Hitachi Thin Image Advanced vs NetApp SnapMirror comparison

Hitachi Vantara and NetApp are both solutions in the Data Replication category. Hitachi Vantara is ranked #6 with an average rating of 8.0, while NetApp is ranked #1 with an average rating of 9.1. Hitachi Vantara holds a 7.4% mindshare in DR, compared to NetApp’s 15.0% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of Hitachi Vantara users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of NetApp users who would recommend it.

Hitachi Thin Image Advanced

Read 2 Hitachi Thin Image Advanced reviews

516 Views
516 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

NetApp SnapMirror

Read 26 NetApp SnapMirror reviews

1,911 Views
1,873 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Hitachi Thin Image Advanced

NetApp SnapMirror

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Jan 1, 2025

NetApp SnapMirror and Hitachi Thin Image Advanced are competitive storage replication solutions. NetApp SnapMirror holds the upper hand in performance and capacity efficiency, while Hitachi Thin Image Advanced attracts with enterprise-specific features despite pricing.

Features: NetApp SnapMirror provides high scalability, broad protocol support, and integrated data protection. Hitachi Thin Image Advanced focuses on snapshot management, consistency across environments, and robust enterprise features.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: NetApp SnapMirror offers seamless integration and straightforward setup, supported by efficient customer service. Hitachi Thin Image Advanced may be more complex to deploy but includes specialized support tailored for enterprise needs.

Pricing and ROI: NetApp SnapMirror is associated with manageable setup costs and strong ROI due to scalability and flexibility. Hitachi Thin Image Advanced may require a higher initial investment but offers substantial returns through its feature-rich offerings.

To learn more, read our detailed Hitachi Thin Image Advanced vs. NetApp SnapMirror Report (Updated: July 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Hitachi Thin Image Advanced vs. NetApp SnapMirror

July 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 865,384 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Hitachi Thin Image Advanced

Ranking in Data Replication

6th

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

8.7

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

NetApp SnapMirror

Ranking in Data Replication

1st

Average Rating

8.8

Reviews Sentiment

7.1

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of August 2025, in the Data Replication category, the mindshare of Hitachi Thin Image Advanced is 7.4%, up from 6.8% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of NetApp SnapMirror is 15.0%, down from 21.2% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Data Replication

Featured Reviews

Bratislav Petkovic

Team Lead for Core Infrastructure at Raiffeisen bank Serbia

Fast data transfer and quick setup for new servers

We use Thin Image to image new test servers, create new development servers, and test new servers. It is also used for fast data transfer to new servers Hitachi Thin Image allows us to quickly create new data snapshots. It speeds up synchronization and setup tasks significantly, which is…

Read full review

Abdul-Salam

Sr. Manager - System Analyst (Datacenter Infrastructure) at Sohar International

Provides great data loss recovery and real time replication

Deployment was very smooth and took around two weeks. Following that, we carried out our data migration which took time. We previously used a Windows file independent server with its own local disk and Windows OS. It's not compatible with NetApp so data had to be physically migrated. We also took extra time integrating with our antivirus software and configuring external tape libraries with NetApp. We had one staff member involved in the deployment and an engineer from our partners. We have close to 900 users. The solution requires routine tasks as opposed to maintenance. We have three or four people with access to this storage.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The most beneficial feature is its fast data transfer capabilities."

"Hitachi Thin Image is stable."

"The synchronous and real-time replication are the most vital features of NetApp SnapMirror"

"The performance and stability are valuable features. It seems to fulfill all the requirements."

"Overall, the product is very good. It's an easy to use tool."

"There are a lot of features that are excellent. The data compression during the transfer, for example, is good. The replication is great. The durability of the solution and the speed of the data moving from one site to another is impressive."

"This solution is easy to implement and easy to use."

"The user interface is very easy to manage. The replication is also very easy to set up."

"NetApp is one of the best products in this field of storage solutions."

"They have a very effective dashboard and good reports."

More NetApp SnapMirror pros

Cons

"Hitachi needs to improve their management software, especially the Ops Center."

"We are having problems with the speed of synchronization and transferring of data."

"In the next release, I would like to see Data reduction included and WAN optimization."

"At the moment, we are not using the synchronous mirror, but we can implement the synchronous mirror. The only thing is that it needs another license. This is the same issue we have with business continuity. It needs another license to be implemented. You need too many separate licenses for the features. They should add some of the aspects of the premium bundle into the basic bundle. Sometimes our customers choose other replication services because of the initial cost of the licenses."

"The user interface could be simplified. They might want to have fewer options on it, to make it less complicated. There are a lot of options we never use ourselves. They're often very specialized and don't apply to us."

"Compression and deduplication could be improved."

"It is not as efficient as it needs to be. It doesn't compress the data really well when it is forwarded to a secondary site. The download performance could be better."

"The tool should also work on third-party solutions."

"If they can make the application free like other vendors or include it in all the packages, it would be great."

"Synchronous replication with read-write on both sides in both data centers is powerful but risky since it is greatly affected by high network latency."

More NetApp SnapMirror cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

Information not available

"It's a highly cost-effective solution"

"The pricing can be improved."

"The pricing could be improved."

"The cost is low compared to different vendors."

"The solution has monthly and yearly licensing options."

"The product price is reasonable."

"It's part of the NetApp Firewall, so it's free."

"SnapMirror is extremely expensive. We had a hard time adjusting to our budget. If rated on a scale of one to ten, with ten being the most expensive, I would definitely rate it ten out of ten."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Data Replication solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

865,384 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Computer Software Company

32%

Retailer

11%

Educational Organization

10%

Financial Services Firm

Manufacturing Company

19%

Computer Software Company

14%

Educational Organization

Financial Services Firm

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

Questions from the Community

What needs improvement with Hitachi Thin Image?

Hitachi needs to improve their management software, especially the Ops Center. Better management could enhance the overall experience.

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Hitachi Thin Image?

We use Thin Image to image new test servers, create new development servers, and test new servers. It is also used for fast data transfer to new servers.

See all answers

What advice do you have for others considering Hitachi Thin Image?

Thin Image is suitable for both small and big companies. It is highly recommended for its fast performance. I'd rate the solution eight out of ten.

See all answers

What do you like most about NetApp SnapMirror?

The performance and stability are valuable features. It seems to fulfill all the requirements.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for NetApp SnapMirror?

The product price is reasonable.

See all answers

What needs improvement with NetApp SnapMirror?

They could make continued enhancements in integration with diverse platforms for the product.

See all answers

Comparisons

NetApp Snapshot vs Hitachi Thin Image Advanced

Compared 65% of the time

Hitachi ShadowImage vs Hitachi Thin Image Advanced

Compared 35% of the time

More Hitachi Thin Image Advanced Competitors

NetApp Snapshot vs NetApp SnapMirror

Compared 73% of the time

Hitachi TrueCopy vs NetApp SnapMirror

Compared 9% of the time

Dell AppSync vs NetApp SnapMirror

Compared 7% of the time

Dell RecoverPoint vs NetApp SnapMirror

Compared 6% of the time

Hitachi Universal Replicator vs NetApp SnapMirror

Compared 5% of the time

More NetApp SnapMirror Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Data Replication

August 2025

Download Hitachi Thin Image Advanced product report

Buyer's Guide

NetApp SnapMirror

August 2025

Download NetApp SnapMirror product report

Also Known As

Hitachi Thin Image

SnapMirror

Overview

Nondisruptively copy data within any Hitachi storage system or virtualized storage pool. Hitachi Thin Image snapshot software quickly creates copies for immediate use in decision support, software development and modern data protection operations.

Hitachi Vantara

NetApp SnapMirror technology provides fast, efficient data replication and disaster recovery (DR) for your critical data. Use a single solution across all NetApp storage arrays and protocols. SnapMirror technology works with any application, in both virtual and traditional environments, and in multiple configurations, including hybrid cloud.

NetApp

Sample Customers

Net Credit Financial Group

University at Albany, City of Houston, Yahoo Japan, Washington Employment Security Department, DG Khan Cement Co. Ltd., AmTrust Financial Services, Sheridan College

Buyer's Guide

Hitachi Thin Image Advanced vs. NetApp SnapMirror

July 2025

Free Report: Hitachi Thin Image Advanced vs. NetApp SnapMirror

Find out what your peers are saying about Hitachi Thin Image Advanced vs. NetApp SnapMirror and other solutions. Updated: July 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

865,384 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Hitachi Thin Image Advanced vs. NetApp SnapMirror report.

See our list of best Data Replication vendors.

We monitor all Data Replication reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.