GitHub Code Scanning vs Rapid7 AppSpider comparison

GitHub and Rapid7 are both solutions in the Static Application Security Testing (SAST) category. GitHub is ranked #17 with an average rating of 8.6, while Rapid7 is ranked #32. GitHub holds a 1.2% mindshare in SAST, compared to Rapid7’s 0.5% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of GitHub users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of Rapid7 users who would recommend it.

GitHub Code Scanning

Read 5 GitHub Code Scanning reviews

815 Views
408 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Rapid7 AppSpider

Read 14 Rapid7 AppSpider reviews

865 Views
137 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

GitHub Code Scanning

Rapid7 AppSpider

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Oct 8, 2024

Rapid7 AppSpider and GitHub Code Scanning are competitors in application security. While both solutions offer unique advantages, GitHub Code Scanning holds the upper hand with its integration within the GitHub ecosystem and real-time capabilities that streamline developer workflows.

Features: Rapid7 AppSpider provides comprehensive vulnerability detection, broad technology support, and deep scanning capabilities across diverse environments. GitHub Code Scanning offers direct integration with GitHub, real-time scan capabilities, and continuous analysis throughout the development lifecycle.

Room for Improvement: Rapid7 AppSpider users suggest improvements in its reporting interface, documentation clarity, and ease of deployment. GitHub Code Scanning users point to the need for enhanced customization options, expanded language support, and improved vulnerability details.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Rapid7 AppSpider is often noted for its complexity and steep learning curve, whereas GitHub Code Scanning benefits from the familiar GitHub platform, offering smoother deployment. GitHub generally receives more favorable feedback for its responsive support aligned with developer needs.

Pricing and ROI: Rapid7 AppSpider faces criticism for higher setup costs, affecting ROI. GitHub Code Scanning is more favorably priced for teams already using GitHub, enhancing ROI through existing workflow integration. GitHub's cost-effectiveness provides a significant investment advantage for many users.

To learn more, read our detailed GitHub Code Scanning vs. Rapid7 AppSpider Report (Updated: June 2025).

Buyer's Guide

GitHub Code Scanning vs. Rapid7 AppSpider

June 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 858,649 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

GitHub Code Scanning

Ranking in Static Application Security Testing (SAST)

17th

Average Rating

8.6

Reviews Sentiment

8.2

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Rapid7 AppSpider

Ranking in Static Application Security Testing (SAST)

32nd

Average Rating

7.8

Reviews Sentiment

6.7

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of June 2025, in the Static Application Security Testing (SAST) category, the mindshare of GitHub Code Scanning is 1.2%, up from 0.2% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Rapid7 AppSpider is 0.5%, down from 0.5% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Static Application Security Testing (SAST)

Featured Reviews

VishalSingh

Consulting & Solutions, BA/BD in Enterprise IT on Open Source, Red Hat & EDB at KEEN AND ABLE COMPUTERS PVT LTD

Traverses the entire network, scanning every system to determine which ports are open

You can use the tool locally on your system or in the cloud. I rate it a nine out of ten. It's a very good tool for people who want to start using GitHubCode Scanning, especially for software development or team collaboration. GitHubCode Scanning allows teams to collaborate by uploading files to repositories. For example, if someone is developing an application, they can host the code on GitHub Code Scanning. Other developers can then download the code for testing purposes. If bugs are found, fixes can be applied using the GitHub Code Scanningrepository, and everyone on the team can see the changes. Software developers often use GitHub Code Scanning for version control, and it's essential for CI/CD pipelines to work.

Read full review

Rizwan-Alam

Head Information Security at Akhtar Fuiou Technologies

Easy automated web app scanning, but gives many false positives and isn't always stable

One of the challenges I have with AppSpider is that it gives you a lot of false positives, especially when compared to other solutions. This is the main aspect that I hope to see Rapid7 improve on. Beyond reducing false positives, I would also like to see them implement better reporting features, particularly in the executive summary type of reports which need to be user-friendly and easily understood by non-technical people. The recommendations and solutions on these reports could always be improved to make them more relevant, too. Lastly, the stability isn't that great, and sometimes it becomes non-responsive. I feel like the stability of the application is very average and currently needs more work.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"It's very scalable, very easy to handle, and very intuitive."

"We use GitHub Code Scanning mostly for source code management."

"The solution helps identify vulnerabilities by understanding how ports communicate with applications running on a system. Ports are like house numbers; to visit someone's house, you must know their number. Similarly, ports are used to communicate with applications. For example, if you want to use an HTTP web server, you must use port 80. It is the port on which the web application or your server listens for incoming requests."

"GitHub Code Spaces brings significant value with its simplicity and ease of use."

"The static code analysis capability in GitHub Code Scanning is a very powerful feature, providing the ability to identify vulnerabilities and ensure code quality."

"It is really accurate and the rate of false positives is very low."

"It scans all the components developed within a web application."

"What I like most about AppSpider is that it's easy to use and its automated scan gives me all the details I need to know when it comes to vulnerabilities and their solutions."

"One of the most valuable features of AppSpider is its broad range of authentication identification, which is a key reason for its utilization."

"I would say that it is stable, as I am not aware of any major issues."

"I like the ability the product has to detect vulnerabilities quickly, when it has been released in our environment, then displaying them to us."

"AppSpider's most valuable feature is reporting - everything is stored in the local database so it can be sent to other machines."

"The initial deployment is very straightforward and simple. The product is stable if configured properly."

More Rapid7 AppSpider pros

Cons

"One area for improvement could be the ability to have an AI system digest the reports generated from code scanning and provide a summary. Currently, the reports can be extensive, and users may overlook details, such as outdated libraries, which could be highlighted for attention."

"When running code scans, GitHub Code Scanning provides recommendations for probable fixes. However, integrating a feature where developers receive real-time highlights of vulnerabilities when checking in or merging a PR would be beneficial."

"GitHub Code Scanning should add more templates."

"At times it becomes very annoying as it highlights certain things which are intuitive. They require code coverage for those aspects as an extra overhead."

"The dashboard and interface are crucial and they need some improvement."

"The enterprise interface is too simple. It should be more customizable."

"Implementing Rapid7 AppSpider requires scanning and self-identification mechanisms. You can add different types of authentication to each scan."

"The solution is too slow. It could take a full day to scan. Competitors are much faster."

"The tech support is responsive but issues remain unresolved."

"There are some glitches with stability, and it is an area for improvement."

"One of the challenges I have with AppSpider is that it gives you a lot of false positives, especially when compared to other solutions."

"It needs better integration with mobile applications."

More Rapid7 AppSpider cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The minimum pricing for the tool is five dollars a month."

"GitHub Code Scanning is a moderately priced solution."

"It is expensive if you want to buy the Enterprise version that is able to scan multiple applications at once."

"The licensing cost depends on the number of users."

"The price of Rapid7 AppSpider cost 9,000 annually but there is limited usage. Large companies are able to negotiate a better price or a better deal for the usage with the vendor."

"AppSpider is closed-source software and you need to acquire a license in order to use it."

"The price is pretty fair."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Static Application Security Testing (SAST) solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

858,649 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Computer Software Company

13%

Manufacturing Company

11%

Financial Services Firm

10%

Government

Financial Services Firm

17%

Computer Software Company

12%

Manufacturing Company

Government

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about GitHub Code Scanning?

We use GitHub Code Scanning mostly for source code management.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for GitHub Code Scanning?

The organization pays for the license of GitHub Code Scanning, but specific price details are unknown.

See all answers

What needs improvement with GitHub Code Scanning?

When running code scans, GitHub Code Scanning provides recommendations for probable fixes. However, integrating a feature where developers receive real-time highlights of vulnerabilities when check...

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Rapid7 AppSpider?

The price is not high, but for Japanese customers, localization may incur additional costs.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Rapid7 AppSpider?

For Japanese customers, localization is needed. The product should offer a GUI in Japanese and provide Japanese reports for end-users.

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Rapid7 AppSpider?

Our clients use AppSpider to address security concerns for their websites. It is particularly used by customers who require security assessments.

See all answers

Comparisons

SonarQube Server (formerly SonarQube) vs GitHub Code Scanning

Compared 35% of the time

Coverity vs GitHub Code Scanning

Compared 28% of the time

SonarQube Cloud (formerly SonarCloud) vs GitHub Code Scanning

Compared 13% of the time

Aikido Security vs GitHub Code Scanning

Compared 9% of the time

Polaris Software Integrity Platform vs GitHub Code Scanning

Compared 5% of the time

More GitHub Code Scanning Competitors

Rapid7 InsightAppSec vs Rapid7 AppSpider

Compared 43% of the time

Acunetix vs Rapid7 AppSpider

Compared 10% of the time

Invicti vs Rapid7 AppSpider

Compared 7% of the time

OWASP Zap vs Rapid7 AppSpider

Compared 7% of the time

PortSwigger Burp Suite Professional vs Rapid7 AppSpider

Compared 7% of the time

More Rapid7 AppSpider Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Static Application Security Testing (SAST)

June 2025

Download GitHub Code Scanning product report

Buyer's Guide

Rapid7 AppSpider

June 2025

Download Rapid7 AppSpider product report

Also Known As

No data available

AppSpider

Overview

Code scanning is a feature that you use to analyze the code in a GitHub repository to find security vulnerabilities and coding errors. Any problems identified by the analysis are shown in GitHub.

GitHub

SPAs, APIs, mobile—the evolution of application technology is measured in months, not years. Is your web application security testing tool designed to keep up? AppSpider lets you collect all the information needed to test all the apps so that you aren’t left with gaping application risks.

Our dynamic application security testing (DAST) solution crawls to the deepest, darkest corners of even the most modern and complex apps to effectively test for risk and get you the insight you need to remediate faster. With AppSpider on your side (or, rather, all of your sides), you’ll be able to scan all the apps today and always be ready for whatever comes next.

Rapid7

Sample Customers

Information Not Available

Microsoft

Buyer's Guide

GitHub Code Scanning vs. Rapid7 AppSpider

June 2025

Free Report: GitHub Code Scanning vs. Rapid7 AppSpider

Find out what your peers are saying about GitHub Code Scanning vs. Rapid7 AppSpider and other solutions. Updated: June 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

858,649 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our GitHub Code Scanning vs. Rapid7 AppSpider report.

See our list of best Static Application Security Testing (SAST) vendors.

We monitor all Static Application Security Testing (SAST) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.