OpenText Functional Testing and Galen Framework compete in automated testing tools. OpenText has an advantage in pricing and support, while Galen offers superior features that justify its cost.
Features: OpenText Functional Testing offers comprehensive automation capabilities, robust testing scripts, and detailed reporting. Galen Framework provides specialized web layout testing, cross-browser compatibility, and a focus on design and layout validation.
Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Galen Framework benefits from compatibility with various platforms and straightforward integration into existing systems, supported by community-driven assistance. OpenText Functional Testing requires more extensive initial setup and relies on formal customer service channels for support.
Pricing and ROI: OpenText Functional Testing has competitive pricing with a significant initial setup cost, promising substantial ROI through detailed testing capabilities. Galen Framework offers a lower upfront cost with benefits through its efficient layout testing features.
Product | Market Share (%) |
---|---|
OpenText Functional Testing | 8.5% |
Galen Framework | 0.3% |
Other | 91.2% |
Company Size | Count |
---|---|
Small Business | 20 |
Midsize Enterprise | 12 |
Large Enterprise | 71 |
Layout testing seemed always a complex task. Galen Framework offers a simple solution: test location of objects relatively to each other on page. Using a special syntax and comprehensive rules you can describe any layout you can imagine.
Galen Framework runs well in Selenium Grid. You can set up your tests to run in a cloud like Sauce Labs or BrowserStack so that you can even test your responsive websites on different mobile devices. Galen can run multiple tests in parallel which is also a nice time saver.
Galen Framework is designed with responsivness in mind. It is easy to set up a test for different browser sizes. Galen just opens a browser, resizes it to a defined size and then tests the page according to specifications.
OpenText Functional Testing provides automated testing with compatibility across technologies, browsers, and platforms. It targets APIs, GUIs, and applications like SAP and Oracle for efficient test automation, emphasizing usability and integration with tools such as Jenkins and ALM.
OpenText Functional Testing offers wide-ranging automation capabilities for functional and regression testing, API testing, and automation across web, desktop, and mainframe applications. It supports script recording and object identification, appealing to less technical users. Despite its advantages, it grapples with memory issues, stability concerns, and a challenging scripting environment. Its VBScript reliance limits flexibility, generating demand for enhanced language support and speed improvement. Users appreciate its role in continuous integration and deployment processes, managing test data efficiently, and reducing manual testing efforts.
What are the key features of OpenText Functional Testing?In industries like finance and healthcare, OpenText Functional Testing is leveraged for end-to-end automation, ensuring streamlined processes and accuracy in testing. Many companies utilize it for efficient test data management and integrating testing within continuous integration/deployment operations.
We monitor all Functional Testing Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.