NetApp SnapMirror and Hitachi ShadowImage are competing in the data replication category. Hitachi ShadowImage often leads due to its comprehensive features and scalability, despite SnapMirror's competitive pricing and customer support.
Features: SnapMirror provides asynchronous and synchronous replication over long distances and efficient block-level data transfer for optimized bandwidth usage. ShadowImage offers zero-copy clones, fast recovery, and high scalability. The key difference is ShadowImage’s advanced recovery and scalability, suited for enterprise environments.
Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: SnapMirror is known for its straightforward deployment and reliable customer service, with extensive documentation and support channels. ShadowImage has a more complex setup but benefits from robust support, offering dedicated assistance. SnapMirror's easy deployment is an advantage, although ShadowImage's comprehensive support helps with its more challenging installation.
Pricing and ROI: SnapMirror is cost-effective with strong ROI due to efficient data use and lower initial costs. ShadowImage, while having a higher setup cost, offers long-term value through superior data management. The difference in ROI highlights ShadowImage's advanced features, justifying its premium price for organizations with advanced needs.
Nondisruptive, high-speed data replication within any Hitachi storage system or virtualized storage pool is a reality with Hitachi ShadowImage replication software. Use data immediately in modern data protection and copy data management operations.
We monitor all Data Replication reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
