HPE Cloud CDN [EOL] vs Imperva Application Security Platform comparison

Why PeerSpot?

Hewlett Packard Enterprise and Imperva are both solutions in the CDN category. Additionally, 100% of Hewlett Packard Enterprise users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 95% of Imperva users who would recommend it.

HPE Cloud CDN [EOL]

Read 2 HPE Cloud CDN [EOL] reviews

100% willing to recommend

Imperva Application Securit...

Read 148 Imperva Application Security Platform reviews

23,984 Views
7,195 Comparison Views

95% willing to recommend

HPE Cloud CDN [EOL]

Imperva Application Securit...

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Sep 17, 2025

Imperva Application Security Platform and HPE Cloud CDN [EOL] are products competing in web security and content delivery. Imperva appears to have an edge due to its advanced security features, while HPE Cloud CDN [EOL] offered strong content delivery solutions during its operational period.

Features: Imperva Application Security Platform provides advanced threat protection, automated security updates, and comprehensive web application security. HPE Cloud CDN [EOL] was known for its efficient global content delivery, seamless integration with web services, and load balancing capabilities.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Imperva offers straightforward deployment and reliable customer support, making setup and issue resolution easier for customers. HPE Cloud CDN [EOL] had a streamlined deployment process but emphasized less on continuous customer support, potentially extending resolution times.

Pricing and ROI: Imperva Application Security Platform represents a valuable investment with a good ROI due to its comprehensive security scope, despite possibly higher initial costs. HPE Cloud CDN [EOL] was more budget-friendly but provided limited security ROI in the long term.

To learn more, read our detailed CDN Report (Updated: October 2026).

Buyer's Guide

CDN

October 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 920,223 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

HPE Cloud CDN [EOL]

Average Rating

8.0

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Imperva Application Securit...

Average Rating

8.6

Reviews Sentiment

6.9

Number of Reviews

148

Ranking in other categories

CDN (2nd), Web Application Firewall (WAF) (1st), Distributed Denial-of-Service (DDoS) Protection (3rd), Bot Management (1st), API Security (1st)

Featured Reviews

it_user567870

Corporate Account Tech Manager at a tech company with 51-200 employees

It's a converged system resulting in fewer complications

It's a converged system; the storage. SAN switch is not required, that is the advantage of it. The interconnectivity is based on a single system. That is value. It means fewer complications and the cost will be reduced Productivity increases, in terms of speed of the application. And, of course,…

Read full review

reviewer2818155

Senior Associate at a tech vendor with 10,001+ employees

Application protection has improved and reporting and dashboards still need refinement

I believe Imperva Application Security Platform should have a more interactive wizard. While the dashboard is good, it could be more eye-catching. Based on my perspective, I recommend modifying the dashboards, especially the main dashboard where I can see the traffic hit count, alerts, and other latest information. In terms of reporting, I find it challenging to create reports; in my earlier days, it was difficult. Over time, I have learned how to create reports, but it should be easier to do so. I have used other tools such as firewalls or SolarWinds, where creating a report is straightforward and does not take much time, unlike in Imperva, where I have to add many elements. Modifications in the integration aspects would also be beneficial.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"Productivity increases, in terms of speed of the application, and of course the price is reduced compared to traditional solutions."

"It speeds up clients' workflow and productivity because deployment is faster, they can test and build applications, build virtual machines, test them, and have them deployed in a much shorter period of time, increasing the efficiency of IT operations and cutting costs because you pay for services only as and when you need them."

"The most valuable aspect of it is that it blocks all types of attacks."

"Provides Anti-DDoS protection, as well as other protections like SQL injection, Cross-Site Scripting, and antiscanner. These types of protection are valuable to the business due to the daily attacks on our portals, and that often cannot be seen without a tool like this."

"I am impressed with the product's scalability, availability, easy management, and security. We were able to integrate the product with Azure and Sentinel."

"It has threat intelligence and we are using Incapsula. With threat intelligence, we can separate HTTP and HTTPS traffic. We can use Incapsula to send all the threat intelligence to the WAF."

"We are using Incapsula as our web application firewall and for DDoS protection, and it performs really well at its job."

"The ease of testing Incapsula and then implementing it into production is one of the most remarkable product experiences in my IT career."

"Imperva makes it easier for us to put everything in code; we use Terraform to deploy our infrastructure."

"An improvement has been to our website: It increases the speed of our response, the capacity of the site, and optimizes the bandwidth."

More Imperva Application Security Platform pros

Cons

"Extend the storage capacity. I think it's capable of only going up to 13TB, but sometimes customers require 30TB of storage."

"There's always room for improvement. Occasionally, there might be false-positive alerts."

"However, I'd like to be able to drill down more into the analytics that Incapsula collects."

"Imperva now offers add-ons to add functionality, but I would like to see these included in the product, even if it would cost more."

"Caching rules are really basic now and lots of space for improvement here."

"The dashboard is not accessible on occasion."

"It would be useful if the solution used more intelligence in attack protection. For example, firewalls are to be dependent on the configuration, but if they could have some data science around it the solution would be even better. The profiling of the traffic, and making decisions surrounding that should be intelligence-based, instead of being based on the configuration of the firewall itself."

"Imperva Web Application Firewall can improve by providing better features, such as improved prevention of zero-day attacks. Additionally, it should include a VR meta-analysis."

"There could be some limitations that from the converged infrastructure perspective: when you want to converge with everything and you want Imperva to get there easily because it's not a cloud component. For example, when you want to build servers and you're using OneView to manage your software-defined networks, implementing Imperva right away is not that simple. But if you're doing just a simple cloud infrastructure with servers in there, you're good to go. Also, we are not able, with Imperva, to block by signatures. Imperva by itself needs to be complemented with another service to do URL filtering."

More Imperva Application Security Platform cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

Information not available

"The tool is expensive."

"It is a very affordable solution."

"Imperva Web Application Firewall price is higher compared to other solutions. However, everything is included in the price."

"There are some licenses that you have to buy to use some features. Its price could be better. Price is always important because, at the end of the day, customers have a budget. If you can meet the budget, you can sell, and if you don't, you cannot sell."

"Although the pricing can be a little high, it is worth the protection and security that it offers."

"It is a very expensive solution. The price is very high. A lot of customers tell us that they would love to use Imperva more. I have some customers who have 50 websites, but they have only 10 websites on Imperva because of the price. They would love to have all their websites running through Imperva, but they can't. They have to choose the more critical websites to protect because the price is very high. It is a very good product, but it is too expensive. If you buy a plan for 20 megabytes and you don't consume all of your 20 megabytes, it is okay, but if you consume more, you are charged for the superior traffic."

"Everybody complains about the price of this solution."

"We sell three-year licenses for Imperva Web Application Firewall to our customers. The price is a little expensive."

More Imperva Application Security Platform pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which CDN solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

920,223 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

No data available

Outsourcing Company

13%

Financial Services Firm

11%

Manufacturing Company

Construction Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	88
Midsize Enterprise	25
Large Enterprise	71

Questions from the Community

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Which Web Application Firewall (WAF) would you recommend? R&S or Imperva?

Imperva is a strong choice, given their security focus and ongoing R&D into the product in areas such as bot management.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Imperva DDoS?

The pricing, setup costs, and licensing of Imperva DDoS are reasonable for the amount of technical capabilities provided. I would rate the pricing of Imperva DDoS as five, where one is very cheap a...

See all answers

What needs improvement with Imperva DDoS?

I would like to see improvements in the pooling of threats and attacks, possibly to enlarge the scale of indicators of compromise. For example, the initiation of an attack on the endpoint level cou...

See all answers

Comparisons

CDN77 vs HPE Cloud CDN [EOL]

Compared 47% of the time

StackPath CDN vs HPE Cloud CDN [EOL]

Compared 23% of the time

Cloudflare vs HPE Cloud CDN [EOL]

Compared 15% of the time

More HPE Cloud CDN [EOL] Competitors

Cloudflare vs Imperva Application Security Platform

Compared 8% of the time

Akamai vs Imperva Application Security Platform

Compared 4% of the time

Fortinet FortiWeb vs Imperva Application Security Platform

Compared 3% of the time

Link11 vs Imperva Application Security Platform

Compared 3% of the time

Fastly vs Imperva Application Security Platform

Compared 3% of the time

More Imperva Application Security Platform Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

CDN

October 2026

Download HPE Cloud CDN [EOL] product report

Buyer's Guide

Imperva Application Security Platform

October 2026

Imperva Application Security Platform report

Download Imperva Application Security Platform product report

Also Known As

HP Cloud CDN

Imperva Bot Management, Imperva Web Application Firewall, Imperva API Security

Overview

Information not available

Hewlett Packard Enterprise

Imperva Application Security Platform delivers comprehensive and continuous web threat protection. Renowned for its ease of use, it shields web applications and databases from various cyber threats while integrating seamlessly with cloud and on-premises environments.

Imperva Application Security Platform protects web environments by offering advanced security measures against threats like DDoS attacks, SQL injections, and cross-site scripting. As a robust web application firewall, it provides extensive monitoring and bot management capabilities. The platform integrates content delivery networks for enhanced performance and scalability, while real-time traffic analysis ensures consistent protection. Despite its strengths, improvements can be made in policy management and customization options. Users seek better integration with third-party tools and more competitive pricing models. The inclusion of AI for enhanced analytics is also anticipated.

What are the key features of Imperva Application Security Platform?

Correlated Attack Validation: Enhances threat assessment by linking related security events.
Threat Radar: Offers visibility into potential and ongoing threats.
Virtual Patching: Provides protection against vulnerabilities without immediate code changes.
IncapRules: Allows creation of custom security policies.
DDoS Protection: Defends against large-scale distributed denial-of-service attacks.
CDN Integration: Improves content delivery speed and reliability.

What benefits should users look for in reviews?

User-Friendly Administration: Simplifies setup and ongoing management tasks.
Seamless Integration: Ensures smooth operation with existing infrastructure.
Comprehensive Threat Protection: Shields digital assets from a wide range of threats.
Hands-On Support: Provides timely and effective customer service assistance.

Imperva Application Security Platform is implemented in industries needing strong database and application protection. Companies use it to enforce geolocation restrictions and manage bots, benefiting sectors like finance and e-commerce where data security and threat monitoring are critical. Its ability to protect and ensure data accessibility makes it integral to business operations prioritizing cyber resilience.

Imperva

Sample Customers

Comline, NNIT

Hitachi, BNZ, Bitstamp, Moz, InnoGames, BTCChina, Wix, LivePerson, Zillow and more.

Find out what your peers are saying about Cloudflare, Imperva, Amazon Web Services (AWS) and others in CDN. Updated: October 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

920,223 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our list of best CDN vendors.

We monitor all CDN reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.