they had a better GUI. It would be more flexible for the customers that way."

"It is more reasonably priced than other vendors."

"We have to pay for the device and licensing. The support service requires additional costs."

"The solution is more expensive compared to other solutions."

"There is a license for this solution and the price is very competitive. The cost is less expensive than some competitors, such as Cisco. There are additional costs for support licenses."

"The pricing of Juniper MX Series Routers is okay compared to other technologies."

"$300 to $400 is the hardware cost and for licensing cost, it may be around, for support and all, $100 per year."

"I would rate it around a three. While I'm not deeply involved in pricing discussions, I believe it is comparatively more affordable than Cisco."

"An additional license can be purchased for support of a next-generation firewall."

"I would rate the pricing model a seven out of ten, where one is cheap, and ten is expensive. It is not cheap."