We performed a comparison between Hitachi ShadowImage and Hitachi Thin Image Advanced based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Fivetran, NetApp, Equalum and others in Data Replication."The most valuable feature of Hitachi ShadowImage is high-speed data transfer from one server to another. Other solutions would have problems with transferring 50 TB of data. I also like that Hitachi ShadowImage is easy to use."
"Hitachi Thin Image is stable."
"API and script configuration in Hitachi ShadowImage is sometimes complicated, so this is an area for improvement. Another area for improvement is that the Hitachi ShadowImage interface isn't as user-friendly."
"We are having problems with the speed of synchronization and transferring of data."
Hitachi ShadowImage is ranked 9th in Data Replication with 1 review while Hitachi Thin Image Advanced is ranked 10th in Data Replication with 1 review. Hitachi ShadowImage is rated 8.0, while Hitachi Thin Image Advanced is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of Hitachi ShadowImage writes "Easy to use and can do high-speed data transfers from one server to another". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Hitachi Thin Image Advanced writes "Direct contact with technical support was good, stability is evident, with defined scalability". Hitachi ShadowImage is most compared with Hitachi TrueCopy, whereas Hitachi Thin Image Advanced is most compared with NetApp Snapshot.
See our list of best Data Replication vendors.
We monitor all Data Replication reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
