Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

Google Cloud Text-to-Speech vs Voicemaker comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive Summary

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

Google Cloud Text-to-Speech
Ranking in Text-To-Speech Services
3rd
Average Rating
8.4
Reviews Sentiment
5.2
Number of Reviews
3
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
Voicemaker
Ranking in Text-To-Speech Services
7th
Average Rating
0.0
Number of Reviews
0
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
 

Mindshare comparison

As of February 2026, in the Text-To-Speech Services category, the mindshare of Google Cloud Text-to-Speech is 20.3%, down from 29.9% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Voicemaker is 1.9%, up from 0.5% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Text-To-Speech Services Market Share Distribution
ProductMarket Share (%)
Google Cloud Text-to-Speech20.3%
Voicemaker1.9%
Other77.8%
Text-To-Speech Services
 

Featured Reviews

reviewer2252211 - PeerSpot reviewer
Principal Architect & NLP Python Developer at a computer software company with 1-10 employees
Support issues overshadow solid features in daily operations
The support is inadequate. We are dealing with them on our development talk today. There's a lot of finger-pointing going on in terms of whose problem it is. Moving our stuff up to the Google Cloud and getting it to work just as well as it does on people's development machines is problematic. Their support for that, even though we paid for it, isn't really very helpful. That's prevalent in the computer business. You need to have your own experts, otherwise you're really in trouble. The product is an eight out of 10. The support is at best a five. We have to write certain features ourselves because their offerings aren't very powerful. When I don't have a problem, it works pretty well, better than anybody else. But when I do have a problem, I'm severely impacted. It takes a lot of time and money to go back and fix it. What has gotten better with Google Cloud Text-to-Speech is their stuff sounds so natural, it really brings a smile to my face. I wish their support would be better.
Use Voicemaker?
Leave a review
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Text-To-Speech Services solutions are best for your needs.
881,384 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Financial Services Firm
12%
Educational Organization
10%
Computer Software Company
9%
Comms Service Provider
8%
No data available
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
No data available
No data available
 

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Google Cloud Text-to-Speech?
Our experience is we didn't have any other choice. We can't really say that it's well-priced or badly priced. We just didn't have another choice as far as we were concerned.
What needs improvement with Google Cloud Text-to-Speech?
The support is inadequate. We are dealing with them on our development talk today. There's a lot of finger-pointing going on in terms of whose problem it is. Moving our stuff up to the Google Cloud...
What is your primary use case for Google Cloud Text-to-Speech?
We use Speech-to-Text and Text-to-Speech to be able to talk to our users. We have an AI meaning engine that back-ends that. Once we get the speech, we can tell what it means. That's our use case. W...
Ask a question
Earn 20 points
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Home Depot, Paypal, Target, HSBC, McKesson
Information Not Available
Find out what your peers are saying about Amazon Web Services (AWS), Deepgram, Google and others in Text-To-Speech Services. Updated: January 2026.
881,384 professionals have used our research since 2012.