Hitachi NAS Platform vs StarWind Storage Appliance comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Hitachi Vantara Logo
1,469 views|981 comparisons
100% willing to recommend
StarWind Logo
499 views|382 comparisons
100% willing to recommend
Comparison Buyer's Guide
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Hitachi NAS Platform and StarWind Storage Appliance based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out in this report how the two NAS solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI.
To learn more, read our detailed Hitachi NAS Platform vs. StarWind Storage Appliance Report (Updated: March 2024).
768,924 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pros
"The pricing of this solution is good, which is an advantage that positions this product well.""Simple and extremely reliable.""Hitachi is reliable with high availability and solid performance. It performs well regardless of the workload.""Hitachi NAS Platform is very stable.""The product’s technical support services are good.""The most valuable feature is its ability to handle a high number of users while maintaining both stability and performance.""The product has valuable features for data migration."

More Hitachi NAS Platform Pros →

"Its user-friendly interface makes it an attractive option, especially for customers who may not be highly tech-savvy.""The management interface is the most valuable feature for us.""They call us when monitoring shows a possible issue and are very flexible in working with our schedule to troubleshoot when it is convenient for us.""It is very easy to use and very cost effective.""The integration is excellent.""Having instant failover redundancy helps me sleep easier at night.""We are able to easily back up our data and send it to an offsite location.""Another good feature is that you can pause the appliance if you want to move it from one location to another and then once it's moved you can resume it, this way you can physically move the whole cluster or storage without any downtime. Its really easy to use, if you have a good foundation in storage and clustering then you will need less then one hour to figure out how to operate it."

More StarWind Storage Appliance Pros →

Cons
"Hitachi could be more flexible and have a simpler management interface.""I would like to see the inclusion of support for cloud-connectivity to providers like AWS.""I encounter challenges while installing the upgrades for the product.""I do not like Hitachi NAS because it's an old-school NAS solution, compared to the other, newer-type solutions such as Isilon from Dell or Qumulo.""The monitoring tool is not well developed.""Hitachi NAS Platform's pricing could be reduced. It is high compared to other competitors.""Hitachi NAS Platform is expensive."

More Hitachi NAS Platform Cons →

"It needs more integration with backup vendors so there is native integration with it that will allow storage level backup/snapshots. I would love to see integration with Veeam and Commvault so it can be recognized by them directly and added as network storage.""StarWind no longer sells HDDs for primary storage.""They offered onsite installation, but we chose to do it ourselves. That took longer and was more work for us but saved us a ton of money in the end.""An improvement would be if they reached out to education customers with other available products.""StarWind should improve the synchronization time of its product. There should be a standard operating procedure (SOP) for synchronization to reduce the time it takes.""The dashboard features are not in the free version.""With StarWind Storage Appliance, it would be better to have an overall easier setup with a little bit of configuration changes since, currently, even a small mistake may cause the setup process to go wrong.""Other solutions, such as StorMagic, offer more flexibility in terms of handling caching and moving data between additional nodes."

More StarWind Storage Appliance Cons →

Pricing and Cost Advice
  • "This solution is priced well and there are no costs in addition to the standard licensing fees."
  • "Costs are based on the features and it is a considerable amount."
  • "Hitachi NAS Platform’s price is high and depends on SCSI disc capacity."
  • "I would rate the solution's pricing six to seven out of ten."
  • "It is a highly-priced product."
  • More Hitachi NAS Platform Pricing and Cost Advice →

  • "It costs about 50,000 euros."
  • "StarWind by far provides the best bang for the buck."
  • "On the homepage, you can not see the pricing."
  • "The cost is determined by various factors, including the amount of terabyte storage you require, the number of nodes you want to purchase, and the duration of your maintenance agreement"
  • "With StarWind Storage Appliance, the payments made towards the licensing part of the product are on a per-node basis, making it cost-effective for us to use the solution in our company."
  • "We found that the price of StarWind was very good compared to VMware or Nutanix."
  • More StarWind Storage Appliance Pricing and Cost Advice →

    report
    Use our free recommendation engine to learn which NAS solutions are best for your needs.
    768,924 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Questions from the Community
    Top Answer:The product has valuable features for data migration.
    Top Answer:Hitachi NAS Platform's pricing could be reduced. It is high compared to other competitors.
    Top Answer:I would say data protection and easy management are the most valuable features of the product...I rate the technical support a nine out of ten.
    Top Answer:With StarWind Storage Appliance, the payments made towards the licensing part of the product are on a per-node basis, making it cost-effective for us to use the solution in our company. StarWind… more »
    Top Answer:From an improvement perspective, I can't comment much about StarWind Storage Appliance since we use only two to three nodes in our company, with which I am currently happy. If I use the product at an… more »
    Ranking
    15th
    out of 27 in NAS
    Views
    1,469
    Comparisons
    981
    Reviews
    0
    Average Words per Review
    0
    Rating
    N/A
    10th
    out of 27 in NAS
    Views
    499
    Comparisons
    382
    Reviews
    4
    Average Words per Review
    698
    Rating
    8.5
    Comparisons
    Also Known As
    Hitachi NAS
    Learn More
    Overview
    Hitachi NAS Platforms help you with file sharing, file server consolidation and application storage for Oracle, Microsoft and virtual environments. Deploy the highest performance per node in the industry. Apply capacity efficiencies that let you actually do more, but with a lot less. Realize significant cost savings for your organization.

    For SMB and Enterprises who are looking for high performance primary storage for server virtualization, VDI, database and Big Data scenarios, or inexpensive secondary backup tier, our solution is StarWind Storage Appliance. It unifies commodity servers, disks and flash, and associated software into an easily scalable storage platform.

    Additionally, the appliance features an optional gateway to Azure public cloud, which helps to implement an effective Disaster Recovery plan or meet regulatory requirements. StarWind SA scales up by adding individual disks and flash modules, or JBODs, while adding ready controller nodes allows scaling out. 

    StarWind SA targets those, who need high-performance primary storage or secondary storage for backup. In case there is a whole virtualization infrastructure to build from scratch, StarWind HCA will come in handy. Otherwise, if all the required hardware is present, StarWind Virtual SAN will be enough to build a high-performance virtualization setup. 

    Sample Customers
    Intersect Australia
    Bosch, EC2 IT, Solid Earth Inc., Canon
    Top Industries
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Computer Software Company14%
    Government12%
    Financial Services Firm11%
    Manufacturing Company9%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Computer Software Company24%
    Government13%
    Financial Services Firm11%
    University7%
    Company Size
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business50%
    Midsize Enterprise38%
    Large Enterprise13%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business22%
    Midsize Enterprise13%
    Large Enterprise65%
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business44%
    Midsize Enterprise33%
    Large Enterprise22%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business35%
    Midsize Enterprise14%
    Large Enterprise51%
    Buyer's Guide
    Hitachi NAS Platform vs. StarWind Storage Appliance
    March 2024
    Find out what your peers are saying about Hitachi NAS Platform vs. StarWind Storage Appliance and other solutions. Updated: March 2024.
    768,924 professionals have used our research since 2012.

    Hitachi NAS Platform is ranked 15th in NAS with 8 reviews while StarWind Storage Appliance is ranked 10th in NAS with 9 reviews. Hitachi NAS Platform is rated 6.8, while StarWind Storage Appliance is rated 9.2. The top reviewer of Hitachi NAS Platform writes "Good pricing and works well, but it is old-fashioned and should be replaced with something new". On the other hand, the top reviewer of StarWind Storage Appliance writes "Offers stable performance even with a single node failure and manages everything with just two nodes". Hitachi NAS Platform is most compared with NetApp FAS Series, Hitachi Virtual Storage Platform, Dell PowerScale (Isilon), IBM FlashSystem and Qumulo, whereas StarWind Storage Appliance is most compared with FreeNAS, StoneFly VSO NAS, StorMagic SvSAN and VMware vSAN. See our Hitachi NAS Platform vs. StarWind Storage Appliance report.

    See our list of best NAS vendors.

    We monitor all NAS reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.