Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

GeneXus vs QuickBase comparison

GeneXus and Quickbase are both solutions in the Low-Code Development Platforms category. GeneXus is ranked #20 with an average rating of 8.5, while Quickbase is ranked #12 with an average rating of 8.7. GeneXus holds a 0.9% mindshare in LCDP, compared to Quickbase’s 1.6% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of GeneXus users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 98% of Quickbase users who would recommend it.
GeneXus
Read 14 GeneXus reviews
  • 727 Views
  • 352 Comparison Views
100% willing to recommend
QuickBase
Read 75 QuickBase reviews
  • 1,891 Views
  • 870 Comparison Views
98% willing to recommend
 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report
Executive SummaryUpdated on Sep 18, 2024

QuickBase and GeneXus are two prominent solutions in the low-code development platform market. QuickBase seems to have the upper hand in ease of use and accessibility, while GeneXus outshines in comprehensive development capabilities.

Features: QuickBase users benefit from its user-friendly nature, extensive integration options, and flexible features. GeneXus users appreciate its all-in-one development environment, support for multiple languages, and strong capabilities for complex applications.

Room for Improvement: QuickBase could improve its advanced reporting features, offer more customizable templates, and enhance overall flexibility. GeneXus could make its development environment more intuitive, streamline the initial setup process, and improve general usability.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: QuickBase is praised for its straightforward deployment and responsive customer support, making it accessible for non-technical users. GeneXus offers powerful features but presents a steeper learning curve during deployment, with mixed reviews regarding customer support efficacy.

Pricing and ROI: QuickBase offers competitive pricing plans that are affordable and easy to justify. GeneXus, while appearing expensive initially, provides significant ROI through its extensive capabilities and automation potential.

DOWNLOAD THE COMPLETE REPORT
To learn more, read our detailed GeneXus vs. QuickBase Report (Updated: April 2025).
Buyer's Guide
GeneXus vs. QuickBase
April 2025
Download the complete report
Helped 850,028 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

ROI

Sentiment score
7.1
GeneXus offers high ROI for large companies, excels in banking apps, and is effective for both extensive and limited user systems.
Sentiment score
7.1
QuickBase delivers significant financial benefits by reducing costs, increasing productivity, improving efficiency, and enhancing business visibility.
 

Customer Service

Sentiment score
7.6
GeneXus customer service is fast, knowledgeable, cooperative, usually responding within 24 hours, and generally rated highly by users.
Sentiment score
7.8
QuickBase customer service excels in quick technical support with extensive resources, despite limited weekend support and occasional delays.
No quotes available
For more quotes and insights, download the GeneXus report
Technical support is really good, and I would rate it a nine out of ten.
For more quotes and insights, download the QuickBase report
 

Scalability Issues

Sentiment score
8.4
GeneXus is scalable and adaptable, supporting growth from small projects to large systems with high ratings for ease and efficiency.
Sentiment score
7.7
QuickBase is highly scalable, efficiently managing growth in users and data, with strong support for expanding applications.
No quotes available
For more quotes and insights, download the GeneXus report
Quick Base has high potential to scale.
For more quotes and insights, download the QuickBase report
 

Stability Issues

Sentiment score
8.1
GeneXus offers high stability with bi-monthly upgrades, rated 8-10 by users, best suited for simpler front-end applications.
Sentiment score
7.8
QuickBase is stable with minor disruptions, rated highly by users for reliability and timely maintenance communication.
 

Room For Improvement

GeneXus requires better front-end, training, security, integration, collaboration, market awareness, UI, code speed, cost, community, alerts, performance, and language support.
QuickBase requires better customization, UI, mobile experience, improved reporting, integrations, security, formulas, training, APIs, and cost management.
No quotes available
For more quotes and insights, download the GeneXus report
The introduction of hooks would allow for easier deployment elsewhere, such as GitHub.
For more quotes and insights, download the QuickBase report
 

Setup Cost

GeneXus offers costly multi-plan licenses but justifies the price by replacing multiple developers and including maintenance and upgrades.
Enterprise buyers appreciate QuickBase's flexible pricing, but costs rise with users; negotiating tailored solutions is advised for large enterprises.
No quotes available
For more quotes and insights, download the GeneXus report
Pricing could be cheaper.
For more quotes and insights, download the QuickBase report
 

Valuable Features

GeneXus offers rapid deployment, seamless tech integration, error detection, multi-language support, automation, and a user-friendly architecture.
QuickBase provides code-free app creation, customization, and efficient data management, enhancing operational efficiency with PaaS capabilities and API integrations.
No quotes available
For more quotes and insights, download the GeneXus report
This provides a unified solution without needing different databases or pipelines.
For more quotes and insights, download the QuickBase report
 

Categories and Ranking

GeneXus
Ranking in Low-Code Development Platforms
20th
Average Rating
8.6
Reviews Sentiment
7.8
Number of Reviews
14
Ranking in other categories
Mobile Development Platforms (10th)
QuickBase
Ranking in Low-Code Development Platforms
12th
Average Rating
9.0
Reviews Sentiment
7.4
Number of Reviews
75
Ranking in other categories
Rapid Application Development Software (16th), Employee Time Tracking Software (2nd)
 

Mindshare comparison

As of May 2025, in the Low-Code Development Platforms category, the mindshare of GeneXus is 0.9%, up from 0.6% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of QuickBase is 1.6%, down from 1.7% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Low-Code Development Platforms
 

Featured Reviews

XavierEspinoza - PeerSpot reviewer
Offers a simplified architecture with outstanding integration capabilities
The integration capabilities of GeneXus are highly valuable for our organization. The metadata obtained within the logic of different systems is also vital. Due to the solution, our company team doesn't have to work with multiple languages and integrations can be made with C Sharp. JavaScript can also be used with GeneXus, the tool takes charge of all the rest and has a simple architecture. The solution can be used out of the box without facing any issues and nothing much needs to be done with frameworks. In our case we need to use Python with GeneXus, we use Ironpython to embed python code in C# .
Read full review
Daniel Ream - PeerSpot reviewer
Reliable, user-driven platform, that is scalable
I would highly recommend working closely with QuickBase and taking advantage of their subcontractors who specialize in building QuickBase apps. QuickBase does a great job of connecting potential users with these subcontractors. However, I would also advise tempering expectations and being aware that building and customizing applications in QuickBase takes time. It is a user-driven platform, so it requires investment and effort to create meaningful solutions. I would rate QuickBase a ten out of ten. I believe that if implemented properly, QuickBase can provide immense value to any organization. It can be used for various purposes such as managing purchase orders, tracking change orders, and monitoring project metrics. By using QuickBase as a central hub, it becomes a reliable and trustworthy source for project-related information. This ability to consolidate and organize data makes it an invaluable tool. Moreover, any solution that helps transform information from individual knowledge into a structured database is undoubtedly a worthwhile investment.
Read full review
report
See which vendors are best for you
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Low-Code Development Platforms solutions are best for your needs.
See recommendations
850,028 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Computer Software Company
14%
Financial Services Firm
11%
Manufacturing Company
8%
Construction Company
7%
Educational Organization
76%
Computer Software Company
3%
Financial Services Firm
3%
Healthcare Company
2%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
 

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about GeneXus?
GeneXus evolves with technology.
See all answers
What needs improvement with GeneXus?
GeneXus needs to be more consistent in functionality without any errors. Code generation is highly time-consuming for GeneXus, but in some cases, it saves time as well. Some errors will take too lo...
See all answers
What is your primary use case for GeneXus?
Our company uses the latest version of GeneXus. The solution is used in our company to develop various enterprise systems, and GeneXus is used as an integrator, which further facilitates low-cost d...
See all answers
What do you like most about QuickBase?
The most valuable feature of QuickBase is its dynamic form capabilities. These forms allow backend automation, making tasks like updating data based on specific conditions much easier.
See all answers
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for QuickBase?
Pricing could be cheaper. I rate it around a seven out of ten. Mainly larger companies use it, which influences the pricing structure.
See all answers
What needs improvement with QuickBase?
The user interface of Quick Base is complex. It can be difficult to navigate, and ideally, it should be simplified to facilitate use by anyone, not just certified individuals. There is room for imp...
See all answers
 

Comparisons

Oracle Application Express (APEX) vs GeneXus Logo
Oracle Application Express (APEX) vs GeneXus
Compared 24% of the time
Microsoft Power Apps vs GeneXus Logo
Microsoft Power Apps vs GeneXus
Compared 21% of the time
Mendix vs GeneXus Logo
Mendix vs GeneXus
Compared 15% of the time
Microsoft Azure App Service vs GeneXus Logo
Microsoft Azure App Service vs GeneXus
Compared 15% of the time
Magic xpa Application Platform vs GeneXus Logo
Magic xpa Application Platform vs GeneXus
Compared 12% of the time
More GeneXus Competitors
Microsoft Power Apps vs QuickBase Logo
Microsoft Power Apps vs QuickBase
Compared 30% of the time
ServiceNow vs QuickBase Logo
ServiceNow vs QuickBase
Compared 22% of the time
OutSystems vs QuickBase Logo
OutSystems vs QuickBase
Compared 14% of the time
Mendix vs QuickBase Logo
Mendix vs QuickBase
Compared 10% of the time
Pega Platform vs QuickBase Logo
Pega Platform vs QuickBase
Compared 6% of the time
More QuickBase Competitors
 

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide
GeneXus
April 2025
GeneXus reportDownload GeneXus product report
Buyer's Guide
QuickBase
April 2025
QuickBase reportDownload QuickBase product report
 

Also Known As

No data available
Quick Base, TSheets
 

Overview

What is GeneXus? GeneXus™ is the best Low-Code Platform that you don't know yet.

It's a Software Development Platform that simplifies and automates the tasks of creating and evolving enterprise applications and multi-channel user-experiences. Great Advantages:

- Higher productivity, with automatic maintenance & evolution
- Multi-Experience, we continuously create new code generators
- Agile, incremental approach, with fully functional prototypes
- Easier to learn, one single language to cover all technologies
- Future-proof, we've been around for 30 years, evolving for you

Key Differentiators against the competition:

- No runtime fees, we charge by developer
- Best theoretical framework, which allows us to evolve
- Best coverage in the market: Most technologies, most languages, most markets and industries
- We run on-premise or on the cloud
- Multiple starting points depending on the type of company you work in, with products for Students, Startups, ISVs, Corporate Development, and SAP technologies

GeneXus uses Artificial Intelligence techniques to create software, enabling truly incremental development of apps, providing a low-code, future-proof development platform for the leading execution platforms and languages, and the most popular DBMS.

GeneXus

Trusted by more than half of the Fortune 100, QuickBase is a low-code platform for building, customizing, and integrating custom business applications. With more than 6,000 customers and 500,000 active users, QuickBase is the technology of choice for organizations that want to empower business users to solve their own challenges while maintaining the governance and security of an enterprise-quality app development system.

Quickbase
 

Sample Customers

Canal de Panamá, Gerdau, Coca-Cola, Mercado Libre, DHL, Mitsubishi Heavy Industries, TECNISA, Mexican Polak Group, Ferrovalle, Canon, Azteca, KPMG, TURBUS, Santander, BBVA
Procter & Gamble, Tesla, Norwegian Cruise Line, Google, Metso, Agero, Kayak, PTC, Patra Corp, TomTom, Southwest Airlines, FedEx Office
Buyer's Guide
GeneXus vs. QuickBase
April 2025
Free Report: GeneXus vs. QuickBase
Find out what your peers are saying about GeneXus vs. QuickBase and other solutions. Updated: April 2025.
DOWNLOAD NOW
850,028 professionals have used our research since 2012.
See our GeneXus vs. QuickBase report.
See our list of best Low-Code Development Platforms vendors.

We monitor all Low-Code Development Platforms reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.