Globalscape EFT vs Thru comparison

Read 1 Thru review

1,310 Views
1,284 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Globalscape EFT

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Mar 22, 2026

Thru and Globalscape EFT are secure file transfer solutions for businesses, where Globalscape EFT stands out due to its advanced features.

Features: Thru provides seamless cloud integration, robust security measures, and user-friendly interfaces, appealing largely to enterprises needing accessible solutions. Globalscape EFT offers strong data encryption, automated workflows, and extensive security capabilities, catering to organizations with high data protection needs.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Thru has a cloud-based deployment model with excellent customer support, facilitating quick setup and continuous assistance. Globalscape EFT offers both on-premises and cloud options, which might require more technical expertise but is complemented by detailed documentation and training resources.

Pricing and ROI: Thru is a cost-effective option, favored by smaller enterprises due to lower upfront costs and quicker ROI. Globalscape EFT requires a higher initial investment, yet offers long-term savings and efficiency through its comprehensive features.

To learn more, read our detailed Managed File Transfer (MFT) Report (Updated: October 2026).

Managed File Transfer (MFT)

Download the complete report

Helped 920,769 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Globalscape EFT

Ranking in Managed File Transfer (MFT)

9th

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

6.9

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Thru

Ranking in Managed File Transfer (MFT)

17th

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

7.3

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of November 2026, in the Managed File Transfer (MFT) category, the mindshare of Globalscape EFT is 3.8%, down from 4.2% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Thru is 2.1%, up from 0.8% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Managed File Transfer (MFT) Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
Globalscape EFT	3.8%
Thru	2.1%
Other	94.1%

Managed File Transfer (MFT)

Featured Reviews

Ravi Kumar Dake

Software Developer at a computer software company with 1,001-5,000 employees

Seamless integration and enhanced automation streamline complex tasks while opportunities exist for improved batch file processing

The best feature of Globalscape EFT is that it has inbuilt encryption. We can use outside PGP encryption or we can use the inbuilt encryption as well, enabling us to do the encryption file transfer to the destinations. The other thing is that, by using the advanced workflow, we can make complex integrations for ease, and the workflow allows us to have alerts and everything by using email notifications through SMTP. We utilize the advanced automation capabilities, and we can also integrate to Azure. In one of the projects, we use Globalscape EFT as an intermediate integration and we use SAP BI where they send the files to Globalscape EFT. We take the files and push them to the banking system, where we get the response and return that back to the SAP system. Globalscape EFT can integrate with the Azure cloud systems as well. We can upload as many files as we can, and we can automate everything using SFTP software such as FileZilla, WinSCP, or any of the SFTP tools.

Read full review

reviewer1090674

Business Analyst at a media company with 1-10 employees

Scalable, reliable, and excellent support

I have been using Thru for approximately two years The stability of Thru is very good. Thru is a scalable solution. We have approximately 50 people using this solution. The technical support from Thru is great. I rate the support of Thru a five out of five. Positive The initial setup of Thru…

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The other solutions were cheaper, but they didn't give us the peace of mind to go to bed and know that we were going to have a good night of sleep, which we get with Globalscape EFT."

"Looking at the product and being trained on it, I find Globalscape to be a great file transmission application."

"A job skeleton can be used from test to production so you don't have to build jobs from scratch in production."

"Previously, we had multiple tools for file transfer; with GlobalSCAPE, we can meet all the business requirements, and its multiple options like folder monitoring and scheduled jobs make it a real-time file transfer solution."

"It made things easier. Before, there were five to 10 different software solutions spread out over 10 different servers. Now, everything is being centralized into one location; facilitating, supporting, maintaining, training people, etc. There have been gains just because Globalscape EFT is more efficient at moving things around than our previous other applications. For instance, if I am connecting to someone over the Internet or transmitting for the client, the speed of transmitting those files through SFTP is 20% to 30% faster than our previous automated solution. Therefore, we have seen time savings."

"We definitely pay one-tenth of the cost as compared to our previous solution, and it is covering all the bases."

"By going with Globalscape, we have been able to decommission Sterling B2B Integrator, Connect Enterprise, MOVEit, and soon, ExaVault, and that has streamlined and standardized our processes, drastically, and has helped with cost savings."

"The fact that it is Windows-based was a huge factor for us because most of our endpoints are Windows-based. And the ability to configure it means standardization is available with the product."

More Globalscape EFT pros

"The technical support from Thru is great."

"The stability of Thru is very good."

Cons

"There are two ways to install Globalscape: as a standalone server or as a high-availability server, either Active-Active or Active-Standby. We are currently using standalone servers. That means if we want to upgrade the software, I shut down one of the two back-end servers, upgrade the software, make sure everything is correct, and then turn traffic back on to that one. I then proceed to upgrade the second server. With their high-availability solution, that is not a possibility. Both servers have to be shut down to perform the upgrade. We're a 24/7 shop. We don't have a window where we can have downtime."

"It could improve its operations by incorporating real-time collaboration features like those offered by platforms such as Microsoft OneDrive and Office 365."

"With their high-availability solution, that is not a possibility. Both servers have to be shut down to perform the upgrade."

"If Globalscape has a higher number of tasks, performance issues will occur."

"The folder monitoring services need improvement. Currently, with the folder monitoring services in Globalscape, if any changes are made to our firewalls, network, or something else that affects the directory services where the files are located, for some reason, the folder monitoring services get cut out, and the files are left there. They remain in the folder without being sent. I have over 50 file transmission processes that I would have to go to manually re-drop a file into the folder so that it processes the file transmission. There are times where even though I re-drop a file, it still doesn't work. In that case, I have to resynchronize the folder monitoring process, and it is a very big headache on my side that I have to deal with. It is not only related to Globalscape or their development team. It is on our side too. I just sent a support case where we found out yesterday that we had a file transmission that hasn't run in a whole year, and it was an important one. No one on the business side or the IT support side, as well as the vendor, had indicated that the file wasn't received or the data hadn't been updated. I found out that it was the folder monitoring service that was the problem when I initially had the problem last October, and this was the file that I just missed. So, I re-dropped the file in yesterday, and the monitor worked. It runs every week, so we sent a file to that folder, and it processed that out."

"Globalscape EFT is prone to errors because one single click can lead to a file being sent to another vendor, and it doesn't give any warning if the code goes out of certain loops."

"Currently, with the folder monitoring services in Globalscape, if any changes are made to our firewalls, network, or something else that affects the directory services where the files are located, for some reason, the folder monitoring services get cut out, and the files are left there."

"GlobalSCAPE needs to provide training or seminars to show its capability to customers."

More Globalscape EFT cons

"We purchased the basic solution, only to realize that there is an add-on model that would allow us to manage workflows automatically. However, it was very expensive, so we did not use it."

"The initial setup of Thru needed an engineer to be involved."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The solution is reasonably priced in comparison to other products."

"It offers excellent value and its pricing is straightforward, making it easy to acquire, set up, and use."

"It is much more competitively priced. Axway is probably three or four times more expensive than Globalscape. I like the server-based license. It's easier to manage than a seat license, which our previous product Axway had. Axway's license model is to charge by the account while Globalscape's model is by the server. It is much simpler and much easier when audit time comes."

"It is a very good product in terms of purchase. It didn't cost that much, even with the way we had scaled and architecturally put things in place. It is definitely comparable to other products."

"Globalscape is not cheap, but you get what you pay for. The cost is worth the value of the product. What you're getting is a good, stable solution that does a lot."

"We are paying around 30K per year."

"Maintenance and services for Globalscape EFT have an annual price tag, and it is not cheap."

"A large factor in our decision to go with Globalscape was the price."

More Globalscape EFT pricing and cost advice

"Overall, the price of the solution is good for what it does, but when you want to add some features it can get expensive."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Managed File Transfer (MFT) solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

920,769 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Outsourcing Company

14%

Healthcare Company

11%

Financial Services Firm

10%

Construction Company

No data available

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	2
Large Enterprise	14

No data available

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Globalscape Managed File Transfer?

I never looked at the pricing for Globalscape EFT because it was at the management level where my line manager handled it. I was a team lead, so we only did the RFQs and everything. I never had a c...

See all answers

What needs improvement with Globalscape Managed File Transfer?

Globalscape EFT is prone to errors because one single click can lead to a file being sent to another vendor, and it doesn't give any warning if the code goes out of certain loops. The user interfac...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Globalscape Managed File Transfer?

Currently, I'm working on Globalscape EFT 2020. The usual use cases for Globalscape EFT that we are applying involve imports and data that we send from our organization to different vendors, and so...

See all answers

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Comparisons

Control-M vs Globalscape EFT

Compared 12% of the time

Progress MOVEit vs Globalscape EFT

Compared 12% of the time

MetaDefender Managed File Transfer (MFT) vs Globalscape EFT

Compared 9% of the time

GoAnywhere MFT vs Globalscape EFT

Compared 7% of the time

IBM Sterling File Gateway vs Globalscape EFT

Compared 7% of the time

More Globalscape EFT Competitors

GoAnywhere MFT vs Thru

Compared 19% of the time

Files.com vs Thru

Compared 18% of the time

MetaDefender Managed File Transfer (MFT) vs Thru

Compared 15% of the time

Axway AMPLIFY Managed File Transfer vs Thru

Compared 13% of the time

Control-M vs Thru

Compared 3% of the time

More Thru Competitors

Product Reports

Globalscape EFT

Download Globalscape EFT product report

Managed File Transfer (MFT)

Download Thru product report

Also Known As

Globalscape GlobalSCAPE Managed File Transfer

No data available

Interactive Demo

Demo not available

Fortra

Overview

Globalscape EFT enhances productivity through secure and location-independent data sharing. It features robust automation, integration with Windows and Linux, and a centralized interface for ease of use, making it ideal for seamless file transfer management and compliance.

Globalscape EFT specializes in secure file transfers between internal and external systems, supporting multiple encryption methods. It utilizes strong workflow automation and auditing tools, making it suitable for complex regulatory documentation. It integrates seamlessly with platforms like Salesforce for enhanced data management and is deployable both on-premises and cloud environments. Though it excels in many areas, improvements are needed in real-time collaboration and transfer speed for large files.

What are the key features of Globalscape EFT?

Location-Agnostic Data Sharing: Provides productivity tools for secure transfers regardless of user location.
Data Loss Prevention and PGP Encryption: Ensures secure data transmissions with enhanced protection.
Centralized Interface: Facilitates ease of use for file management and administration.
Powerful Automation: Streamlines complex workflows efficiently.
Advanced Workflow Engine: Supports challenging regulatory tasks.
Integration Options: Compatible with Windows, Linux, and systems like Salesforce.
Comprehensive Auditing Tools: Offers detailed insights into data management activities.

What benefits or ROI should users expect?

Enhanced Productivity: Facilitates efficient and secure file sharing.
Improved Compliance: Ensures adherence to regulatory requirements.
Streamlined Data Management: Automates processes for ease of operation.
Seamless System Integration: Connects with existing enterprise systems effortlessly.

Globalscape EFT is widely used in industries requiring secure data exchanges, such as finance and healthcare. Organizations utilize its event rules to automate workflows, connect with global financial networks, and meet compliance demands effectively. Its deployment flexibility supports both on-premises and cloud applications, catering to diverse operational environments.

Fortra

Thru offers a comprehensive file transfer solution tailored for enterprises, enabling secure and efficient data exchange across platforms while ensuring compliance with various data management requirements.

Thru serves businesses by facilitating seamless, secure integration between multiple systems, streamlining data transfer processes, and supporting collaboration. With tools that enhance data security and management, it caters to diverse industry-specific needs, ensuring robust performance and reliability.

What are the valuable features of Thru?

Secure File Transfer: Provides encrypted pathways for safe data transit between entities.
Multi-Platform Integration: Ensures compatibility and operational unity among different systems.
Audit and Reporting: Offers comprehensive logs and reports for data transfer monitoring.
Compliance Support: Aligns with industry standards for data protection and governance.

What benefits or ROI should users look for in reviews?

Increased Efficiency: Reduces the time and resources needed for data exchanges.
Enhanced Security: Minimizes the risk of data breaches with strong security protocols.
Operational Reliability: Ensures consistent performance with minimal downtime.
Scalability: Adapts to changing business needs without major upgrades.

Implementations of Thru in industries such as healthcare, finance, and logistics reflect its adaptability to high-stakes environments requiring compliance and data integrity. In healthcare, Thru enhances patient data exchange security. Logistics benefit from streamlined shipment data management, while finance uses its encryption features to safeguard sensitive transactions.

Sample Customers

Information Not Available

Dell EMC, Plus 500, Manhattan Associates, NetworkRail, Blackbaud, AB InBev, Blackwoods, Sage, Crocs

Managed File Transfer (MFT)