Visual Studio Test Professional and Galen Framework compete in the software testing domain. Visual Studio Test Professional has an advantage with its support and integration, while Galen Framework offers valuable unique features.
Features: Visual Studio Test Professional integrates seamlessly with Azure DevOps, offers robust test management tools, and provides excellent reporting capabilities. Galen Framework specializes in responsive layout testing with visual validations and supports multiple programming languages.
Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Visual Studio Test Professional benefits from Microsoft's extensive support and documentation, facilitating easy deployment and management. Galen Framework, being open-source, allows flexible deployment but requires more technical expertise to navigate.
Pricing and ROI: Visual Studio Test Professional has a higher setup cost due to its licensing model, but offers higher ROI for organizations within Microsoft's ecosystem. Galen Framework, as open-source, presents a lower setup cost, attracting organizations looking for budget-friendly layout testing options.
| Product | Market Share (%) |
|---|---|
| Visual Studio Test Professional | 1.0% |
| Galen Framework | 0.3% |
| Other | 98.7% |
| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 15 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 14 |
| Large Enterprise | 23 |
Layout testing seemed always a complex task. Galen Framework offers a simple solution: test location of objects relatively to each other on page. Using a special syntax and comprehensive rules you can describe any layout you can imagine.
Galen Framework runs well in Selenium Grid. You can set up your tests to run in a cloud like Sauce Labs or BrowserStack so that you can even test your responsive websites on different mobile devices. Galen can run multiple tests in parallel which is also a nice time saver.
Galen Framework is designed with responsivness in mind. It is easy to set up a test for different browser sizes. Galen just opens a browser, resizes it to a defined size and then tests the page according to specifications.
We monitor all Functional Testing Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
