"Simple and extremely reliable."
"The most valuable feature is real-time analytics."
"The data protection algorithm to protect the data between the nodes has been the most valuable feature. The integration with backup platforms such as Veeam and Veritas has also been valuable."
"The ratio of total operational cost to complexity versus feature set is very good."
"The feature that I like most is the analytics part of the file system."
"The monitoring tool is not well developed."
"In the future, I would like to see non-disruptive updates."
"Qumulo should continue to expand automation and orchestration capabilities."
"The solution could improve availability and improve data protection or data services such as compression of deduplication. In a future release, we'd like to have more cloud API integrations."
"The price of the software is a bit expensive, so a reduction in cost would make it more competitive."
Earn 20 points
Hitachi NAS is ranked 10th in NAS with 1 review while Qumulo is ranked 9th in NAS with 4 reviews. Hitachi NAS is rated 8.0, while Qumulo is rated 7.0. The top reviewer of Hitachi NAS writes "As a consultant, the key benefits are the simplicity and reliability". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Qumulo writes "Easy to set up, good technical support, and it provides valuable usage analytics ". Hitachi NAS is most compared with NetApp FAS Series, Dell PowerScale (Isilon), Hitachi Virtual Storage Platform N Series, IBM FlashSystem and HPE StoreEasy, whereas Qumulo is most compared with Dell PowerScale (Isilon), NetApp FAS Series, Pure Storage FlashBlade, Scality RING8 and Dell ECS.
See our list of best NAS vendors.
We monitor all NAS reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
