No more typing reviews! Try our Samantha, our new voice AI agent.

Halliburton Aries Petroleum Economic Software vs JD Edwards EnterpriseOne comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive Summary

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

Halliburton Aries Petroleum...
Ranking in Production Planning
4th
Average Rating
8.0
Reviews Sentiment
5.7
Number of Reviews
2
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
JD Edwards EnterpriseOne
Ranking in Production Planning
1st
Average Rating
8.2
Reviews Sentiment
6.5
Number of Reviews
63
Ranking in other categories
ERP (7th), Activity Based Costing Software (3rd), Demand Management (1st)
 

Mindshare comparison

As of June 2026, in the Production Planning category, the mindshare of Halliburton Aries Petroleum Economic Software is 13.7%, up from 8.8% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of JD Edwards EnterpriseOne is 13.2%, up from 10.0% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Production Planning Mindshare Distribution
ProductMindshare (%)
JD Edwards EnterpriseOne13.2%
Halliburton Aries Petroleum Economic Software13.7%
Other73.1%
Production Planning
 

Featured Reviews

Jacobo Ortiz Avila - PeerSpot reviewer
Production Engineer at Parex Resources Inc
Has supported data integration across teams but lacks advanced analytics features
I'm not quite sure how they have helped us actually because I know about the platform, but I haven't used it as I did in the past as a production engineer. I am familiar with Halliburton Aries Petroleum Economic Software's decline curve analysis. It is not effective if you cannot do a historical match and adjust the parameters of the decline curve. If it is only a linear regression that you could get from the data, that would be a mistake. If you could adjust the parameters according to the engineering criteria, that would be interesting. But if it's an inferred value for the parameters, that gives you a scenario where you lose control, and you stop trusting the decline curve. Python is important because you could take out outliers from your data and describe properly the function that could describe your trend. It is necessary to have engineering capability to properly forecast. My experience with the pricing of this product limits us regarding the amount of licenses we could get, so it's challenging. The integration with other software helps us; we integrate with the platform through SQL, but it's the only connection we have experienced.
Euan Ellis - PeerSpot reviewer
Director of IT Applications at a manufacturing company with 1,001-5,000 employees
Has supported global operations through multi-currency and modular customization
Oracle's support is not that good for JD Edwards EnterpriseOne. Their support is expensive, and I don't think you're getting your bang for your buck. For the cloud product, they do give you support, but everything is online and you might not get somebody. I would give Oracle's support for JD Edwards EnterpriseOne about a 6.5 on a scale of one to 10.

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"For running economics, planning budgets, and reporting reserves, Aries is one of the best in the industry and used more than any other product in the industry for that purpose."
"The best features of Halliburton Aries Petroleum Economic Software are that they attempt to integrate everything coming from the field; every data point that we could get from the field creates a database not only from production but also the mechanical status the wells have."
"Financial reports are clearer and better aligned with business expectations."
"The navigation interface is user-friendly and easy to understand for any user. Many new employees who have joined our organization from different companies, having worked with SAP and Oracle E-Business Suite, have given positive feedback about JD Edwards EnterpriseOne. They particularly appreciate the types of reports, MIS capabilities, and how quickly and easily they can extract data. According to senior management from other organizations, these features are faster, easier, and more convenient than SAP."
"It’s a stable product."
"Easy to set up, user friendly, and continuous functional and technology enhancements."
"It can be scalable to any extent, with no issues and no boundaries, and it can serve small, medium, and large enterprises at the same time."
"It’s a good and configurable product."
"The solution can scale."
"The support information that you can find on the Oracle sites, the support sites, is huge and if I have a problem, then in 80% of the cases, I can find a solution somewhere on the support side of Oracle before I have to lock a service request with the Oracle support unit."
 

Cons

"It is not effective if you cannot do a historical match and adjust the parameters of the decline curve."
"For decline curve analysis, it could be more user friendly but once you understand how to customize it and tweak projections, it’s easy enough to use."
"I think their Transportation Management module, that's one of the bolt-ons that we have, is very limited."
"I would like to see improvements in the analytical part of JD Edwards EnterpriseOne, specifically in the business intelligence aspect, to enhance its capabilities compared to bespoke solutions."
"The only issue I see is Oracle's lack of focus on the product. When the sales team calls us, they try to promote OCI more than JD Edwards EnterpriseOne. They don't even talk about it. I feel there's no focus from Oracle Corporation themselves. The salespeople either don't know about it or don't talk about it. When they have something new, they only talk about EBS or OCI. This gives a feeling that there's no interest from Oracle. We don't see much new functionality being released or announced in the roadmap."
"We did have some stability issues. We currently use IBM WebSphere 7.1 and it sometimes does not look like it is 100% compatible."
"Localization features are critical for all regions. Improving these features in various countries and markets is essential to meet customer needs."
"It's got a steep learning curve."
"The pricing of this solution costs an arm and a leg."
"The initial setup of JD Edwards EnterpriseOne is straightforward. However, it could improve."
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

Information not available
"In terms of price, it is not on the high end."
"The price of JD Edwards EnterpriseOne is high. However, every ERP solution has a high price."
"More transparent pricing of the software is needed."
"The pricing is very high. Even though the license is perpetual yet you have to get the maintenance. Since we pay using Pesos, it's very expensive."
"The cost depends on the number of users and the modules required."
"The price of the solution is not cheap. However, it is priced average amongst competitors."
"It's very competitively priced. The only problem now is that most of the industry is moving towards software as a service or a subscription model, whereas JD Edwards has a capital expenditure. You would spend on the licenses once off. You can either host it on-premise or in the cloud, but there is a licensing fee once a year."
"The licensing is for mid-market businesses, where it is cheaper than Oracle Cloud, EBS, or SAP."
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Production Planning solutions are best for your needs.
902,417 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Energy/Utilities Company
34%
Government
8%
University
8%
Legal Firm
6%
Manufacturing Company
14%
Financial Services Firm
10%
Construction Company
10%
Comms Service Provider
6%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
No data available
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business22
Midsize Enterprise12
Large Enterprise32
 

Questions from the Community

What needs improvement with Halliburton Aries Petroleum Economic Software?
I'm not quite sure how they have helped us actually because I know about the platform, but I haven't used it as I did in the past as a production engineer. I am familiar with Halliburton Aries Petr...
What is your primary use case for Halliburton Aries Petroleum Economic Software?
This software is for production planning. It gathers production data from the field, which is my main use case.
What advice do you have for others considering Halliburton Aries Petroleum Economic Software?
We are working with Halliburton Aries Petroleum Economic Software, and I can provide a review regarding different reporting tools or monitoring tools. I would give them a rating of seven out of ten...
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for JD Edwards EnterpriseOne?
Initially, JD Edwards EnterpriseOne was priced very high, and the licensing is very expensive. I think Oracle has revised those prices. Competition has perhaps forced them to revise those pricing b...
What advice do you have for others considering JD Edwards EnterpriseOne?
I have experience with similar solutions and also this product, JD Edwards EnterpriseOne. I haven't worked with JD Edwards EnterpriseOne for the last 18 months, but I still know the product. I am f...
What needs improvement with JD Edwards EnterpriseOne?
JD Edwards EnterpriseOne's analytics are not that helpful. People generally attach other analytic solutions to it. This is something that JD Edwards EnterpriseOne could improve on.
 

Also Known As

Aries Petroleum Economic Software
No data available
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

StimWatch Stimulation Monitoring Service
TechNova Imaging Systems (P) Ltd, Jordan Petroleum Refinery, Hosun Universal Co. Ltd., Grupo Corporativo Papelera SA de CV, Label Technology Inc., Uniwax S.A., Al Jaber Group, SOMAR Corporation, SICIM S.p.A.,
Find out what your peers are saying about Halliburton Aries Petroleum Economic Software vs. JD Edwards EnterpriseOne and other solutions. Updated: June 2026.
902,417 professionals have used our research since 2012.