No more typing reviews! Try our Samantha, our new voice AI agent.

Google Meet Workspace vs TeamViewer comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive SummaryUpdated on Mar 19, 2026

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

Google Meet Workspace
Ranking in Virtual Meetings
12th
Average Rating
9.0
Reviews Sentiment
3.0
Number of Reviews
3
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
TeamViewer
Ranking in Virtual Meetings
2nd
Average Rating
8.6
Reviews Sentiment
6.8
Number of Reviews
110
Ranking in other categories
Remote Access (1st), Remote Monitoring and Management (RMM) (3rd)
 

Featured Reviews

Natalia Munera - PeerSpot reviewer
CEO at Autonomic Mind
Supports clear communication and uninterrupted collaboration even with limited network connectivity
Google Meet Workspace is the best app for meetings in the corporate scope because Microsoft Teams has many problems or issues with the app. The signal quality is a valuable feature. If you have low signal in your network or internet connection, Google Meet supports video calls better than Teams. Teams completely locks up with low network connection, and you need a good signal to use Teams. However, if you have low signal, Google Meet works better. The overall experience with Google Meet is better because you can use the app in an easy way. You find the buttons quickly without having to go through a lot of stages or processes. In Teams, you have to search a lot to make something because the experience is more difficult and complex. In Google Meet, if you want to share your screen, you just click one button and that is it. Screen sharing in Google Meet is easy to use, and the sharing screen is in high definition. Google Meet does not require a good signal connection. Google Meet works in low and medium connection, which is better for remote work. The intelligent noise cancellation feature is the best one. Sometimes you are working with other partners in the same place and you need to start a meeting with a client while in the same location with your other partners. You can turn on the noise cancellation and it works perfectly. Google Meet Workspace is a good solution. Google Workspace is very easy to integrate with other applications. For us, it is very easy to have Zoho One and make the meetings in Google Meet Workspace. The experience in general is good.
Shubham-Agarwal - PeerSpot reviewer
Manager - Projects at Cognizant
Remote access has cut critical issue resolution time and supports faster production troubleshooting
Perhaps on the UI side of TeamViewer because we are connecting to different remote desktop connections or remote server connections. Whenever we are working on one of the production issues and we open multiple connections, it is very hectic or confusing to jump from one server to another server. Perhaps on the UI side, if they can improve something related to the view sessions or which session is connected to which remote server, that would be helpful. Perhaps something related to the authentication because it should have a proper authentication mechanism. Every developer should not access TeamViewer or the remote desktop by using TeamViewer. We always have a proper authentication or multifactor authentication mechanism in place, so only those on on-call support or P1 support at that time can access the remote server, but not anyone else. I chose nine out of 10 because sometimes we face the session timeout issue. Suppose during the production support, we connect to one of the remote servers, and if it is idle for approximately 10 or 15 minutes, the session timeout happens. We have to follow the same authentication mechanism to connect to the remote server again. During the session timeout, it delays our process or the troubleshooting steps, which is the reason I have given nine out of 10 instead of 10.

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"What I appreciate about Google Meet Workspace is the simplicity, first of all; it has pretty much all the features that I could use on either Zoom or Skype, and it is very simple."
"Google Meet Workspace is the best app for meetings in the corporate scope because Microsoft Teams has many problems or issues with the app."
"The tools have made collaboration much easier because everyone can work on the same document in real time instead of exchanging multiple versions."
"There have been a couple of times with the handy remote access feature, where I have been asked for something at eight o'clock on a Thursday evening and it is on my desk machine, but I am driving back to my office. With TeamViewer, I can just stay at my home machine, connect to my work machine, and get the data needed without having to drive back across town."
"The performance and stability are good, there are no bugs or glitches, and it doesn't crash or freeze."
"It's feature-rich and easy to use."
"I recommend it as a solution for remote disk users."
"I can control any customer's PC right from my computer with ease."
"From my perspective, the most important is the login, and in my opinion, the user interface is good."
"It's very easy to set up."
"Saving users in the interface has helped our workflow and made things easier for our team because we use it every single day, and we would struggle to support our teams effectively without TeamViewer Business; it has made things much easier."
 

Cons

"What could be improved, I do not know the actual improvement yet, but when somebody sends me an email, I can just give you what I have on Outlook, Microsoft Outlook, and I can take that email and transform it into a meeting."
"There is no way to turn off that feature. Last week I was in my yoga class and I could not stop that function."
"One of the biggest frustrations I have experienced with Google Meet Workspace is occasional connectivity or audio issues during Google Meet Workspace sessions, especially when internet quality is poor."
"It would be very helpful if they could provide a manual for the installation process and describe more of their features."
"I don’t see any areas where improvement is needed."
"There are some issues with the stability of TeamViewer."
"They really need an AMT client and/or iLO client for business use."
"I believe latency can be optimized, and security control sometimes goes over the top and feels excessive."
"Having the ability to create subgroups and delegate permissions to the group members would be a helpful addition."
"I think the pricing could have been improved, as smaller organizations like us usually need a low-cost tool."
"Voice communication and screen communication or face-to-face communication could be improved."
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

Information not available
"We're using the free version. We do not pay any licensing fees."
"We are using the standard free version of TeamViewer."
"The price was cheaper than what we were previously paying. At the time that we went with TeamViewer, we were using ShareConnect. The TeamViewer package was about half the cost and able to have a bigger number of users."
"The cost of the licenses depends on how you buy them. They just had a buy one get one free deal going, and they do that every once in a while. Where you buy one license, and they will give you the second one free, or you can try to get discounts. Most of our licenses that we have we tried to do something like that just to save some money."
"The solution's pricing is reasonable."
"The pricing is a little bit on the higher side."
"TeamViewer offers a free version to try. Download and give it a shot. See what it's like and if you like it, then buy the license for it."
"We use the free version of TeamViewer."
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Virtual Meetings solutions are best for your needs.
909,725 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
No data available
Manufacturing Company
11%
Construction Company
10%
Computer Software Company
8%
Outsourcing Company
8%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
No data available
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business44
Midsize Enterprise37
Large Enterprise39
 

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Google Meet Workspace?
The price for Google Meet Workspace is perfect. I am the general manager in my company and Google Workspace is a very good cost.
What needs improvement with Google Meet Workspace?
One of the biggest frustrations I have experienced with Google Meet Workspace is occasional connectivity or audio issues during Google Meet Workspace sessions, especially when internet quality is p...
What is your primary use case for Google Meet Workspace?
My main use case for Google Meet Workspace is studying and collaborating on academic work. For example, I use Google Meet Workspace to attend online classes and group discussions, and the tools lik...
Should I choose Teamviewer Tensor over the regular Teamviewer?
The number one advantage of TeamViewer for me is its ease of use, specifically as it relates to the client side. By far, one of its best features is the remote access it provides. I can control som...
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for TeamViewer?
The pricing, setup cost, and licensing for TeamViewer Business are relatively very competitive and cost-effective.
What needs improvement with TeamViewer?
I believe latency can be optimized, and security control sometimes goes over the top and feels excessive. Virus scanning while file sharing is not provided, which is a concern as we frequently depl...
 

Comparisons

 

Also Known As

No data available
TeamViewer Tensor
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Information Not Available
Porsche Informatik, Philips, DHL, Intel, Motorola, Microsoft, IBM, Siemens, Fujitsu, American Red Cross
Find out what your peers are saying about Google Meet Workspace vs. TeamViewer and other solutions. Updated: August 2026.
909,725 professionals have used our research since 2012.