Gigamon Deep Observability Pipeline vs Lumu comparison

Gigamon and Lumu Technologies are both solutions in the Network Detection and Response (NDR) category. Gigamon is ranked #16 with an average rating of 8.3, while Lumu Technologies is ranked #6 with an average rating of 9.0. Gigamon holds a 1.8% mindshare in NDaR, compared to Lumu Technologies’s 3.2% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of Gigamon users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of Lumu Technologies users who would recommend it.

Gigamon Deep Observability ...

Read 9 Gigamon Deep Observability Pipeline reviews

4,146 Views
373 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Lumu

Read 8 Lumu reviews

1,747 Views
1,031 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Gigamon Deep Observability ...

Lumu

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Nov 6, 2024

Gigamon Deep Observability Pipeline and Lumu compete in network visibility and security. Gigamon has an edge in comprehensive data handling, appealing to enterprises seeking robust data insights, while Lumu is notable for its focus on quick and effective threat detection.

Features: Gigamon offers packet filtering, encryption features, and data aggregation for network analysis. Lumu provides network anomaly illumination, simple threat identification, and an activity graph for cybersecurity behavior analysis.

Room for Improvement: Gigamon could enhance its intelligence in traffic flow analysis, streamline its integration process, and improve visibility features. Lumu may improve real-time threat detection, expand its automated response capabilities, and enhance the detail in reporting alerts.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Lumu is known for a seamless integration process and responsive support, facilitating rapid deployment. Gigamon, although comprehensive and robust, often requires a more complex setup needing technical expertise, but it offers detailed support throughout implementation.

Pricing and ROI: Gigamon's advanced features reflect a higher initial investment, providing substantial ROI through improved network visibility. Lumu offers cost-effective solutions focusing on threat detection efficiency and provides attractive ROI for businesses seeking economic solutions.

To learn more, read our detailed Gigamon Deep Observability Pipeline vs. Lumu Report (Updated: December 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Gigamon Deep Observability Pipeline vs. Lumu

December 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 879,425 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Gigamon Deep Observability ...

Ranking in Network Detection and Response (NDR)

16th

Average Rating

8.6

Reviews Sentiment

6.5

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability (39th), Event Monitoring (11th), Data Loss Prevention (DLP) (32nd), Security Information and Event Management (SIEM) (43rd), Web Application Firewall (WAF) (31st), Advanced Threat Protection (ATP) (26th), Network Packet Broker (NPB) (1st)

Lumu

Ranking in Network Detection and Response (NDR)

6th

Average Rating

9.2

Reviews Sentiment

7.7

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Intrusion Detection and Prevention Software (IDPS) (9th), Extended Detection and Response (XDR) (17th)

Mindshare comparison

As of January 2026, in the Network Detection and Response (NDR) category, the mindshare of Gigamon Deep Observability Pipeline is 1.8%, up from 1.0% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Lumu is 3.2%, up from 3.1% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Network Detection and Response (NDR) Market Share Distribution
Product	Market Share (%)
Lumu	3.2%
Gigamon Deep Observability Pipeline	1.8%
Other	95.0%

Network Detection and Response (NDR)

Featured Reviews

TuanNguyen13

Senior Relationship Banker at Joint stock Commercial Bank for Foreign Trade of V

Experience boosts operational efficiency while performance sees room for improvement

I don't have specific information on whether it was purchased on the AWS marketplace or somewhere else. I am working with Dynatrace Operator. I am also working with Algosec, Alluvio, CrowdStrike, Firemon, Gigamon Deep Observability Pipeline, and other solutions. I think it's a good tool, and I am satisfied with it. We have not stored cloud workloads with Gigamon Deep Observability Pipeline yet; we are still on-premises. The technical support takes about one to two hours to respond, which is acceptable. I am satisfied with the scalability of the product. The interface is good.

Read full review

Jeremiah Johnson

Director, Information Technology at a educational organization with 201-500 employees

Constant monitoring and analysis boosts network security

There is always room for improvement. I am not giving it a perfect score because I am sure there is something that could be enhanced.Having some sort of certification or training, along with more periodic webinars might be helpful. Having a larger support network would be beneficial. Nobody I know has heard of Lumu, so they are in the same space as Darktrace or CrowdStrike, but people give blank stares. As the community grows for Lumu then that will improve, but that is not really a criticism of Lumu, they simply have not been around that long.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The tool's most valuable feature is the encryption feature. From a security perspective, the solution hasn't significantly strengthened our security posture. However, it has greatly improved performance by streamlining encryption processes and avoiding encryption at multiple layers. This has also simplified troubleshooting, as we can whitelist certain processes."

"The solution is straightforward to set up."

"The most valuable feature for improving network visibility with Gigamon is the packet filtering capability."

"It is a good product. It provides network visibility, which is important. Gigamon can bring some optimizations to my network. It is helpful for security inspection, and it makes my firewall work fast because my firewall doesn't have to do the inspection of the SSL connections, for example."

"It offers straightforward integration."

"The Pipeline's Comprehensive Insights into data flows have helped improve operational efficiency and security."

"The most valuable feature is NetFlow."

"It has high stability."

"Lumu protects against threats immediately and handles them in time."

"The tool's support team helps partners resolve any problems with the product."

"It's been helpful for overall extended network visibility."

"I like Lumu's simple user interface. When we deployed it, we got full access, allowing us to identify IP addresses on the network and connect machine names to users. It helped us identify and block threats via the firewall. I also appreciate the chat support and ticket closure process. We're currently reviewing network detection solutions, and my recommendations include Lumu, Sentinel, and a few others. Regarding functionality and user-friendliness, I would recommend Lumu over the others."

"You can access external links, playbooks, MITRE Matrix, and a lot of information."

"The context provided by the tool is very complete, it includes the miter matrix, playbooks, links, hashes, and much more."

"The automated response to incidents works effectively out of the box, and the number of interfaces and platforms it can work with is impressive."

"Most of it is automated, so I do not have to watch it to get alerts."

Cons

"Gigamon Deep Observability Pipeline needs to improve its performance. I face issues with performance because we use SPAN, and the SPAN traffic is not good."

"Its filtering feature needs improvement."

"In terms of improvement, while the initial setup is not overly complicated, we did encounter a few issues."

"The graphical user interface could be improved."

"The security should be improved."

"It only inspects a specific kind of traffic. There should be different kinds of use cases."

"The Gigamon Deep Observability Pipeline should have a feature showing the traffic flow within its platform. Currently, customers have to use separate tools for monitoring, which is inconvenient. If it had its visibility feature, it would make monitoring easier and more complete without needing extra tools."

"They should increase the solution's cluster capacity."

"The integration with different vendors and endpoints could be improved."

"It would be good if we could access the physical logs."

"I am happy with the current features. However, one important one is to improve the reports."

"Lumu's ability to discover threats is an area of concern where improvements are needed."

"Having a larger support network would be beneficial. Nobody I know has heard of Lumu, so they are in the same space as Darktrace or CrowdStrike, but people give blank stares."

"The reports need improvement."

"Nothing so far needs to be improved."

"The free version is minimal compared to the full version."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The solution's price is reasonable."

"I would rate the solution as expensive, around an eight or nine out of ten. There are other competitive solutions available."

"The solution is highly-priced."

"The tool is available at a good price. The tool offers a good and competitive price for customers."

"Compared to Lumu, other solutions are more expensive. SentinelOne was a bit cheaper, and another provider's price structure is unclear, but Lumu fit our budget nicely. SentinelOne's cost depends on the number of devices, and it might be similar to Lumu's, depending on deployment."

"It is the cheapest solution we found."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Network Detection and Response (NDR) solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

879,425 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

14%

Computer Software Company

11%

Healthcare Company

Manufacturing Company

Insurance Company

Financial Services Firm

Educational Organization

Government

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	3
Midsize Enterprise	1
Large Enterprise	5

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	5
Midsize Enterprise	1
Large Enterprise	4

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Gigamon Deep Observability Pipeline?

The most valuable feature for improving network visibility with Gigamon is the packet filtering capability.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Gigamon Deep Observability Pipeline?

Gigamon Deep Observability Pipeline needs to improve its performance. I face issues with performance because we use SPAN, and the SPAN traffic is not good. They need to improve their performance.

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Gigamon Deep Observability Pipeline?

I am working with Gigamon Deep Observability Pipeline and Firemon, and I have been working with it for a year.

See all answers

What do you like most about Lumu?

Lumu protects against threats immediately and handles them in time.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Lumu?

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Lumu?

We use it as our managed SOC instead of contracting with an MSP. It coordinates endpoint and gives us a single pane of glass for our security events.It fulfills the role of a SIEM, serving as our d...

See all answers

Comparisons

Ixia Network Packet Brokers vs Gigamon Deep Observability Pipeline

Compared 14% of the time

Cisco Nexus Dashboard Data Broker vs Gigamon Deep Observability Pipeline

Compared 10% of the time

NETSCOUT nGeniusONE vs Gigamon Deep Observability Pipeline

Compared 7% of the time

Arista Data ANalyZer vs Gigamon Deep Observability Pipeline

Compared 6% of the time

Big Switch Networks vs Gigamon Deep Observability Pipeline

Compared 5% of the time

More Gigamon Deep Observability Pipeline Competitors

Darktrace vs Lumu

Compared 36% of the time

Wazuh vs Lumu

Compared 15% of the time

Stellar Cyber Open XDR vs Lumu

Compared 12% of the time

Microsoft Defender XDR vs Lumu

Compared 8% of the time

Vectra AI vs Lumu

Compared 8% of the time

More Lumu Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Event Monitoring

December 2025

Gigamon Deep Observability Pipeline report

Download Gigamon Deep Observability Pipeline product report

Buyer's Guide

Lumu

December 2025

Download Lumu product report

Also Known As

Gigamon, GigaSecure

No data available

Overview

Gigamon Deep Observability Pipeline is a comprehensive network visibility solution that provides real-time insights into network traffic. It offers SSL inspection and mobile network monitoring for traffic monitoring purposes. The solution optimizes networks, aids in security inspection, and improves firewall performance. It is praised for its performance, power, straightforward integration, stability, and ease of initial setup.

With Gigamon, organizations can gain complete visibility into their network traffic, identify potential threats, and take proactive measures to prevent them. The solution is ideal for organizations of all sizes, including enterprises, service providers, and government agencies.

Gigamon

Lumu Technologies is a cyber-security company that illuminates threats, attacks, and adversaries affecting enterprises worldwide. Using actionable intelligence, Lumu provides a radical way to secure networks by enhancing and augmenting existing defense capabilities established over the past 25 years.

Lumu Technologies

Sample Customers

Amica Insurance, College of William & Mary, Gamma, IntercontinentalExchange, OppenheimerFunds

Information Not Available

Buyer's Guide

Gigamon Deep Observability Pipeline vs. Lumu

December 2025

Free Report: Gigamon Deep Observability Pipeline vs. Lumu

Find out what your peers are saying about Gigamon Deep Observability Pipeline vs. Lumu and other solutions. Updated: December 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

879,425 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Gigamon Deep Observability Pipeline vs. Lumu report.

See our list of best Network Detection and Response (NDR) vendors.

We monitor all Network Detection and Response (NDR) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.